AULA F99 Pro vs Redragon EISA K686 Pro
Choose the AULA F99 Pro for its larger layout and specified 8000mAh battery, or the Redragon EISA K686 Pro for a more compact 90% layout.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
4.7 (41)4.7 · 41 reviews
from$68at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
No reviews
from$64at Redragon
Which one should you get?
Get the
AULA F99 Pro
Battery
Build quality in the bottom 50% of 96% boards under $100.
- 96% layout, with the vendor listing 100 keys and a rotary knob.
- 8000mAh battery capacity is specified.
- Vendor describes five sound-improving layers, including sandwich foam, an IXPE switch pad, PET film, bottom foam, and a silicone case pad.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- Compact full-size layout. The numpad is present, the gaps of a full-size board are not.
Get the
Redragon EISA K686 Pro
- 90% layout is the more compact listed format in this comparison.
- PBT keycaps are listed in the product metadata.
- Redragon specifies a 3.5mm PO sound-absorbing pad, two dampening foams, and a silicone gasket.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Choose the AULA F99 Pro if you want the larger 96% layout and a stated 8000mAh battery, or if the lighter listed weight matters. Choose the Redragon EISA K686 Pro if you prefer its listed 90% layout, PBT keycaps, and included spare switches and receiver. Both offer gasket mounts, linear switches, a knob, hot-swap support, and three connection modes.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
AULA F99 Pro
Redragon EISA K686 Pro
Layout size
96%
90%
Battery
8,000 mAh
4,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Case material
ABS
Plastic
Display
None
LED
A case display rather than a typing feature
Weight
1,023 g
1,200 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
- AULA F99 Pro
- Redragon EISA K686 Pro
- Performance
- 6678
- Build quality
- 6269
- Productivity
- 8383
- Customizability
- 6673
- Portability
- 6354
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Switch options: Linear
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Knob
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The AULA takes a narrow lead for office and programming use, where its listed 96% layout and known battery capacity are practical differentiators. It is also the lighter option of the two, though both weigh over a kilogram. Gaming and modding are close on the listed hardware, including linear switches, gasket mounts, and hot-swap support. For content creation, their shared connectivity and knob features make either a reasonable fit.
It's a tie
- Both use linear switches, gasket mounts, RGB lighting, and support wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4 GHz connections.
- Each has a control knob and hot-swappable switches, giving similar stated hardware flexibility for gaming setups.
AULA F99 Pro vs Redragon EISA K686 Pro specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
8 of 22 specs differ
AULA F99 Pro
Redragon EISA K686 Pro
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
- Check on Amazon
Amazon
Check price
AULA F99 Pro vs Redragon EISA K686 Pro: your questions
The AULA F99 Pro is listed with a 96% layout and an 8000mAh battery. The Redragon EISA K686 Pro is listed as 90% and has PBT keycaps.
The AULA F99 Pro has the larger listed layout at 96%, compared with 90% for the Redragon EISA K686 Pro. Redragon's vendor page describes its model as a 98-key keyboard, while the metadata lists its layout as 90%.
The AULA F99 Pro has a specified 8000mAh battery. The Redragon EISA K686 Pro's battery capacity is not listed, so a capacity comparison cannot be made.
Both support Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz wireless, and wired USB-C connectivity. The AULA vendor specifies Bluetooth 5.0, while Redragon's vendor description lists BT 3.0/5.0.
Yes, both are listed as hot-swappable. Each vendor specifies support for 3-pin and 5-pin switches.
The AULA F99 Pro is listed at 1023g, while the Redragon EISA K686 Pro is listed at 1060g. The difference is small, and both are over a kilogram.
PBT keycaps are listed for both keyboards. The AULA vendor also describes its keycaps as double-shot PBT.
AULA's vendor describes five sound-improving layers, including sandwich foam, an IXPE switch pad, PET film, bottom foam, and a silicone case pad. Redragon specifies a 3.5mm PO sound-absorbing pad, two dampening foams, and a silicone gasket.
Yes, both have knob support listed. Redragon's vendor says its knob controls backlight brightness and media functions, while AULA describes a rotary knob for its 96% layout.
The AULA F99 Pro is the more suitable pick if you want the larger listed 96% layout, and its vendor says the driver supports key remapping and macros. Choose the Redragon if its more compact listed 90% layout better fits your desk.
Redragon lists a detachable USB-C cable, nano receiver, keycap and switch puller, four spare switches, a sticker, and a user manual. Its vendor package list does not establish that these accessories are included with the AULA F99 Pro.
Both product listings specify Mac/Win support. Redragon's vendor also describes switching between Windows and Mac using a side button.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.