Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Oct 21, 2026

AULA F87 Pro vs MCHOSE K87

Choose the MCHOSE K87 for its larger battery and aluminum case accents, or the AULA F87 Pro for its specific five-layer sound dampening construction.

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

AULA F87 Pro

If you want

  • Vendor description highlights a five-layered sound-absorbing padding structure including IXPE and PORON Cotton.
  • Claims a 3ms response time according to its vendor page.
  • Includes adjustable double-level feet for ergonomic positioning.

And can live with

  • Smaller 4000mAh battery compared to the MCHOSE K87's 6000mAh.
  • Case material is listed as PBT and Silicone, lacking the aluminum accents of the K87.
  • Multi-OS support is not explicitly detailed in the provided specifications.

Get the

MCHOSE K87

Battery

If you want

  • Larger 6000mAh battery capacity for extended wireless use.
  • Case material combines Plastic and Aluminum, per the metadata.
  • Specifications explicitly list support for Windows, MacOS, and Linux.

And can live with

  • No user reviews are available in the provided metadata, making real-world feedback scarce.
  • The vendor description does not specify a polling rate or exact wireless latency figure.

Bottom line

For most buyers, the MCHOSE K87 is the more compelling choice due to its longer battery life, broader OS support, and inclusion of screw-in stabilizers. Consider the AULA F87 Pro if its specific five-layer sound-dampening construction and cited 3ms response time are your highest priorities, and you can accept a smaller battery.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

AULA F87 Pro

MCHOSE K87

  • Connection

    Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

    Wired, Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz

  • Battery

    4,000 mAh

    6,000 mAh

  • Case material

    PBT, Silicone

    Aluminum, Plastic, Polycarbonate

  • Weight

    1,023 g

    1,000 g

  • Screw-in stabilizers

    No

    Yes

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • AULA F87 Pro
  • MCHOSE K87
Performance
48
48
Build quality
47
69
Productivity
62
87
Customizability
52
66
Portability
69
85

What they share

  • Layout size: 80%
  • Hot-swappable
  • Mount style: Gasket Mount
  • Sound dampening
  • Keycaps: PBT
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The MCHOSE K87 holds a slight edge in more categories, primarily due to its explicit multi-OS support, larger battery, and inclusion of screw-in stabilizers. It wins for Office, Programming, Travel, and Modding use cases. The keyboards tie for Gaming and Content Creation, as both provide the core wireless, customizable features needed. The AULA F87 Pro's specific sound-dampening claim is a notable strength but is more situational.

For gaming

It's a tie

  • Both offer tri-mode connectivity (2.4 GHz, Bluetooth, wired) for low-latency options.
  • Both feature hot-swappable PCBs, allowing for switch customization to personal preference.
  • The AULA F87 Pro vendor page cites a 3ms response time, though the MCHOSE K87's latency is not specified.

From real owners

What owners say

Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.

AULA F87 Pro

4.8

12 owner reviews

Praise
“It’s nice but if it was with the volume thing on the top right like in the aula 75 it would be much better”
MzVerified buyer· via Epomaker
Critique
“When I charge the keyboard it only holds for like 10 hours and then I need to charge again”
Silas R.Verified buyer· via Epomaker

MCHOSE K87

No owner reviews collected yet.

Full specs

AULA F87 Pro vs MCHOSE K87 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

8 of 20 specs differ

AULA F87 Pro

MCHOSE K87

Typing & switches

Switch options

—
Linear

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
Gasket Mount

Sound dampening

Yes
Yes

Screw-in stabilizers

No
Yes

Layout

Layout size

80%
80%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Display

None
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Wired, Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz

Battery

4,000 mAh
6,000 mAhBetter

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

PBT, Silicone
Aluminum, Plastic, Polycarbonate

Plate material

Plastic
—

Keycaps

PBT
PBT

Weight

1,023 g
1,000 g

Dimensions

41 x 139 x 365 mm
30 x 135 x 370 mm

Backlight

RGB
RGB

Firmware & software

Mac & Windows

No
Yes

Extras

Released

2023
2024

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

AULA F87 Pro3 stores
  • EpomakerUS

    In stock
    $75Visit
  • MechkeysCN

    In stock
    $75Visit
  • AmazonGlobal

    Check price
    Visit
MCHOSE K874 stores
  • MechkeysCN

    In stock
    $75Visit
  • AmazonGlobal

    Check price
    ~$75Visit
  • ktechsSG

    Out of stock
    $80Visit
  • WhatGeekCN

    Out of stock
    $99Visit

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

FAQ

AULA F87 Pro vs MCHOSE K87: your questions

The MCHOSE K87 has a larger 6000mAh battery, while the AULA F87 Pro has a 4000mAh battery. This suggests the K87 will likely last longer on a single charge, though actual runtime depends on usage patterns and lighting settings.

The MCHOSE K87 explicitly lists support for Windows, MacOS, and Linux in its technical specifications. The AULA F87 Pro's vendor page mentions a driver for Windows, but broader OS compatibility is not detailed in the provided information.

The MCHOSE K87 includes screw-in stabilizers according to its listed extra features. The type of stabilizers on the AULA F87 Pro is not specified in the provided metadata or vendor description.

The MCHOSE K87 case uses a combination of Plastic and Aluminum. The AULA F87 Pro case is made from PBT and Silicone, according to its metadata.

The AULA F87 Pro vendor description mentions a five-layered sound-absorbing padding structure, including IXPE under-shaft padding and PORON Cotton. The MCHOSE K87 specifications list a six-layer structure comprising Plate Foam, IXPE Foam, PET Foam, Poron Foam, and Silicone Bottom Foam.

Yes, both keyboards feature hot-swappable sockets, allowing you to change mechanical switches without soldering. The AULA includes two spare switches, and the MCHOSE K87 also lists two spare switches in its package contents.

According to the MCHOSE vendor description, the K87 offers keycaps in both Cherry and OEM height profiles, depending on the color variant chosen. The keycaps are made from PBT using a double-shot process.

The vendor description for the AULA F87 Pro claims a 3ms response time. A corresponding response time specification is not provided for the MCHOSE K87.

Both are similar in weight and use an 80% layout. The MCHOSE K87 has a slight advantage with a slimmer 30mm height compared to the AULA F87 Pro's 41mm, and its larger battery may mean less need to pack a charging cable.

The AULA F87 Pro vendor page lists a driver download for Windows systems. The MCHOSE K87 specifications mention support for 'MCHOSE HUB', which suggests a configuration software or app, though the details are not elaborated.

The MCHOSE K87 package includes the keyboard, a user guide, a Type-C cable, a puller, two spare switches, and a dust cover, as per its specifications.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.