Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head ยท Prices checked Nov 7, 2026

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE vs AULA AU75Wired Gaming vs Wireless All-Rounder

Choose the Attack Shark X68 HE for competitive gaming with its ultra-low latency and Hall effect switches, or the AULA AU75 for versatile wireless use and a premium typing feel.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE

Wired Gaming

Build quality in the bottom 40% of 65% boards under $100.

If you want

  • Aluminum case construction for durability.
  • 8000Hz polling rate and 0.125ms latency for competitive gaming.
  • Hall effect magnetic switches with adjustable actuation and rapid trigger support.

Rules this board out

  • Magnetic switches only. Standard MX switches will not fit.
  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
  • 65% layout. No function row and no numpad.

Get the

AULA AU75

Wireless All-Rounder

Build quality in the bottom 50% of 75% boards under $100.

If you want

  • Tri-mode connectivity with Bluetooth 5.0, 2.4GHz wireless, and wired USB-C.
  • Gasket mount structure with five layers of sound-dampening materials for a creamy typing feel.
  • 75% layout includes arrow keys and function row in a compact form.

Rules this board out

  • No numpad.

Bottom line

Your primary need dictates the choice. For tournament-level gaming where every millisecond counts, the wired Attack Shark X68 HE and its Hall effect switches are the dedicated tool. For a versatile keyboard that excels in office work, programming, and general use with excellent wireless connectivity and typing sound, the AULA AU75 is the more practical all-rounder. Consider the layout difference carefully, as the 65% vs 75% design significantly impacts key accessibility.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE

AULA AU75

  • Layout size

    65%

    75%

  • Hall effect (magnetic)

    Yes

    No

    Adjustable actuation helps in games and not in normal typing

  • Rapid trigger

    Yes

    No

    Faster resets help in games and not in normal typing

  • Connection

    Wired

    Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

    Wireless for several devices and wired for lower latency

  • Case material

    Aluminum

    ABS

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • ATTACK SHARK X68 HE
  • AULA AU75
Performance
92
80
Build quality
58
65
Productivity
59
85
Customizability
62
70
Portability
71
81

What they share

  • Hot-swappable
  • Keycaps: PBT
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The AULA AU75 wins in most productivity and general use categories due to its wireless flexibility, more functional layout, and focus on typing comfort. The Attack Shark X68 HE is the clear choice for competitive gaming where its high polling rate, Hall effect switches, and rapid trigger are critical. For modding, both offer strong foundations with hot-swap sockets, but with different structural approaches.

For gaming

Pick the ATTACK SHARK X68 HE

  • Wired-only 8000Hz polling rate and 0.125ms latency for minimal input delay.
  • Hall effect magnetic switches with adjustable actuation and rapid trigger support.
  • Aluminum case provides a solid, stable base for intense gaming sessions.

Full specs

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE vs AULA AU75 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

13 of 23 specs differ

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE

AULA AU75

Typing & switches

Switch options

Clicky, Linear, Magnetic
Linear

Hall effect (magnetic)

Yes
No

Rapid trigger

Yes
No

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

โ€”
Gasket Mount

Sound dampening

No
Yes

Layout

Layout size

65%
75%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Knob

No
Yes

Display

None
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

8,000 Hz
โ€”

Battery

Wired only
4,000 mAh

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum
ABS

Keycaps

PBT
PBT

Weight

950 g
980 g

Dimensions

60 x 150 x 350 mm
44 x 147 x 336 mm

Backlight

RGB, south-facing
RGB

Firmware & software

N-key rollover

No
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
Yes

Extras

Released

2025
2024

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

AULA AU752 stores

FAQ

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE vs AULA AU75: your questions

The Attack Shark X68 HE is designed for competitive gaming. Its vendor description highlights an 8000Hz polling rate, 0.125ms latency, and Hall effect magnetic switches with rapid trigger support, which are features aimed at minimizing input delay and allowing for adjustable actuation points.

Yes, the AULA AU75 supports Bluetooth 5.0 connectivity, allowing you to pair it wirelessly with mobile devices, tablets, and computers. It also includes a 2.4GHz wireless dongle and a wired USB-C connection for other devices.

Yes, both the Attack Shark X68 HE and the AULA AU75 feature hot-swappable sockets. This allows you to change the mechanical switches without soldering. The Attack Shark is compatible with N-pole downward magnetic switches, while the AULA comes with LEOBOG Star Vector linear switches.

The Attack Shark X68 HE uses a 65% layout, which typically removes the function row, navigation cluster, and numpad. The AULA AU75 uses a 75% layout, which compresses the keyboard but retains the function row and a column of navigation keys like Delete and Page Up/Down, offering more immediate key access without using layers.

The AULA AU75 is likely the quieter option. Its vendor description specifically mentions a "creamy" sound profile achieved through five layers of sound-deadening materials, including sandwich foam, IXPE switch pads, a PET acoustic membrane, bottom foam, and silicone pads. The Attack Shark listing does not mention any pre-installed sound dampening.

Yes, the product specifications for the Attack Shark X68 HE list Mac support. It connects via a wired USB-C cable.

Both keyboards use PBT keycaps. PBT plastic is known for being more durable and resistant to shine over time compared to ABS. The Attack Shark X68 HE uses double-shot PBT keycaps.

The AULA AU75 uses a gasket mount structure. This means the internal plate holding the switches is suspended on soft gaskets within the case, which aims to reduce vibration, provide a softer typing feel, and minimize noise compared to traditional tray-mounted designs.

Yes, because it uses Hall effect magnetic switches. The vendor description states it has an adjustable actuation point from 0.1mm to 3.4mm and supports features like Rapid Trigger and Dynamic Keystrokes, which rely on this analog capability.

The AULA AU75 has a dedicated multifunctional knob that, according to the vendor, can adjust volume and keyboard backlight. The Attack Shark X68 HE, with its 65% layout, likely requires using a function (Fn) layer key combination to access media controls, as it lacks a dedicated knob.

They are very close in weight. The AULA AU75 weighs 980g, while the Attack Shark X68 HE weighs 950g. The 30g difference is negligible, and both provide a substantial, non-slip feel on a desk.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.