Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Nov 10, 2026

Qwertykeys Neo75 CU vs Meletrix Zoom75 TIGADual Mount vs Four Mounts

Choose the Neo75 CU for its copper-or-brass bottom and dual-mount design, or the Zoom75 TIGA for its screen, RGB, and four mounting systems.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

Qwertykeys Neo75 CU

Dual Mount

Build quality in the top 40% of 75% boards under $300.

If you want

  • Copper-or-brass bottom case options give the Neo75 CU a distinct material choice.
  • Vendor-described dual mounting combines gasket mount and isolated bottom mount.
  • Tool-free ball-catch case access with magnetic connectors supports convenient opening.

Get the

Meletrix Zoom75 TIGA

Four Mounts

Build quality in the top 10% of 75% boards under $300.

If you want

  • Four mounting systems are listed, including top mount, split o-ring, elastic bar silicone, and silica gel particle mounting.
  • The screen module, knob module, and RGB lighting add features absent from the Neo75 CU.
  • The Zoom75 TIGA supports both QMK and VIA.

Bottom line

Pick the Qwertykeys Neo75 CU if the copper-or-brass bottom and its gasket plus isolated bottom-mount configuration are the main draw. Choose the Meletrix Zoom75 TIGA if you want a screen, RGB, QMK support, and more mounting and accessory options. Both are barebones kits, so plan to source switches and keycaps separately.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

Qwertykeys Neo75 CU

Meletrix Zoom75 TIGA

  • Mount style

    Gasket Mount

    Top Mount

  • Knob

    No

    Yes

  • Display

    None

    Yes

    A case display rather than a typing feature

  • QMK

    No

    Yes

    The deep option when you want to remap every key

  • Sound dampening

    No

    Yes

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • Qwertykeys Neo75 CU
  • Meletrix Zoom75 TIGA
Performance
57
74
Build quality
72
86
Productivity
62
90
Customizability
69
95
Portability
77
91

What they share

  • Layout size: 75%
  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • Case material: Aluminum
  • Weight: 3,000 g
  • VIA
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The Zoom75 TIGA has the edge for office tasks, programming, modding, and content creation, mainly through its screen, QMK support, and broader mounting and add-on options. For gaming, its RGB and screen give it more listed features, though the shared connection options alone do not settle performance. Travel is a close call: both are listed at the same weight and offer wireless modes, while their battery and included carrying or receiver details differ. The Neo75 CU remains distinctive for its copper-or-brass bottom and combined gasket and isolated bottom-mount approach.

For gaming

Pick the Meletrix Zoom75 TIGA

  • The Zoom75 TIGA supports wired USB-C, Bluetooth, and 2.4 GHz connections.
  • Its RGB lighting is listed, while the Neo75 CU has no per-key RGB.
  • The Zoom75 includes a screen module, adding a display feature absent from the Neo75 CU.

Full specs

Qwertykeys Neo75 CU vs Meletrix Zoom75 TIGA specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

10 of 22 specs differ

Qwertykeys Neo75 CU

Meletrix Zoom75 TIGA

Typing & switches

Switch options

—
Clicky, Linear, Tactile

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
Top Mount

Sound dampening

No
Yes

Screw-in stabilizers

No
Yes

Layout

Layout size

75%
75%

Layout standard

ANSI, ISO
ANSI, ISO

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Knob

No
Yes

Display

None
Yes

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Battery

—
8,000 mAh

USB-C

No
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum
Aluminum

Plate material

Aluminum, CarbonFiber, FR4, Polycarbonate, POM
Aluminum, FR4, Plastic, POM

Weight

3,000 g
3,000 g

Dimensions

—
18 x 324 mm

Typing angle

—
7°

Backlight

None
RGB

Firmware & software

QMK

No
Yes

VIA

Yes
Yes

Extras

Released

2026
2024

For EU buyers

ISO layouts by store

Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.

Qwertykeys Neo75 CU

Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.

Meletrix Zoom75 TIGA

Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

FAQ

Qwertykeys Neo75 CU vs Meletrix Zoom75 TIGA: your questions

The Neo75 CU centers on a copper-or-brass bottom and a dual-mount system combining gasket and isolated bottom mount. The Zoom75 TIGA instead offers four mounting systems, plus a screen module and RGB lighting.

Both list Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz wireless connectivity, as well as wired use. The Neo75 CU vendor description specifies that Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz depend on selecting its tri-mode PCB.

The Neo75 CU is listed without a screen or per-key RGB. The Zoom75 TIGA includes a screen module and is listed with RGB lighting.

Yes, the Zoom75 TIGA vendor listing names both QMK and VIA support. The Neo75 CU is listed as VIA-compatible.

The Zoom75 TIGA offers four mounting systems: top mount, split o-ring, elastic bar silicone, and silica gel particle mounting. The Neo75 CU vendor description gives it two approaches, gasket mount and isolated bottom mount.

The Neo75 CU product listing names POM, FR4, aluminum, carbon fiber, and polycarbonate plates. The Zoom75 TIGA vendor says buyers select a plate material, but the listing does not specify the available materials.

Both are listed as hot-swappable. The Neo75 CU vendor description also identifies tri-mode and wired hot-swap PCB options, while the Zoom75 TIGA is sold as a DIY barebones kit.

No. The Neo75 CU vendor description says switches and keycaps are sold separately, and the Zoom75 TIGA listing also identifies it as barebones without switches or keycaps.

The Zoom75 TIGA is listed with an 8000mAh battery, and its vendor kit contents specify two lithium batteries. The Neo75 CU vendor description specifies two 2200mAh batteries for the tri-mode PCB option.

Both use ball-catch case access, according to their vendor descriptions. The Neo75 CU specifically describes tool-free opening with magnetic connectors, while the Zoom75 TIGA uses its ball-catch system for changing among mounting options.

Both product listings give a weight of 3000g. The Neo75 CU vendor also provides different build weights depending on PCB configuration, so check the selected build details if that measurement matters.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.