Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67 vs Tech Bear Studio TB 65F
Choose the Pixel67 for ISO layout support and per-key RGB, or the TB 65F for four mounting options and a stated 1000 Hz polling rate.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
![[Pre Order] TB-65F Custom Mechanical Keyboard Kit](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1674/0405/files/2_9617dec6-d5ab-4eba-b35d-8b153f1e4991.jpg?v=1735210657&width=3840&quality=75)
Which one should you get?
Get the
Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67
QMK
Build quality in the top 10% of 65% boards under $200.
- Supports both ANSI and ISO layouts.
- Aluminum case and PP, FR4, and aluminum plate options are described by the vendor.
- Vendor listing specifies per-key RGB and tri-mode hot-swappable PCB.
Get the
Tech Bear Studio TB 65F
Build quality in the top 40% of 65% boards under $200.
- Lists four mounting systems: gasket with tadpole, gasket with spring capsule, classic gasket, and bottom mount.
- Specifies a 1000 Hz polling rate and an 8° typing angle.
- Quick-snap assembly provides access to the PCB assembly by removing the top housing.
- No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
Choose the Keykobo Pixel67 if you need ISO support, per-key RGB, or QMK and VIA support alongside several plate materials. Choose the TB 65F if its four mounting systems and stated 1000 Hz polling rate matter more than ISO availability and lighting.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67
Tech Bear Studio TB 65F
Ergonomics
Split Backspace
Standard
Display
LED
None
A case display rather than a typing feature
QMK
Yes
No
The deep option when you want to remap every key
Sound dampening
Yes
No
Layout standard
ANSI, ISO, ISO-DE
ANSI
ISO and JIS exist so regional layouts fit
- Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67
- Tech Bear Studio TB 65F
- Performance
- 7547
- Build quality
- 8671
- Productivity
- 8552
- Customizability
- 9471
- Portability
- 8881
- Layout size: 65%
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- VIA
What will you mostly use it for?
The TB 65F has the edge for gaming based on its explicitly listed polling rate, while the Pixel67 is the more flexible choice for office and programming layouts. Modders may prefer the TB 65F's range of mounting systems and quick-snap access, though the Pixel67 has QMK support and multiple plate choices. Travel is a close match because both listings mention carrying cases and wireless connectivity. The Pixel67's per-key RGB makes it the more suitable pick here for buyers who want keyboard lighting.
Pick the Tech Bear Studio TB 65F
- The TB 65F lists a 1000 Hz polling rate.
- Both keyboards offer wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4 GHz connectivity.
Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67 vs Tech Bear Studio TB 65F specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
11 of 22 specs differ
Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67
Tech Bear Studio TB 65F
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
ISO layouts by store
Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.
Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67
MonacoKeys
ISO-DE
Out of stockDoes not ship to you
Tech Bear Studio TB 65F
No ISO layout at the stores we track.
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
- Check on Amazon
Amazon
Check price
- Check on Amazon
Amazon
Check price
Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67 vs Tech Bear Studio TB 65F: your questions
Yes. The Pixel67 metadata lists ANSI and ISO, and the vendor describes ANSI/ISO Enter support among its layout options. The TB 65F is listed as ANSI-only.
No. Its compatibility rule says ISO variants, including ISO-DE and UK, are not offered. The Pixel67 supports ISO as well as ANSI.
The Pixel67 is listed with RGB, and its vendor description specifies per-key RGB. The TB 65F is listed without RGB.
The TB 65F listing specifies a 1000 Hz polling rate. No polling rate is listed for the Pixel67, so the figures cannot be compared directly.
Both are listed with Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz connectivity, as well as wired use. The Pixel67 vendor description also calls its PCB tri-mode.
The TB 65F offers four mounting systems and quick-snap assembly for access to its PCB assembly. The Pixel67 is also aimed at customization, with hot-swapping, QMK support, and PP, FR4, and aluminum plate options.
Yes, QMK support is listed for the Pixel67, alongside VIA support. The TB 65F listing specifies VIA support.
The vendor lists PP, FR4, and aluminum plate options for the Pixel67. The metadata also names plastic, FR4, and aluminum.
The TB 65F offers gasket with tadpole, gasket with spring capsule, classic gasket, and bottom mount. The vendor describes these as four mounting systems.
Both vendor listings include a carrying case. The Pixel67 listing also names a 2.4 GHz receiver, while the TB 65F listing includes a cable.
Yes. The Pixel67 metadata lists hot-swapping, and the vendor describes its PCB as tri-mode hotswap. The TB 65F is also listed as hot-swappable.
The TB 65F is the more straightforward choice if a stated polling rate is a priority, since its listing specifies 1000 Hz. Both keyboards offer wired and wireless connectivity, but no polling rate is listed for the Pixel67.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.