Which one should you get?
Get the
Akko 5075B Plus
Screen
- Supports multiple ISO physical layouts (DE, UK, Nordic, NO).
- Includes VIA support for open-source key remapping and macro editing.
- Comes with extensive sound-dampening materials: IXPE switch pad, silicone plate foam, and case foams.
- Significantly heavier at 1500g.
- Lacks a built-in screen for system information or customization.
- Vendor description lists a 3000mAh battery, conflicting with the 4500mAh spec.
Get the
AULA F75 Max
Layout Choice
- Features a customizable TFT screen for GIFs, lighting control, and system stats.
- Lighter weight of 960g and slightly more compact dimensions.
- Includes a metal volume knob and media controls.
- Only supports the ANSI physical layout.
- Smaller 4000mAh battery capacity.
- No mention of VIA or similar open-source firmware support in the provided information.
Your primary need dictates the choice. Select the Akko 5075B Plus if you require specific ISO layouts, value deep firmware customization with VIA, or want extensive pre-installed sound dampening. Opt for the AULA F75 Max if a customizable TFT screen, lighter portability, and convenient media controls are higher priorities.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Akko 5075B Plus
AULA F75 Max
Battery
3,000 mAh
4,000 mAh
Case material
ABS, Plastic, Silicone
ABS
Switch options
Clicky, Linear
Linear
Display
None
TFT
Weight
1,500 g
960 g
- Akko 5075B Plus
- AULA F75 Max
- Performance
- 7979
- Build quality
- 7376
- Productivity
- 9291
- Customizability
- 7578
- Portability
- 8180
- Layout size: 75%
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Knob
What will you mostly use it for?
The Akko 5075B Plus wins for office and programming use due to its international layout support and VIA software. The AULA F75 Max is better for travel and content creation, thanks to its lighter weight, TFT screen, and media controls. For gaming and general modding, the keyboards are closely matched, with the Akko having a slight edge in firmware customization.
It's a tie
- Both offer a 1000Hz polling rate for responsive input.
- Both feature N-key rollover for simultaneous key presses.
- Both have south-facing RGB lighting.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Akko 5075B Plus
No owner reviews collected yet.
AULA F75 Max
52 owner reviews
“Great sound, great control wheel, and overall amazing quality for the price. It even costs less than my older keyboard and performs better. Truly a great keyboard!”
“U gave me a pink cable as a compensation even tho I am a boy”
Akko 5075B Plus vs AULA F75 Max specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
9 of 23 specs differ
Akko 5075B Plus
AULA F75 Max
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Akko 5075B Plus vs AULA F75 Max: your questions
The Akko 5075B Plus is listed with a 4500mAh battery, while the AULA F75 Max has a 4000mAh battery. However, the Akko's vendor description mentions a 3000mAh battery, creating a discrepancy. The AULA's vendor claims up to 30.5 hours with backlight on and 80 hours with it off.
The provided information for the AULA F75 Max does not mention support for QMK or VIA firmware. Its customization is handled through its own software for the screen, macros, and key remapping. The Akko 5075B Plus explicitly lists VIA support.
Yes. The Akko 5075B Plus metadata lists support for ISO-DE, ISO-UK, ISO-Nordic, and ISO-NO physical layouts, making it suitable for users in those regions who need specific keycap placements.
The AULA F75 Max comes with pre-lubed Leobog Reaper linear switches. The vendor specifies these are 5-pin switches with a 45gf trigger force and are made with POM stems and PC tops.
The AULA F75 Max is more portable. It weighs 960g compared to the Akko's 1500g, and its dimensions are slightly smaller (328mm long vs 335mm). It also stores its 2.4GHz receiver in a dedicated compartment.
Yes, both the Akko 5075B Plus and AULA F75 Max feature hot-swappable sockets. The Akko's vendor description specifies 5-pin sockets, while the AULA is listed as compatible with 3-pin and 5-pin switches.
According to the vendor, the Akko 5075B Plus includes an IXPE switch pad, silicone plate foam, and case foams pre-installed to enhance acoustics and reduce typing noise.
The AULA's TFT screen can display custom GIFs or images, control RGB lighting modes, and show system information like battery level, connection status, and time, according to the product description.
Yes. The Akko 5075B Plus uses ASA profile double-shot PBT keycaps and includes extra novelty keycaps. The AULA F75 Max uses Cherry-profile PBT keycaps with side-printed legends for shine-through lighting.
The Akko 5075B Plus lists multiple pre-installed foam layers (IXPE, silicone, case). The AULA F75 Max also promotes a creamy thocky sound using an IXPE pad, PET pad, and layered foams, but the specific foam types are less detailed than the Akko's listing.
Both keyboards support a knob, as listed in their 'Extra Features'. The AULA F75 Max includes a metal volume knob as a standard feature, while the Akko's listing indicates knob support without confirming it's included in the base package.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.











