Which one should you get?
Get the
Shortcut Studio Bridge75
Premium Build
- Premium construction with an aluminum case and a brushed stainless steel weight.
- Supports both VIA and QMK for extensive, easy key remapping and macro creation.
- Larger 8000mAh battery capacity for extended wireless use.
- Limited availability, with vendor descriptions noting it can only be shipped within the US.
- Likely heavier and more expensive than the plastic-bodied F75.
- Lacks a dedicated multimedia control knob.
Get the
AULA F75
Gaming Features
- Includes a gaming-oriented Rapid Trigger feature.
- Features a multimedia control knob for quick media adjustments.
- Offers both north-facing and south-facing RGB LED options depending on the keycap set.
- Uses a plastic case construction, which may feel less premium than all-metal builds.
- Relies on proprietary Windows-only software for configuration, lacking VIA/QMK support.
- Smaller 4000mAh battery compared to the Bridge75.
Your primary need dictates the choice. For a keyboard that is a long-term modding platform with top-tier build quality and open-source firmware, the Shortcut Studio Bridge75 is the superior investment. If your budget is tighter and you want immediate gaming features like Rapid Trigger and a media knob, the AULA F75 delivers excellent value. Consider the Bridge75's potential shipping restrictions if you are outside the United States.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Shortcut Studio Bridge75
AULA F75
Case material
Aluminum
Plastic
Mount style
Plate Mount
Gasket Mount
Knob
No
Yes
QMK
Yes
No
VIA
Yes
No
- Shortcut Studio Bridge75
- AULA F75
- Performance
- 7364
- Build quality
- 7966
- Productivity
- 9092
- Customizability
- 8482
- Portability
- 8182
- Layout size: 75%
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Battery: 4,000 mAh
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The Bridge75 is the clear choice for programmers and modders due to its superior firmware support and build customization. The F75 takes the lead for gamers with its Rapid Trigger feature and for travelers due to its lower weight. Office users may prefer the Bridge75 for its larger battery and detailed sound dampening, while content creators have a split decision between the F75's knob and the Bridge75's programmability.
Pick the AULA F75
- The AULA F75 lists Rapid Trigger as a feature, which is a gaming-specific function.
- Both offer a 1000 Hz polling rate in wired and 2.4 GHz modes for low latency.
- Both have N-Key Rollover for simultaneous key presses.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Shortcut Studio Bridge75
No owner reviews collected yet.
AULA F75
509 owner reviews
“Works exactly as intended and still works as new. The 2.4 GHz Receiver doesn't communicate correctly and isn't reliable but on BT and Cable it works perfectly”
“I made an order for EPOMAKER x AULA 75 with express shipping on 27/1/24. Emailed the team TWICE. Now its 19/3/24, and i still dont have the item. Very poor service”
Shortcut Studio Bridge75 vs AULA F75 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
10 of 26 specs differ
Shortcut Studio Bridge75
AULA F75
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Shortcut Studio Bridge75 vs AULA F75: your questions
The Shortcut Studio Bridge75 has significantly broader software support. It is compatible with both VIA and QMK, which are cross-platform, open-source tools for remapping keys and creating macros. The AULA F75, according to its vendor downloads, uses proprietary software that only supports Windows.
Both keyboards emphasize sound dampening, but with different approaches. The Bridge75's listing specifies layers like INOAC Poron and EPDM foam. The F75's description mentions a five-layer system including two Poron foam layers and a PET sound pad. The actual sound is subjective and depends on switches and keycaps, but both are designed to reduce noise.
Yes. The vendor description for the Shortcut Studio Bridge75 explicitly lists compatibility with Windows, Mac, and Linux. Its programmability through VIA and QMK also works on these operating systems.
The Shortcut Studio Bridge75 has a listed battery capacity of 8000mAh, which is double the 4000mAh capacity of the AULA F75. With similar RGB and connectivity usage, the Bridge75 should theoretically offer significantly longer periods between charges.
The Shortcut Studio Bridge75 is more customizable. Its metadata lists multiple mount styles and plate materials, and it uses a hotswap flex cut PCB. The vendor description also details specific foam layers, appealing to acoustic modders. The F75 is hotswap and gasket mounted but offers fewer documented build variants.
No. The AULA F75's extra features and vendor downloads do not mention VIA or QMK support. Configuration is handled through proprietary Windows software provided by the manufacturer.
Rapid Trigger is a feature listed in the AULA F75's metadata. It is a gaming-oriented function that allows for faster actuation by resetting the keystroke trigger point dynamically, which can be beneficial for competitive gaming. The Bridge75 does not list this feature.
Both keyboards come with PBT keycaps, which are more durable and resistant to shine than ABS. The Bridge75's vendor specifies Cherry profile double-shot PBT keycaps. The F75's description also mentions Cherry profile double-shot PBT keycaps, suggesting similar quality in this component.
Almost certainly. The Bridge75 uses an aluminum case and stainless steel weight, while the AULA F75 has a plastic case and a listed total weight of 1023g. The Bridge75's all-metal construction will result in a substantially heavier keyboard, which adds stability but reduces portability.
According to the vendor description, there are restrictions. One listing explicitly states, "Due to vendor restrictions, this item can only be shipped within the US." International buyers should verify current shipping policies with retailers before purchasing.
The AULA F75 offers both options. Its technical specifications note that side-printed keycap versions have south-facing LEDs, while other keycap sets have north-facing LEDs. The Shortcut Studio Bridge75, according to its metadata and vendor description, uses south-facing RGB LEDs.
Yes, both come with the essentials for use and basic maintenance. The Bridge75 includes a dongle, USB-C cable, and a switch/keycap puller. The AULA F75 includes the keyboard, a 2.4G dongle, a Type-C cable, a 2-in-1 puller, and a user manual.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.












![[In Stock] Xinmeng M75/M75Pro 75% Pre-Built Mechanical Keyboard](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0549/0262/0278/files/O1CN01QqPe0g1sgA8RTJI6B___2215624025795.png?v=1741766474&width=3840&quality=75)