Qwertykeys Neo65 vs Weikav Weikave NUT75
Choose the Neo65 for ISO support, VIA and broader plate options, or the NUT75 for its 75% layout, knob and higher polling rate.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
5.0 (8)5.0 · 8 reviews
from$125at Divinikey
No reviews
from$105at ktechs
Which one should you get?
Get the
Qwertykeys Neo65
Build quality in the top 5% of 65% boards under $150.
- Supports ANSI and ISO layouts.
- VIA compatible, with hot-swappable options.
- Offers carbon fiber, aluminum, polycarbonate and plastic plate materials.
- 65% layout. No function row and no numpad.
Get the
Weikav Weikave NUT75
Battery
Build quality in the top 35% of 75% boards under $150.
- Lists an 8,000Hz polling rate for wired and 2.4GHz connections.
- Has a 10,000mAh battery and wired, 2.4GHz and Bluetooth connectivity.
- Includes a CNC aluminum volume wheel and magnetic pogo-pin PCB connection.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
- No numpad.
Choose the Neo65 if ISO support, VIA and the ability to select different plate materials and mounting styles are your priorities. Pick the NUT75 if you prefer a 75% layout with a volume wheel and prioritize its listed 8,000Hz polling rate. Check the NUT75's south-facing LED caveat against your keycap plans before buying.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Qwertykeys Neo65
Weikav Weikave NUT75
Layout size
65%
75%
Battery
2,200 mAh
10,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Max polling rate
1,000 Hz
8,000 Hz
Higher polling helps competitive FPS and does nothing for typing
Case material
Aluminum, Brass, Copper
Aluminum
Mount style
PCB Mount
Gasket Mount
- Qwertykeys Neo65
- Weikav Weikave NUT75
- Performance
- 5782
- Build quality
- 8774
- Productivity
- 6266
- Customizability
- 6879
- Portability
- 8678
- Hot-swappable
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The NUT75 has the clearest edge for gaming based on its higher listed polling rate, and its volume wheel and larger layout suit buyers who want dedicated media control. The Neo65 is a stronger fit when ISO support, VIA compatibility or choice of plate and mounting style matters. For travel, the Neo65's smaller layout category is the more compact option, though the listed information does not establish a direct weight comparison. Both support three connection modes and hot-swappable switches.
Pick the Weikav Weikave NUT75
- The NUT75 lists an 8,000Hz polling rate for wired and 2.4GHz use, compared with the Neo65's 1,000Hz polling rate.
- The NUT75 supports wired, 2.4GHz and Bluetooth connectivity.
Qwertykeys Neo65 vs Weikav Weikave NUT75 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
13 of 22 specs differ
Qwertykeys Neo65
Weikav Weikave NUT75
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
ISO layouts by store
Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.
Qwertykeys Neo65
Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.
Weikav Weikave NUT75
No ISO layout at the stores we track.
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
- Check on Amazon
Amazon
Check price
Qwertykeys Neo65 vs Weikav Weikave NUT75: your questions
The Neo65 is a 65% kit with ANSI and ISO support, VIA compatibility and multiple plate options. The NUT75 is a 75% kit with a volume wheel, south-facing RGB and a listed 8,000Hz polling rate.
The NUT75 lists an 8,000Hz polling rate for wired and 2.4GHz connections. The Neo65 lists a 1,000Hz polling rate.
Yes, the Neo65 supports ANSI and ISO layouts. The NUT75 is listed as ANSI only.
No, the NUT75's compatibility rules specify that it does not have a numpad. The Neo65 also has no numpad, as a 65% layout.
Both products list hot-swappable support. The Neo65 vendor description also specifies wired solder and hot-swap PCB options, plus a tri-mode hot-swap PCB.
The Neo65 is listed as VIA compatible. VIA support is not listed for the NUT75.
The Neo65 lists wired USB-C, Bluetooth and 2.4GHz wireless options. The NUT75 vendor description also lists wired, Bluetooth and 2.4GHz connectivity.
The NUT75's south-facing LEDs mean shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED. Consider this if illuminated legends or particular sculpted keycaps are important to your build.
The NUT75 lists a 10,000mAh battery, while the Neo65 lists 2200mAh. The Neo65 vendor description says its tri-mode hot-swap PCB includes two 2200mAh internal batteries.
Yes, the Neo65 lists carbon fiber, aluminum, polycarbonate and plastic plate options. The NUT75 vendor description specifies a flex-cut polycarbonate plate.
The NUT75 vendor describes a CNC aluminum volume wheel for media control. A volume wheel is not listed among the Neo65's features.
The Neo65 supports ISO layouts, while the NUT75 does not offer ISO variants such as ISO-DE or UK. Choose the Neo65 if ISO support is required.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.