AULA F75 Ultra vs Qwertykeys Neo75RGB or Metal Build Choice
Choose the AULA F75 Ultra for south-facing RGB, 1000 Hz wired and 2.4 GHz polling, and its 10000mAh battery; choose the Neo75 for metal case options, an ISO layout option, and multiple mounting styles.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
4.7 (3)4.7 · 3 reviews
from$72at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
4.8 (17)4.8 · 17 reviews
from$73at Divinikey
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
AULA F75 Ultra
Battery
Build quality in the top 35% of 75% boards under $100.
- South-facing RGB backlighting, with per-key adjustment and a top-left light bar described by the vendor.
- 1000 Hz polling rate listed for wired and 2.4 GHz modes.
- 10000mAh battery and a listed weight of 1100g.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
Get the
Qwertykeys Neo75
Build quality in the top 5% of 75% boards under $100.
- Aluminum, brass, copper, and steel case material options are listed.
- ANSI and ISO layout options, with the vendor describing tri-mode hot-swap ANSI or ISO configurations.
- DIY or barebones format with Poron gasket, silicone gasket, and top-mount options described by the vendor.
Get the AULA F75 Ultra for south-facing RGB, its listed 1000 Hz wired and 2.4 GHz polling, and the larger listed battery capacity. Choose the Qwertykeys Neo75 if you want metal case choices, an ISO layout option, or a DIY board with multiple mounting styles. The Neo75 also suits buyers who want a heavier listed build, while the F75 Ultra is the lighter of the two.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
AULA F75 Ultra
Qwertykeys Neo75
Connection
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
2.4 GHz, Wired, Bluetooth
Wireless for several devices and wired for lower latency
Battery
10,000 mAh
8,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Case material
ABS
Aluminum, Brass, Copper, Steel
Knob
Yes
No
Weight
1,100 g
2,200 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
- AULA F75 Ultra
- Qwertykeys Neo75
- Performance
- 8165
- Build quality
- 7294
- Productivity
- 8988
- Customizability
- 7885
- Portability
- 9191
- Layout size: 75%
- Hot-swappable
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- VIA
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The F75 Ultra is the more fitting pick for gaming, travel, and content creation if its listed polling rate, lower listed weight, battery capacity, or RGB matter most. The Neo75 is the stronger choice for modding, with DIY availability, multiple mounting styles, and a range of case and plate options. Programming depends partly on layout needs: the Neo75 offers ISO as well as ANSI, while both boards provide VIA support and hot-swap. For office use, the F75 Ultra's lower weight and larger listed battery capacity give it the edge here.
Pick the AULA F75 Ultra
- The F75 Ultra lists a 1000 Hz polling rate and the vendor specifies that this applies in wired and 2.4 GHz modes.
- It has south-facing RGB backlighting, while the Neo75 is listed without RGB.
- N-key rollover is listed for both boards.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
AULA F75 Ultra
3 owner reviews
“Keyboard sounds nice, works nice, the software is a bit of an issue to set up as there aren't any proper instructions but you just need the drivers and the VIA app.”
Qwertykeys Neo75
17 owner reviews
“The design is sleek, switches feel great, and I really appreciate how easy it is to switch the wireless connection from mac to PC”
“it was fine at first. then 4 days later my left shift button stopped working. this is poorly made clearly or i just hit the key too hard idk question mark anyways will be returning this unless i find a fix”
AULA F75 Ultra vs Qwertykeys Neo75 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
13 of 25 specs differ
AULA F75 Ultra
Qwertykeys Neo75
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
ISO layouts by store
Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.
AULA F75 Ultra
No ISO layout at the stores we track.
Qwertykeys Neo75
Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.
AULA F75 Ultra vs Qwertykeys Neo75: your questions
The F75 Ultra is the more gaming-focused choice in these listings, with a 1000 Hz polling rate specified for wired and 2.4 GHz modes. It also has south-facing RGB and N-key rollover; the Neo75 listing has no RGB, and its polling rate is not specified.
Yes. The F75 Ultra is listed with south-facing RGB, and its vendor describes per-key adjustable backlighting and a light bar at the top-left corner.
No, the Neo75 is listed without RGB. Buyers seeking per-key lighting can consider the F75 Ultra, which has south-facing RGB.
The Neo75 is listed in ANSI and ISO layouts, and the vendor describes a tri-mode hot-swap ANSI or ISO configuration. The F75 Ultra is ANSI only, so it is not offered in ISO-DE, UK, or other ISO variants.
The F75 Ultra is listed at 1100g, while the Neo75 is listed at 2200g. The vendor's Neo75 description also gives different case-only weights for its tri-mode and wired configurations.
The F75 Ultra is listed with a 10000mAh battery, and the Neo75 with an 8000mAh battery. These capacity figures do not establish how long either keyboard lasts between charges.
Both listings identify the boards as hot-swappable. The F75 Ultra vendor specifies support for 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches, while the Neo75 vendor describes hot-swap PCB configurations.
The Neo75 offers a DIY or barebones format and vendor-described Poron gasket, silicone gasket, and top-mount options. The F75 Ultra is listed as pre-built, with hot-swap and VIA support for customization.
Yes, VIA support is listed for both boards. The F75 Ultra vendor says its VIA setup uses a custom JSON file, while the Neo75 is also listed with QMK support.
The F75 Ultra lists 1000 Hz polling, with the vendor specifying that rate for wired and 2.4 GHz modes. A polling rate is not listed for the Neo75, so there is no like-for-like figure to compare.
The F75 Ultra's south-facing LEDs may leave shine-through legends dark, according to its compatibility note. The same note cautions that some sculpted keycaps can clip the LEDs.
The Neo75 listing names aluminum, brass, copper, and steel among its case materials, and aluminum, plastic, carbon fiber, FR4, and POM among its plate materials. The vendor description specifically lists aluminum and PP plate options, so confirm the selected configuration before ordering.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.