AULA vs Epomaker: Two Budget Keyboard Titans Compared
AULA dominates with Rapid Trigger value. Epomaker stands out with retro design and massive batteries. We put their best wireless keyboards side by side to see which brand delivers more.
All featured products are independently selected by me. However, when you buy something through my affiliate links, I may earn a small commission. This helps support my work and allows me to continue providing free content to you.
Featured in this article
In the AULA vs Epomaker debate, AULA wins on gaming value with Rapid Trigger across its lineup, while Epomaker offers more design variety with retro screens, QMK/VIA support on select models, and premium materials like copper and aluminum.
Both brands sell wireless gasket-mount keyboards at prices that would have seemed impossible a few years ago. AULA plays a focused game: the F75, F87, F98, and F99 follow a clear template with Rapid Trigger on higher-end models. Epomaker swings wider, from the retro RT100 with its built-in screen to the tiny TH40 with QMK/VIA and the copper-clad P75.
When choosing between AULA vs Epomaker, the question is whether you want a brand that perfected one approach or one that gives you more variety. Here are the keyboards that matter most.
AULA's Star Player: F75
AULA F75
The F75's popularity isn't a fluke. A 6.3 popularity score, 2,253+ reviews, and a 4.6-star average reflect a keyboard that consistently delivers on its promises. The feature list reads like it belongs on a $150 board: gasket mount, Rapid Trigger, tri-mode wireless, hot-swap sockets. Pick the plastic case to save money, or step up to aluminum if you want a more premium feel.
What gives the F75 an edge over Epomaker's offerings is Rapid Trigger. None of Epomaker's traditional mechanical keyboards offer it, which matters if you game competitively. In the AULA vs Epomaker matchup, the F75 is the default pick for gamers on a budget. The 4000mAh battery, PBT keycaps, rotary knob, and N-key rollover fill out a 75% layout that's hard to beat on pure value.
| Specs | |
|---|---|
| Name | AULA F75 |
| Release year | 2023 |
| Switch Options | Silent, Linear |
| Profile | Normal Profile |
| Hot Swappable | |
| Layout Size | 75% |
| Layout Standard | ANSI |
| Layout Ergonomics | Normal |
| Show all | |
AULA for the Long Haul: F99
AULA F99
AULA packed an 8000mAh battery into the F99, which is enough juice to forget wireless charging exists for a while. The 96% layout keeps your numpad and nav cluster without eating up full-size desk space, gasket mount and sound dampening handle comfort, and Rapid Trigger ensures the F99 doubles as a gaming keyboard when you're off the clock.
At 4.8 stars from 50 reviews, early adopters clearly like what they're getting. Compared to Epomaker's RT100, the F99 is less flashy but more functionally complete: Rapid Trigger, longer battery life, and a layout that's arguably more practical for office work. It's the AULA pick for anyone whose keyboard pulls double duty.
| Specs | |
|---|---|
| Name | AULA F99 |
| Release year | 2023 |
| Switch Options | Linear |
| Profile | Normal Profile |
| Hot Swappable | |
| Layout Size | 96% |
| Layout Standard | ANSI |
| Layout Ergonomics | Normal |
| Show all | |
AULA at Its Cheapest: F87
AULA F87
The F87 is how far AULA can stretch a dollar. Drop the RGB, swap to an ABS case, and you've got a TKL wireless keyboard with gasket mount, hot-swap, PBT keycaps, and a 4000mAh battery at a price that undercuts most of the competition. The typing feel is surprisingly close to the F75: the gasket mount does most of the heavy lifting.
It's a no-nonsense pick. The 80% layout works for gamers who need arrow and function keys, and N-key rollover handles fast inputs. If you're comparing this against Epomaker's lineup, the F87 costs less than anything Epomaker offers with similar wireless specs, which makes it a strong default if budget is your primary concern.
| Specs | |
|---|---|
| Name | AULA F87 |
| Release year | 2025 |
| Switch Options | Linear |
| Profile | Normal Profile |
| Hot Swappable | |
| Layout Size | 80% |
| Layout Standard | ANSI |
| Layout Ergonomics | Normal |
| Show all | |
Epomaker's Wildcard: TH40
Epomaker TH40
Forty keys. That's it. The TH40 drops the number row, the function row, and most punctuation, then relies entirely on QMK/VIA programmable layers to give you everything back through key combos. It's not for everyone, and the 3.9-star average from 46 reviews reflects the learning curve. But the 5.2 popularity score says plenty of people love it.
