Compare AULA WIN60 vs WIN68 Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between two very similar, budget-friendly Hall effect gaming keyboards from AULA. The choice is difficult because both share identical core specs like 8KHz polling, magnetic switches, and sound-dampening foam. The decision hinges entirely on whether you prefer the ultra-compact 60% layout of the WIN60 or the slightly more functional 65% layout of the WIN68, which adds arrow and a few navigation keys.

Model
			Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	0.0 stars (0 reviews)	0.0 stars (0 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Available in a 60% layout Weighs about 630 g Sized at 37 x 109 x 302 mm	Available in a 65% layout Weighs about 690 g Sized at 37 x 109 x 321 mm
Score	Scores Performance: 84.4 Build Quality: 46.2 Productivity: 72 Customizability: 52.7 Portability: 71.2	Scores Performance: 84.7 Build Quality: 46.7 Productivity: 72.3 Customizability: 52.9 Portability: 71.4
Name	Name AULA WIN60	Name AULA WIN68
Release year	Release year 2024	Release year 2024
Switch Options	Switch Options Linear, Magnetic	Switch Options Linear, Magnetic
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 60%	Layout Size 65%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support	Display Support
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Wired, Wired only	Connection Wired, Wired only
Polling Rate	Polling Rate 8000 Hz	Polling Rate 8000 Hz
Battery capacity	Battery capacity -	Battery capacity -
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style -	Mount Style -
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight Rgb	Backlight Rgb
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material Plastic	Case Material Plastic
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material -	Keycaps Material -
Dimensions	Dimensions 37 x 109 x 302 mm	Dimensions 37 x 109 x 321 mm
Weight	Weight 630g	Weight 690g

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

Your choice should be dictated by your need for dedicated arrow keys. If you prioritize an ultra-minimalist setup and are comfortable using layers for arrows, the AULA WIN60 is the more space-efficient pick. If you require immediate access to arrow and navigation keys for work or content creation, the AULA WIN68 is the more practical option, as both share identical performance and build characteristics.

AULA WIN60

+More compact 60% layout saves significant desk space.
+Slightly lighter weight at 630 grams.
+Offers a Gray color option not listed for the WIN68.
+Includes the same high-performance 8000 Hz polling rate as the WIN68.
+Features PO sandwich and bottom cotton foam for a quieter typing sound.

−Lacks dedicated arrow keys, requiring a function layer for navigation.
−Missing dedicated navigation keys like Delete, Page Up, and Page Down.
−Fewer overall keys reduces out-of-the-box functionality for some workflows.

AULA WIN68

+65% layout includes dedicated arrow keys for convenient navigation.
+Adds useful navigation keys like Delete, Page Up, and Page Down.
+Retains the same 8000 Hz polling rate and Hall effect switch technology.
+Includes the same PO sandwich and bottom cotton sound-dampening foam.
+Offers Mac and Windows support for broad compatibility.

−Larger footprint (321mm long) than the WIN60.
−Slightly heavier at 690 grams.
−Vendor page lists fewer color options than the WIN60.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The WIN68 is the more versatile choice for productivity-focused tasks like office work, programming, and content creation due to its dedicated arrow and navigation keys. For pure gaming or maximum portability, the keyboards are functionally identical, with the WIN60 offering a smaller footprint. Modding potential appears equivalent, as both share the same core construction and pre-built nature.

GamingTie

•Both share an 8000 Hz polling rate for minimal input latency.
•Both feature Hall effect magnetic switches with adjustable actuation and 0% dead zone.
•Both include PO sandwich and bottom cotton foam for sound dampening.

OfficeAULA WIN68

•The WIN68's 65% layout includes dedicated arrow keys, which are often used in spreadsheet navigation.
•The WIN68 includes additional navigation keys like Delete and Page Up/Down for document editing.
•Both offer Mac and Windows support and include sound-dampening foam for a quieter environment.

ProgrammingAULA WIN68

•The WIN68's dedicated arrow keys are crucial for efficient code navigation without layer taps.
•The inclusion of Delete and other navigation keys can streamline editing workflows.
•Both keyboards have a similar typing experience with Hall effect switches and dampening foam.

TravelAULA WIN60

•The WIN60 is more compact, with dimensions of 302mm in length compared to the WIN68's 321mm.
•The WIN60 is slightly lighter at 630g versus the WIN68's 690g.
•Both are wired-only, but the smaller form factor of the WIN60 is easier to pack.

ModdingTie

•Both are pre-built keyboards with no mention of hot-swap sockets in the provided descriptions.
•Both share similar construction with PC cases and metal plates.
•Both feature the same internal sound-dampening materials (PO sandwich and bottom cotton).

Content CreationAULA WIN68

•Dedicated arrow keys on the WIN68 are beneficial for timeline scrubbing in video and audio software.
•The extra navigation keys can be mapped to common shortcuts in editing applications.
•Both offer single-key RGB backlight customization for visual setup personalization.