AULA F87 Pro vs MCHOSE K87
Choose the MCHOSE K87 for its larger battery and aluminum case accents, or the AULA F87 Pro for its specific five-layer sound dampening construction.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
4.8 (13)4.8 · 13 reviews
from$64at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
No reviews
from$75at Mechkeys
Which one should you get?
Get the
AULA F87 Pro
Build quality in the bottom 45% of 80% boards under $100.
- Vendor description highlights a five-layered sound-absorbing padding structure including IXPE and PORON Cotton.
- Claims a 3ms response time according to its vendor page.
- Includes adjustable double-level feet for ergonomic positioning.
Get the
MCHOSE K87
Battery
Build quality in the top 35% of 80% boards under $100.
- Larger 6000mAh battery capacity for extended wireless use.
- Case material combines Plastic and Aluminum, per the metadata.
- Specifications explicitly list support for Windows, MacOS, and Linux.
For most buyers, the MCHOSE K87 is the more compelling choice due to its longer battery life, broader OS support, and inclusion of screw-in stabilizers. Consider the AULA F87 Pro if its specific five-layer sound-dampening construction and cited 3ms response time are your highest priorities, and you can accept a smaller battery.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
AULA F87 Pro
MCHOSE K87
Connection
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Wired, Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz
Wireless for several devices and wired for lower latency
Battery
4,000 mAh
6,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Case material
PBT, Silicone
Aluminum, Plastic, Polycarbonate
Weight
1,023 g
1,000 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
Screw-in stabilizers
No
Yes
Easier to tune than the plate-mount stabs you get prebuilt
- AULA F87 Pro
- MCHOSE K87
- Performance
- 6048
- Build quality
- 5968
- Productivity
- 6286
- Customizability
- 5266
- Portability
- 6985
- Layout size: 80%
- Hot-swappable
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Sound dampening
- Keycaps: PBT
What will you mostly use it for?
The MCHOSE K87 holds a slight edge in more categories, primarily due to its explicit multi-OS support, larger battery, and inclusion of screw-in stabilizers. It wins for Office, Programming, Travel, and Modding use cases. The keyboards tie for Gaming and Content Creation, as both provide the core wireless, customizable features needed. The AULA F87 Pro's specific sound-dampening claim is a notable strength but is more situational.
It's a tie
- Both offer tri-mode connectivity (2.4 GHz, Bluetooth, wired) for low-latency options.
- Both feature hot-swappable PCBs, allowing for switch customization to personal preference.
- The AULA F87 Pro vendor page cites a 3ms response time, though the MCHOSE K87's latency is not specified.
AULA F87 Pro vs MCHOSE K87 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
8 of 20 specs differ
AULA F87 Pro
MCHOSE K87
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
AULA F87 Pro vs MCHOSE K87: your questions
The MCHOSE K87 has a larger 6000mAh battery, while the AULA F87 Pro has a 4000mAh battery. This suggests the K87 will likely last longer on a single charge, though actual runtime depends on usage patterns and lighting settings.
The MCHOSE K87 explicitly lists support for Windows, MacOS, and Linux in its technical specifications. The AULA F87 Pro's vendor page mentions a driver for Windows, but broader OS compatibility is not detailed in the provided information.
The MCHOSE K87 includes screw-in stabilizers according to its listed extra features. The type of stabilizers on the AULA F87 Pro is not specified in the provided metadata or vendor description.
The MCHOSE K87 case uses a combination of Plastic and Aluminum. The AULA F87 Pro case is made from PBT and Silicone, according to its metadata.
The AULA F87 Pro vendor description mentions a five-layered sound-absorbing padding structure, including IXPE under-shaft padding and PORON Cotton. The MCHOSE K87 specifications list a six-layer structure comprising Plate Foam, IXPE Foam, PET Foam, Poron Foam, and Silicone Bottom Foam.
Yes, both keyboards feature hot-swappable sockets, allowing you to change mechanical switches without soldering. The AULA includes two spare switches, and the MCHOSE K87 also lists two spare switches in its package contents.
According to the MCHOSE vendor description, the K87 offers keycaps in both Cherry and OEM height profiles, depending on the color variant chosen. The keycaps are made from PBT using a double-shot process.
The vendor description for the AULA F87 Pro claims a 3ms response time. A corresponding response time specification is not provided for the MCHOSE K87.
Both are similar in weight and use an 80% layout. The MCHOSE K87 has a slight advantage with a slimmer 30mm height compared to the AULA F87 Pro's 41mm, and its larger battery may mean less need to pack a charging cable.
The AULA F87 Pro vendor page lists a driver download for Windows systems. The MCHOSE K87 specifications mention support for 'MCHOSE HUB', which suggests a configuration software or app, though the details are not elaborated.
The MCHOSE K87 package includes the keyboard, a user guide, a Type-C cable, a puller, two spare switches, and a dust cover, as per its specifications.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.