KBDFans Agar vs LUMINKEY Luminkey65
Choose the KBDFans Agar for its 60% HHKB-style layout, LED screen, and VIAL support; choose the LUMINKEY Luminkey65 for its 65% layout, ISO option, and 2.4 GHz wireless.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
5.0 (8)5.0 · 8 reviews
from$110at KBDfans
5.0 (3)5.0 · 3 reviews
from$10at Input Gear
Which one should you get?
Get the
KBDFans Agar
Build quality in the top 5% of 60% boards under $150.
- LED screen.
- VIAL support in addition to VIA.
- Polycarbonate case options, alongside aluminum options.
- No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
- Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Get the
LUMINKEY Luminkey65
Build quality in the top 5% of 65% boards under $150.
- 2.4 GHz wireless connectivity.
- ANSI and ISO layout options.
- QMK support and vendor-listed PC, aluminum, and FR4 plate options.
- 65% layout. No function row and no numpad.
Get the KBDFans Agar if you want its smaller 60% format, LED screen, VIAL support, or vendor-described HHKB layout. Choose the LUMINKEY Luminkey65 for its 65% layout, ISO option, 2.4 GHz wireless, and QMK support, features the Agar does not list. Both offer hot-swap support and VIA, so those shared capabilities are not a deciding difference.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
KBDFans Agar
LUMINKEY Luminkey65
Layout size
60%
65%
Connection
Bluetooth, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Wireless for several devices and wired for lower latency
Case material
Aluminum, Polycarbonate
Aluminum, Copper
Mount style
Gasket Mount, Plate Mount
Gasket Mount
Display
LED
None
A case display rather than a typing feature
- KBDFans Agar
- LUMINKEY Luminkey65
- Performance
- 6363
- Build quality
- 9091
- Productivity
- 8291
- Customizability
- 9094
- Portability
- 8487
- Hot-swappable
- Ergonomics: Split Backspace
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- VIA
- Sound dampening
- Keycaps: PBT
What will you mostly use it for?
The Luminkey65 is the more flexible fit for gaming over 2.4 GHz, office use, and content work, largely because of its 65% layout and connection or layout options. The Agar takes the programming pick for its vendor-described HHKB layout and VIAL support. For travel, its lower listed weight and smaller width give it the edge. Modders may prefer the Luminkey65 for QMK and its stated alternative plate materials.
Pick the LUMINKEY Luminkey65
- The Luminkey65 lists 2.4 GHz wireless alongside wired USB-C and Bluetooth.
- Its listed 1000 Hz polling rate applies to wired and 2.4 GHz modes, according to the vendor description.
KBDFans Agar vs LUMINKEY Luminkey65 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
14 of 24 specs differ
KBDFans Agar
LUMINKEY Luminkey65
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
VIAL
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
ISO layouts by store
Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.
KBDFans Agar
No ISO layout at the stores we track.
LUMINKEY Luminkey65
Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.
KBDFans Agar vs LUMINKEY Luminkey65: your questions
The Agar is a 60% keyboard with an LED screen and VIAL support. The Luminkey65 is a 65% board with ISO options and 2.4 GHz wireless.
No. Its compatibility information describes the 60% layout as lacking dedicated arrow keys, a function row, and a numpad.
Yes, the Luminkey65 is listed with ANSI and ISO layout options. The Agar does not offer ISO variants such as ISO-DE or UK.
The Luminkey65 lists 2.4 GHz wireless, Bluetooth, and wired USB-C connections. The Agar’s metadata does not list 2.4 GHz connectivity.
Both keyboards list hot-swap support. The Agar vendor description specifies a 1.6 mm non-flex-cut hot-swap PCB.
The Luminkey65 lists QMK support, while the Agar lists VIAL support. Both list VIA support.
The Agar is listed at 1300 g, while the Luminkey65 is listed at 1500 g. Their listed dimensions are 15 x 297 x 123 mm and 17 x 311 x 107 mm, respectively.
The Agar lists an LED screen. The Luminkey65 is listed without a screen.
Its vendor description identifies a standard PC plate, with aluminum or FR4 as alternatives. The product metadata lists a polycarbonate plate.
The Agar vendor describes its HHKB layout as suitable for programmers and lists VIAL support. The Luminkey65 has a 65% layout and lists QMK support, but no HHKB layout is specified for it.
Neither layout includes a numpad or function row, according to their compatibility information. The Agar is 60%, while the Luminkey65 is 65%.
Yes, both list VIA support. The Luminkey65 also lists QMK, while the Agar additionally lists VIAL.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.