ATTACK SHARK X68 HE vs AULA WIN68
Choose the X68 HE for its aluminum case and hot-swap switches, or the WIN68 for its lighter build and included sound-dampening cotton.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
from$89at WhatGeek
from$39at WhatGeek
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
ATTACK SHARK X68 HE
Rapid trigger
Build quality in the bottom 40% of 65% boards under $100.
- Aluminum case.
- Hot-swappable, with vendor-listed compatibility for N-pole downward magnetic switches.
- Rapid Trigger and vendor-listed RT accuracy of 0.01 mm.
- Magnetic switches only. Standard MX switches will not fit.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Get the
AULA WIN68
Build quality in the bottom 15% of 65% boards under $50.
- At 690 g, it is lighter than the X68 HE.
- Includes PO sandwich and bottom cotton, which the vendor says reduce keystroke noise.
- The vendor lists a metal plate, alongside the metadata’s plastic case material.
- Magnetic switches only. Standard MX switches will not fit.
Pick the ATTACK SHARK X68 HE if an aluminum case, hot-swap support, and its specified Rapid Trigger features matter most. Choose the AULA WIN68 if lower weight and included sound-dampening cotton are higher priorities. Both offer a wired 65% ANSI layout, Hall Effect switches, and an 8000 Hz polling rate.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
ATTACK SHARK X68 HE
AULA WIN68
Rapid trigger
Yes
No
Faster resets help in games and not in normal typing
Hot-swappable
Yes
No
Switch changes without soldering
Case material
Aluminum
Plastic
Switch options
Clicky, Linear, Magnetic
Linear, Magnetic
Weight
950 g
690 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
- ATTACK SHARK X68 HE
- AULA WIN68
- Performance
- 9286
- Build quality
- 5849
- Productivity
- 5974
- Customizability
- 6154
- Portability
- 7173
- Layout size: 65%
- Hall effect (magnetic)
- Connection: Wired
- Max polling rate: 8,000 Hz
What will you mostly use it for?
The X68 HE has the edge for gaming-focused feature flexibility, while the WIN68 is the more convenient choice for a lighter, dampened setup. Their shared 65% ANSI layout, wired USB-C connection, and listed Mac/Win support make them comparable for programming and content creation. For travel, the WIN68’s lower weight and smaller listed dimensions favor carrying it. Hot-swap support makes the X68 HE the clearer option for users who want to change switches.
Pick the ATTACK SHARK X68 HE
- Both list Hall Effect switches and an 8000 Hz polling rate.
- The X68 HE adds Rapid Trigger, and its vendor description specifies RT accuracy of 0.01 mm.
ATTACK SHARK X68 HE vs AULA WIN68 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
9 of 20 specs differ
ATTACK SHARK X68 HE
AULA WIN68
Switch options
Hall effect (magnetic)
Rapid trigger
Hot-swappable
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
ATTACK SHARK X68 HE vs AULA WIN68: your questions
Both list Hall Effect switches and an 8000 Hz polling rate. The X68 HE adds Rapid Trigger and vendor-listed RT accuracy of 0.01 mm, while the WIN68’s vendor description specifies accuracy that depends on switch option.
Yes, the X68 HE is listed as hot-swappable. Its vendor description specifies compatibility with N-pole downward magnetic switches.
Hot-swap support is not listed for the WIN68. Its vendor description names magnetic switch options including Graywood and Yongchun, but does not describe switch swapping.
The WIN68 includes PO sandwich and bottom cotton, which its vendor says reduce keystroke noise. Comparable sound-dampening materials are not listed for the X68 HE.
The AULA WIN68 weighs 690 g, while the ATTACK SHARK X68 HE weighs 950 g. Both are wired-only, so neither is described as a wireless travel keyboard.
Both are listed as 65% ANSI keyboards. Each has wired USB-C connectivity and lists Mac/Win support.
The X68 HE has an aluminum case, while the WIN68 has a plastic case. The WIN68 vendor description also lists a metal plate.
Both keyboards are listed with an 8000 Hz polling rate. The X68 HE vendor description also specifies a 128K scan sampling rate.
Yes, the X68 HE is listed with south-facing RGB, and its vendor description identifies 16M RGB backlighting. The WIN68 also has RGB backlighting, with its vendor describing single-key lighting customization and preset effects.
The vendor description names Graywood and Yongchun magnetic switches, and also provides details for XingYi. It lists RT accuracy of 0.02 mm for Yongchun and 0.04 mm for Graywood and XingYi.
The WIN68 has PO sandwich and bottom cotton, which the vendor says decrease keystroke noise. It is also lighter than the X68 HE, though both share a 65% ANSI layout and wired USB-C connectivity.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.