Neo Ergo Alice vs Meletrix ZOOM64
Choose the Neo Ergo Alice for its ergonomic Alice layout, or the Meletrix ZOOM64 for magnetic switches and broader layout and plate options.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
from$128at Meletrix
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
Neo Ergo Alice
Build quality in the top 25% of 60% boards under $200.
- Ergonomic Alice layout with symmetrical alpha keys, according to the vendor description.
- Aluminum case with a magnetic ball-catch design and gasket mount.
- Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired USB-C connectivity, with a 2200mAh battery listed.
- No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
Get the
Meletrix ZOOM64
Hall effect
Build quality in the top 20% of 60% boards under $150.
- Magnetic switches and Hall Effect are listed features.
- ANSI and ISO layout options, with Split Backspace also listed.
- Plate options include aluminum, polycarbonate, POM, and FR4.
- Magnetic switches only. Standard MX switches will not fit.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Pick the Neo Ergo Alice if its Alice layout is the deciding factor, especially if you want its listed 2200mAh battery and the vendor-included carrying case. Choose the ZOOM64 if you want magnetic switches, ISO availability, or a choice of plate materials. Before buying the ZOOM64, confirm that magnetic switches and its south-facing LED behavior suit your planned switches and keycaps.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Neo Ergo Alice
Meletrix ZOOM64
Hall effect (magnetic)
No
Yes
Adjustable actuation helps in games and not in normal typing
Connection
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
2.4 GHz, Wired, Bluetooth
Wireless for several devices and wired for lower latency
Ergonomics
Standard
Split Backspace
Case material
Aluminum
Acrylic, Aluminum
Knob
No
Yes
- Neo Ergo Alice
- Meletrix ZOOM64
- Performance
- 6282
- Build quality
- 7677
- Productivity
- 6384
- Customizability
- 7078
- Portability
- 8687
- Layout size: 60%
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- VIA
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The ZOOM64 takes the gaming comparison on its magnetic-switch and Hall Effect feature set, and it also has the edge for programming and content creation through its layout options, plate choices, and knob support. The Neo Ergo Alice is the more distinct office pick for buyers who want an Alice layout. For travel, its listed battery capacity and included carrying case are practical differentiators. Modding favors the ZOOM64 for plate selection, though its magnetic-only switch rule is an important constraint.
Pick the Meletrix ZOOM64
- The ZOOM64 has magnetic switches and Hall Effect listed as features.
- Both keyboards list a 1000 Hz polling rate and wired connectivity.
Neo Ergo Alice vs Meletrix ZOOM64 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
11 of 25 specs differ
Neo Ergo Alice
Meletrix ZOOM64
Switch options
Hall effect (magnetic)
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
ISO layouts by store
Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.
Neo Ergo Alice
No ISO layout at the stores we track.
Meletrix ZOOM64
Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Neo Ergo Alice vs Meletrix ZOOM64: your questions
The Neo Ergo Alice uses an ergonomic Alice layout, while the ZOOM64 lists a standard 60% layout with ANSI and ISO options. The ZOOM64 also has magnetic switches and Hall Effect listed.
Yes, the Neo Ergo Alice is identified as an ergonomic keyboard and uses an Alice layout. Its vendor description also says the alpha keys are symmetrical to minimize the height difference between hands.
No, the ZOOM64 compatibility rules specify magnetic switches only. Standard MX switches will not fit.
Yes, the ZOOM64 lists both ANSI and ISO layout standards. The Neo Ergo Alice is ANSI, and its compatibility rules say ISO variants are not offered.
The ZOOM64 lists aluminum, polycarbonate, POM, and FR4 plate materials. The Neo Ergo Alice vendor description names Neo Ergo plates but does not list a comparable range of plate materials.
Both list Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz connectivity as well as wired use. The Neo Ergo Alice vendor description specifies USB-C for wired connection.
The Neo Ergo Alice metadata lists a 2200mAh battery. Its vendor description says the kit includes two 2200mAh batteries.
Both list VIA support. The Neo Ergo Alice vendor page also says it is programmable with VIA.
Its compatibility rules say the south-facing LEDs leave shine-through legends dark. Some sculpted keycaps can also clip the LED.
Both list hot-swappable support, but their switch compatibility differs. The ZOOM64 accepts magnetic switches only, while the Neo Ergo Alice is described as a hot-swap mechanical kit without a more specific switch restriction in its compatibility rules.
The Neo Ergo vendor listing names a keyboard carrying case among its free gifts. The listing also names a keycap and switch puller and a USB-C cable.
Both list wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4 GHz connectivity, along with a 1000 Hz polling rate. The Neo Ergo Alice vendor description specifically identifies USB-C wired connectivity.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.













![[In-Stock] Flux60 HE(Babao 60 HE)Module](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0607/2474/0287/files/WechatIMG4298.png?v=1768195930&width=3840&quality=75)