Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67 vs WOBKEY Crush80 Pro
Get the Pixel67 for QMK, ISO layouts and its compact 65% design; choose the Crush80 Pro for a TKL layout and PBT keycaps.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Which one should you get?
Get the
Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67
QMK
Build quality in the top 10% of 65% boards under $200.
- QMK support alongside VIA, with vendor-described remapping, layers and macros.
- Supports ANSI and ISO layout options, including ISO-DE.
- Integrated wrist rest, 6° typing angle and internal brass weight.
- 65% layout. No function row and no numpad.
Get the
WOBKEY Crush80 Pro
Build quality in the top 20% of 80% boards under $200.
- PBT double-shot keycaps.
- 80% TKL layout with a function row.
- 3750mAh battery.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
- No numpad.
Choose the Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67 for QMK, ISO layout support, and its integrated wrist rest and brass weight. Choose the WOBKEY Crush80 Pro if you want a TKL function row and PBT double-shot keycaps. The Pixel67 is the more adaptable pick for ISO users and builders who want QMK, while the Crush80 Pro prioritizes a larger layout and different keycap material.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67
WOBKEY Crush80 Pro
Layout size
65%
80%
Ergonomics
Split Backspace
Standard
Display
LED
None
A case display rather than a typing feature
Weight
2,870 g
2,400 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
QMK
Yes
No
The deep option when you want to remap every key
- Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67
- WOBKEY Crush80 Pro
- Performance
- 7568
- Build quality
- 8676
- Productivity
- 8566
- Customizability
- 9469
- Portability
- 8869
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Case material: Aluminum
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- VIA
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The Pixel67 takes the more compelling role for compact gaming, office typing and programming, with its polling-rate specification, ISO support and QMK. It also offers more explicitly described build options for keyboard modders. The Crush80 Pro is a better fit when a function row and PBT keycaps matter more than compactness or ISO availability. Both omit a numpad, and the Crush80 Pro's south-facing LEDs create a keycap compatibility consideration.
Pick the Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67
- The Pixel67 specifies a 1000 Hz polling rate and supports QMK.
- Its 65% layout is more compact than the Crush80 Pro's 80% TKL layout.
Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67 vs WOBKEY Crush80 Pro specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
13 of 23 specs differ
Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67
WOBKEY Crush80 Pro
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
- Check on Amazon
Amazon
Check price
- Check on Amazon
Amazon
Check price
ISO layouts by store
Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.
Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67
- Go to MonacoKeys
MonacoKeys
ISO-DE
Out of stockDoes not ship to you
WOBKEY Crush80 Pro
No ISO layout at the stores we track.
Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67 vs WOBKEY Crush80 Pro: your questions
The Keykobo Pixtendo Pixel67 is a 65% keyboard, while the WOBKEY Crush80 Pro is an 80% TKL board. The Pixel67's smaller layout omits the function row.
Yes, the Pixel67 supports ISO layouts, and the vendor lists a fully assembled ISO-DE QWERTZ option. The Crush80 Pro is ANSI only.
The Crush80 Pro is an 80% TKL keyboard, which provides a function row. The Pixel67's 65% layout does not include one.
The Pixel67 supports both QMK and VIA. The Crush80 Pro is listed as VIA compatible, with no QMK support specified.
Both keyboards are listed as hot-swappable. The Pixel67 vendor describes its hot-swap PCB as allowing switch changes without soldering.
The Pixel67's fully assembled version uses ABS double-shot keycaps. The Crush80 Pro uses PBT double-shot keycaps.
The Crush80 Pro has south-facing LEDs. Its compatibility notes warn that shine-through legends stay dark and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Yes, the Pixel67 is offered as a barebone kit as well as fully assembled ANSI and ISO-DE versions. The barebone kit does not include switches, keycaps or stabilizers.
The Pixel67 has an integrated wrist rest formed by its extended front case. No integrated wrist rest is listed for the Crush80 Pro.
Both models list Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz wireless and wired connectivity. The Pixel67 vendor specifies USB-C for its wired connection.
The Crush80 Pro is listed at 2400g, while the Pixel67 is listed at 2870g. The Pixel67 vendor describes its weight as including switches and keycaps in the assembled build.
No, the Crush80 Pro is listed as ANSI only, with ISO variants such as ISO-DE and UK not offered. The Pixel67 supports ANSI and ISO layout options.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.