This is the only keyboard here with full QMK/VIA support, which means open-source firmware, community keymaps, and the kind of deep customization that neither AULA nor the rest of Epomaker's lineup offers. In the AULA vs Epomaker comparison, the TH40 is Epomaker's answer for enthusiasts who want programmable layers. Gasket mount, 3000mAh battery, and tri-mode wireless are present despite the tiny form factor.
| Specs | |
|---|---|
| Name | Epomaker TH40 |
| Release year | 2024 |
| Switch Options | Linear |
| Profile | Normal Profile |
| Hot Swappable | |
| Layout Size | 40% |
| Layout Standard | ANSI |
| Layout Ergonomics | Split Spacebar |
| Show all | |
AULA's Quiet Workhorse: F98
AULA F98
The F98 doesn't headline reviews or generate hype. It just quietly gives you a 98% layout with gasket mount, sound dampening, 4000mAh battery, and tri-mode wireless at a fair price. Hot-swap sockets and PBT/ABS keycaps handle the basics. No Rapid Trigger here, which bumps you to the F75 or F99 if that matters.
It occupies a sensible middle ground: more keys than a 75%, more compact than a full-size, and reliable enough to recommend without caveats. Compared to Epomaker's 96% layouts, the F98 is simpler and cheaper. If you want AULA's comfortable gasket-mount typing with nearly every key at your fingertips and aren't chasing gaming features, the F98 does exactly that.
| Specs | |
|---|---|
| Name | AULA F98 |
| Release year | 2025 |
| Switch Options | Linear |
| Profile | Normal Profile |
| Hot Swappable | |
| Layout Size | 98% |
| Layout Standard | ANSI |
| Layout Ergonomics | Normal |
| Show all | |
Epomaker's Endurance King: TH99 Pro
Epomaker TH99 Pro
Ten thousand milliamp hours. That's not a typo. The TH99 Pro packs a battery nearly twice the size of most wireless keyboards in this comparison. Combined with a 96% layout, a built-in screen, a rotary knob, and gasket mount construction, you've got Epomaker's most complete wireless productivity keyboard.
Early reviews sit at 4.8 out of 5, and the wireless endurance alone is enough to grab attention. For people who are tired of remembering to charge yet another device, the TH99 Pro essentially removes that concern. It competes directly with the AULA F99 on layout and features, but wins decisively on battery and loses on Rapid Trigger. Your priorities determine the winner in the AULA vs Epomaker matchup.
| Specs | |
|---|---|
| Name | Epomaker TH99 Pro |
| Release year | 2026 |
| Switch Options | Linear, Silent |
| Profile | Normal Profile |
| Hot Swappable | |
| Layout Size | 96% |
| Layout Standard | ANSI |
| Layout Ergonomics | Normal |
| Show all | |
AULA vs Epomaker: Which Brand Should You Choose?
AULA is best for gamers and value seekers who want Rapid Trigger, consistent build quality, and wireless performance at the lowest possible price. Epomaker is best for buyers who prioritize design variety, premium materials, programmable firmware, or extreme battery life.
Choose AULA if gaming and value are your top concerns. The F75 and F99 deliver Rapid Trigger and strong specs at prices Epomaker can't match. Choose Epomaker if you want retro aesthetics, QMK/VIA on the TH40, metal construction on the P75, or the 10000mAh battery on the TH99 Pro.
Both brands deliver excellent budget wireless keyboards. Your priorities determine the winner.
Compare Side by Side
| AULA F75 | AULA F99 | AULA F87 | Epomaker TH40 | AULA F98 | Epomaker TH99 Pro |
-32% off 88 Overall/ Value 88.4Build Quality 76.0Customizability 82.3Performance 77.2Productivity 91.8Portability 82.0 | 75 Overall/ Value 75.4Build Quality 63.2Customizability 73.1Performance 59.7Productivity 89.1Portability 64.4 | 62 Overall/ Value 62.3Build Quality 60.0Customizability 48.5Performance 57.6Productivity 75.7Portability 73.0 | -10% off 82 Overall/ Value 81.6Build Quality 75.4Customizability 86.1Performance 73.8Productivity 62.5Portability 84.2 | -23% off 67 Overall/ Value 66.9Build Quality 60.1Customizability 58.7Performance 74.0Productivity 75.8Portability 53.3 | 76 Overall/ Value 75.9Build Quality 68.9Customizability 73.3Performance 78.5Productivity 83.1Portability 62.7 |
4.6 stars (2796 reviews) | 4.8 stars (51 reviews) | 5.0 stars (1 reviews) | 3.9 stars (52 reviews) | 0.0 stars (0 reviews) | 4.9 stars (15 reviews) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scores
| Scores
| Scores
