Compare AULA M75 vs Nova75 Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between two feature-rich AULA 75% keyboards at different price points. The choice is difficult because the more affordable Nova75 offers unique features like a smart display and a larger battery, while the M75 counters with a more premium aluminum construction and hot-swap capability. Your priority between material quality and flashy extras will determine the winner.

Model
			Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	0.0 stars (0 reviews)	0.0 stars (0 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Released in 2024 Supports hot-swappable switches Uses a Gasket Mount mounting style Supports Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless connectivity Equipped with a 8000 mAh battery Weighs about 1735 g Made with a Aluminum case	Released in 2025 Equipped with a 10000 mAh battery
Score	Scores Performance: 47.9 Build Quality: 54.9 Productivity: 50.7 Customizability: 52.7 Portability: 85.4	Scores Performance: 42.9 Build Quality: 37.4 Productivity: 42.4 Customizability: 44.7 Portability: 67.2
Name	Name AULA M75	Name AULA Nova75
Release year	Release year 2024	Release year 2025
Switch Options	Switch Options -	Switch Options -
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 75%	Layout Size 75%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support	Display Support
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless	Connection
Polling Rate	Polling Rate -	Polling Rate -
Battery capacity	Battery capacity 8000 mAh	Battery capacity 10000 mAh
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style Gasket Mount	Mount Style -
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight Rgb	Backlight Rgb
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material Aluminum	Case Material -
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material PBT	Keycaps Material PBT
Dimensions	Dimensions -	Dimensions -
Weight	Weight 1735g	Weight -

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

Select the AULA M75 if your budget allows for a heavier investment in material quality, a hot-swappable foundation, and a vendor-advertised low-latency edge. Opt for the AULA Nova75 if you value unique features like a smart display and volume knob, need the absolute largest battery, and are working within a more constrained budget, accepting a likely plastic build.

AULA M75

+CNC-machined 6063 series aluminum alloy case for a premium feel.
+Hot-swappable PCB for easy switch customization.
+Vendor-cited 3ms ultra-low latency for responsive gaming.
+Includes a five-layered internal padded structure with sandwich and silicone padding.
+8000mAh battery supports extended wireless use.

−At 1735g, it is notably heavy, which may affect portability.
−Lacks the smart display and volume knob found on the Nova75.
−Priced higher than the Nova75 based on listed price ranges.

AULA Nova75

+Features a 1.14-inch smart color display for customization and stats.
+Larger 10,000mAh battery capacity for longer life.
+Includes a multifunction volume knob for media control.
+Uses five-sided dye-sublimation PBT keycaps for detailed aesthetics.
+Vendor description mentions a six-layered internal padding for sound dampening.

−Not listed as hot-swappable in the provided metadata, limiting switch customization.
−Case material is not specified as aluminum, likely using plastic construction.
−Lacks the explicitly stated ultra-low latency specification of the M75.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The M75 takes categories where build material and hardware customizability are paramount, such as gaming, programming, and modding. The Nova75 wins in office use and content creation, leveraging its superior battery life, smart display, and convenient knob. For travel, the decision is a tie based on shared core wireless features and layout, though the M75's confirmed heft is a consideration.

GamingAULA M75

•The M75 vendor page cites a 3ms ultra-low latency response time.
•Its hot-swappable design allows for easy switch customization to gaming preferences.
•The aluminum case may provide a more stable, premium feel during intense use.

OfficeAULA Nova75

•The Nova75's larger 10,000mAh battery promises longer wireless use between charges.
•Its multifunction volume knob offers convenient audio control.
•The vendor description mentions a six-layered internal padding for quieter typing.

ProgrammingAULA M75

•The M75's hot-swappable sockets allow programmers to tailor switch feel for long typing sessions.
•Its aluminum build and listed weight of 1735g suggest a sturdy, non-slip typing platform.
•The standard 75% layout with arrow keys is preserved on both boards.

TravelTie

•Both share the same compact 75% ANSI layout.
•Both offer triple-mode connectivity (Bluetooth, 2.4GHz, wired).
•The M75 is confirmed to be heavier (1735g), while the Nova75's weight is not specified, making a direct portability call unclear.

ModdingAULA M75

•The M75 is explicitly listed as hot-swappable, a critical feature for modders.
•Its vendor description details a five-layered internal padded structure and FR4/PC plate options.
•The aluminum case is a more traditional and mod-friendly material compared to the Nova75's construction.

Content CreationAULA Nova75

•The Nova75's 1.14-inch smart display can show custom GIFs and system stats, useful for monitoring.
•Its vendor page highlights five-sided dye-sublimation PBT keycaps for aesthetic customization.
•The volume knob provides tactile control for audio editing workflows.