Redragon K628 Pollux vs FIZZ K61775% vs 60%
Choose the K628 Pollux for its larger 75% layout and dedicated arrow keys, or the FIZZ K617 if a smaller 60% footprint matters more.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Which one should you get?
Get the
Redragon K628 Pollux
75%
Build quality in the bottom 25% of 75% boards under $50.
- 75% ANSI layout with separate arrow keys.
- 470g listed weight, lighter than the FIZZ K617.
- Hot-swappable switches and N-key rollover.
- No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
- No numpad.
Get the
Redragon FIZZ K617
60%
Build quality in the top 45% of 60% boards under $50.
- Compact 60% layout for a smaller desk footprint.
- Redragon specifies compatibility with 3-pin and 5-pin switches.
- Hot-swappable switches, RGB lighting, and N-key rollover.
- Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Pick the Redragon K628 Pollux if separate arrow keys and its larger 75% layout are more useful than saving desk space. Choose the FIZZ K617 if you want a 60% design and value its explicitly listed 3-pin and 5-pin switch compatibility. Both are wired, hot-swappable RGB options, so the layout is the clearest deciding factor.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Redragon K628 Pollux
Redragon FIZZ K617
Layout size
75%
60%
Switch options
Linear
Clicky, Linear
Display
None
LED
A case display rather than a typing feature
Weight
470 g
590 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
Layout standard
ANSI
ANSI, ISO, ISO-DE, ISO-ES, ISO-FR, ISO-IT, ISO-UK, JIS
ISO and JIS exist so regional layouts fit
- Redragon K628 Pollux
- Redragon FIZZ K617
- Performance
- 7870
- Build quality
- 5661
- Productivity
- 6153
- Customizability
- 5867
- Portability
- 6170
- Connection: Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Case material: Plastic
- Mount style: Bottom Mount
What will you mostly use it for?
The K628 Pollux is the more practical pick for work-oriented use where a larger layout and separate arrow keys matter. The FIZZ K617 has an advantage for buyers who prioritize a compact footprint and want the vendor-stated 3-pin and 5-pin switch compatibility. The K628 Pollux is lighter, despite the FIZZ K617's smaller layout. Both remain wired, hot-swappable RGB keyboards with linear switch options and N-key rollover.
Pick the Redragon K628 Pollux
- Both keyboards use linear switches and include N-key rollover.
- The K628 Pollux has separate arrow keys, while the FIZZ K617's 60% layout lacks dedicated arrow keys.
- The FIZZ K617 is the more compact option for buyers prioritizing desk space.
Redragon K628 Pollux vs FIZZ K617 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
6 of 17 specs differ
Redragon K628 Pollux
Redragon FIZZ K617
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
USB-C
Case material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
N-key rollover
Released
ISO layouts by store
Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.
Redragon K628 Pollux
No ISO layout at the stores we track.
Redragon FIZZ K617
Redragon
ISO-UK
In stockShips to you
Redragon
ISO-FR
In stockShips to you
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Redragon K628 Pollux vs FIZZ K617: your questions
The K628 Pollux is a 75% keyboard with separate arrow keys, while the FIZZ K617 uses a 60% layout. The FIZZ K617 takes a more compact approach, but its compatibility notes specify no dedicated arrow keys or function row.
Yes. Redragon describes the K628 Pollux as having separate arrow keys in its 78-key layout.
No. Its 60% layout is listed as having no dedicated arrow keys, function row, or numpad.
The FIZZ K617 is the smaller-layout choice at 60%, compared with the K628 Pollux at 75%. The FIZZ K617 product listing also gives dimensions of 38 x 99 x 36 mm.
The K628 Pollux is listed at 470g, while the FIZZ K617 is listed at 590g. The K628 Pollux is lighter despite having the larger layout.
Yes, both are listed as hot-swappable. Redragon specifically states that the FIZZ K617 supports 3-pin and 5-pin switches.
Both product listings include linear switches. The K628 Pollux vendor description identifies its included switches as Outemu Red switches, while the FIZZ K617 description calls its stock switches red linear switches.
Yes, both the K628 Pollux and FIZZ K617 are listed with RGB lighting. Redragon describes up to 20 preset backlighting modes for each model.
No, both are listed as wired-only keyboards. Each product description identifies a USB-C or Type-C cable connection.
The K628 Pollux may suit programming better if you want a larger 75% layout and separate arrow keys. The FIZZ K617 is more compact, but its 60% layout has no dedicated arrow keys or function row.
The FIZZ K617 metadata lists ANSI and ISO options, including ISO-DE, ISO-ES, ISO-FR, and ISO-IT. The K628 Pollux is listed as ANSI, with no ISO variants offered.
Both keyboards are hot-swappable and have RGB lighting. Redragon describes software customization for both, and specifically lists 3-pin and 5-pin switch compatibility for the FIZZ K617.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.