Compare Redragon ANTONIUM K745 vs EISA MAX K686 Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between two feature-rich, budget-friendly Redragon keyboards. The choice hinges on whether you prioritize a traditional full-size layout with a lower price, or a more compact 96% design with tri-mode wireless connectivity. Both share a gasket mount, five-layer sound dampening, and hot-swap sockets, making the decision about core layout and connection philosophy.

Model
	67	70	Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	0.0 stars (0 reviews)	0.0 stars (0 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Released in 2025 Available in a 100% layout Supports Wired, Wired only connectivity Weighs about 1060 g Sized at 38 x 445 x 142 mm	Released in 2024 Available in a 90% layout Comes with a knob Compatible with both Mac and Windows Supports Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless connectivity Weighs about 1200 g Sized at 90 x 430 x 90 mm
Score	Scores Performance: 65 Build Quality: 67.7 Productivity: 73.7 Customizability: 60 Portability: 44.9	Scores Performance: 66.6 Build Quality: 63.6 Productivity: 83.8 Customizability: 67.4 Portability: 52
Name	Name Redragon ANTONIUM K745	Name Redragon EISA MAX K686
Release year	Release year 2025	Release year 2024
Switch Options	Switch Options Linear	Switch Options Linear
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 100%	Layout Size 90%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support	Display Support
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Wired, Wired only	Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless
Polling Rate	Polling Rate -	Polling Rate -
Battery capacity	Battery capacity -	Battery capacity -
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style Gasket Mount	Mount Style Gasket Mount
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight Rgb	Backlight Rgb
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material Plastic	Case Material Plastic
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material PBT	Keycaps Material PBT
Dimensions	Dimensions 38 x 445 x 142 mm	Dimensions 90 x 430 x 90 mm
Weight	Weight 1060g	Weight 1200g

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

Your primary need dictates the choice. If you require wireless freedom, a space-saving layout with a numpad, and convenient media controls, the EISA MAX K686 is worth the higher cost. If your budget is tighter, you work primarily at a single desk, and you rely on a full-size layout, the ANTONIUM K745 delivers excellent core features for less.

Redragon ANTONIUM K745

+Lower price point for a full-featured gasket mount keyboard.
+Full 108-key layout includes a numpad and four extra programmable hotkeys.
+Includes five specific sound dampening layers: PO foam, IXPE switch foam, PET sound pad, bottom socket foam, and silicone pad.
+Comes with extra red ESC and spacebar keycaps for customization.

−Wired-only connectivity limits placement and device switching.
−Larger 100% footprint requires more desk space.
−Lacks a control knob and dedicated Mac/Win toggle switch.

Redragon EISA MAX K686

+Tri-mode wireless connectivity via Bluetooth, 2.4GHz, and USB-C wired.
+Compact 96% (98-key) layout retains numpad in a smaller form factor.
+Features a dedicated control knob for media and backlight adjustment.
+Includes a side button for switching between Windows and Mac layouts.

−Higher price than the wired K745 model.
−Slightly heavier at 1200 grams.
−The compact layout may require adjustment for users accustomed to full spacing between key clusters.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The EISA MAX K686 is the more versatile choice, winning for office use, travel, and content creation due to its wireless modes, compact layout, and control knob. The ANTONIUM K745 is better suited for programming and budget-focused users who need a full numpad and dedicated keys. For gaming and modding, both keyboards are equally capable with their shared hot-swap and gasket-mounted foundations.

GamingTie

•Both keyboards feature hot-swappable sockets for switch customization.
•Both include software support for macros and keybindings.
•Both use linear switches (Dragon Chant and Mint Mambo) for smooth keystrokes.

OfficeRedragon EISA MAX K686

•The K686 offers tri-mode wireless connectivity (Bluetooth, 2.4GHz, wired) for device flexibility.
•Its 96% layout saves desk space while retaining a numpad.
•It includes a dedicated control knob for media and volume, and a Mac/Win toggle switch.

ProgrammingRedragon ANTONIUM K745

•The K745's 100% layout includes a full numpad and dedicated navigation cluster.
•It includes four extra programmable hotkeys for shortcuts.
•Its lower price point offers value for a dedicated desk setup.

TravelRedragon EISA MAX K686

•The K686's 90% layout is more compact than a full-size board.
•Wireless operation removes cable management concerns.
•It is slightly heavier (1200g vs 1060g) but the wireless functionality is a key advantage for mobility.

ModdingTie

•Both keyboards are hot-swappable, supporting 3-pin and 5-pin switches according to their listings.
•Both feature a gasket mount design and five layers of sound dampening foam (PO, IXPE, PET, socket, silicone).
•Both include a keycap & switch puller and four spare switches in the box.

Content CreationRedragon EISA MAX K686

•The K686's dedicated control knob provides quick access to volume and media playback.
•Wireless connectivity reduces cable clutter on a production desk.
•The Mac/Win support toggle allows easy switching between systems for cross-platform workflows.