| Scores
| Scores
| Scores
|
Name AULA F75 | Name AULA F99 | Name AULA F87 | Name Epomaker TH40 | Name AULA F98 | Name Epomaker TH99 Pro |
Release year 2023 | Release year 2023 | Release year 2025 | Release year 2024 | Release year 2025 | Release year 2026 |
Switch Options Silent, Linear | Switch Options Linear | Switch Options Linear | Switch Options Linear | Switch Options Linear | Switch Options Linear, Silent |
Profile Normal Profile | Profile Normal Profile | Profile Normal Profile | Profile Normal Profile | Profile Normal Profile | Profile Normal Profile |
Hot Swappable | Hot Swappable | Hot Swappable | Hot Swappable | Hot Swappable | Hot Swappable |
Layout Size 75% | Layout Size 96% | Layout Size 80% | Layout Size 40% | Layout Size 98% | Layout Size 96% |
Layout Standard ANSI | Layout Standard ANSI | Layout Standard ANSI | Layout Standard ANSI | Layout Standard ANSI | Layout Standard ANSI |
Layout Ergonomics Normal | Layout Ergonomics Normal | Layout Ergonomics Normal | Layout Ergonomics Split Spacebar | Layout Ergonomics Normal | Layout Ergonomics Normal |
Knob Support | Knob Support | Knob Support | Knob Support | Knob Support | Knob Support |
Display Support | Display Support | Display Support | Display Support | Display Support | Display Support |
Mac/Win Support | Mac/Win Support | Mac/Win Support | Mac/Win Support | Mac/Win Support | Mac/Win Support |
Multi-Media Keys | Multi-Media Keys | Multi-Media Keys | Multi-Media Keys | Multi-Media Keys | Multi-Media Keys |
USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C |
USB passthrough | USB passthrough | USB passthrough | USB passthrough | USB passthrough | USB passthrough |
Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless, Wired only | Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless | Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless | Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless | Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless | Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless |
Polling Rate 1000 Hz | Polling Rate - | Polling Rate 1000 Hz | Polling Rate 1000 Hz | Polling Rate 1000 Hz | Polling Rate 1000 Hz |
Battery capacity 4000 mAh | Battery capacity 8000 mAh | Battery capacity 4000 mAh | Battery capacity 3000 mAh | Battery capacity 4000 mAh | Battery capacity 10000 mAh |
Hall Effect Support | Hall Effect Support | Hall Effect Support | Hall Effect Support | Hall Effect Support | Hall Effect Support |
QMK Support | QMK Support | QMK Support | QMK Support | QMK Support | QMK Support |
VIA Support | VIA Support | VIA Support | VIA Support | VIA Support | VIA Support |
VIAL Support | VIAL Support | VIAL Support | VIAL Support | VIAL Support | VIAL Support |
N-Key Rollover | N-Key Rollover | N-Key Rollover | N-Key Rollover | N-Key Rollover | N-Key Rollover |
Rapid Trigger | Rapid Trigger | Rapid Trigger | Rapid Trigger | Rapid Trigger | Rapid Trigger |
Mount Style Gasket Mount | Mount Style Gasket Mount | Mount Style Gasket Mount | Mount Style Gasket Mount | Mount Style Gasket Mount | Mount Style Gasket Mount |
Screw in Stabilizers | Screw in Stabilizers | Screw in Stabilizers | Screw in Stabilizers | Screw in Stabilizers | Screw in Stabilizers |
Sound Dampening | Sound Dampening | Sound Dampening | Sound Dampening | Sound Dampening | Sound Dampening |
Backlight Rgb, South-face, North-face | Backlight Rgb, North-face | Backlight | Backlight Rgb, South-face | Backlight Rgb | Backlight Rgb, South-face |
Case Colors | Case Colors | Case Colors | Case Colors | Case Colors | Case Colors |
Case Material Plastic, Aluminum, ABS | Case Material ABS, Plastic, PBT | Case Material ABS | Case Material ABS | Case Material Plastic | Case Material ABS |
Keycaps Material PBT, ABS | Keycaps Material PBT | Keycaps Material PBT | Keycaps Material PBT | Keycaps Material PBT, ABS | Keycaps Material PBT |
Dimensions 43 x 143 x 323 mm | Dimensions 43 x 147 x 391 mm | Dimensions 41 x 139 x 365 mm | Dimensions 35 x 258 x 97 mm | Dimensions 41 x 138 x 385 mm | Dimensions 47 x 410 x 145 mm |
Weight 1023g | Weight 1023g | Weight 1020g | Weight 500g | Weight 1040g | Weight 1120g |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Read more
Keychron vs Wooting: Do You Need Wireless Flexibility or Hall Effect Speed?
AULA vs Keychron: Can Budget Gasket Mounts Keep Up with Premium QMK Boards?
