Redragon TERRAFLARE K762 Pro vs UCAL K673Full-Size vs 75% Layout Choice
Choose the K762 Pro for a full-size layout with a screen and hot-swap, or the K673 for a more compact, portable 75% form factor.
Which one should you get?
Get the
Redragon TERRAFLARE K762 Pro
Full-Size
- Full-size 104-key layout with dedicated numpad.
- 1.41-inch TFT screen for displaying information and custom GIFs.
- Hot-swappable sockets compatible with 3-pin and 5-pin switches.
- Larger and heavier (443mm, 1350g), less portable.
- No explicit polling rate is listed in its specifications.
- The vendor description does not specify the keycap material for the K673, making a direct comparison unclear.
Get the
Redragon UCAL K673
75% Layout Choice
- Compact 75% layout (335mm long) saves considerable desk space.
- Lighter weight (1240g) enhances portability.
- Explicitly lists a 1000 Hz polling rate for its wired connection.
- Lacks hot-swappable switch sockets.
- No integrated screen for information display or customization.
- Vendor description specifies a QWERTZ layout for German users, which may be less common.
Your primary need dictates the choice. If you require a numpad, want to customize switches, and value the novelty of a small screen, the TERRAFLARE K762 Pro is the more feature-complete board for a stationary setup. If saving desk space and improving portability are your highest priorities, the more compact and slightly lighter UCAL K673 is the better tool, especially if you do not need hot-swap functionality.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Redragon TERRAFLARE K762 Pro
Redragon UCAL K673
Layout size
100%
75%
Hot-swappable
Yes
No
Display
TFT
None
Weight
1,350 g
1,240 g
Media keys
No
Yes
- Redragon TERRAFLARE K762 Pro
- Redragon UCAL K673
- Performance
- 6663
- Build quality
- 6958
- Productivity
- 8363
- Customizability
- 7354
- Portability
- 5373
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Battery: 4,000 mAh
- Case material: Plastic
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Knob
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The TERRAFLARE K762 Pro wins for stationary use cases that benefit from a full numpad, extensive modding potential, and its unique screen. The UCAL K673 is the clear choice for travel and any situation where desk space is limited due to its 75% form factor. For programming, the choice is a tie and comes down to personal preference for layout compactness versus dedicated number input.
Pick the Redragon TERRAFLARE K762 Pro
- Full-size layout includes a dedicated numpad for macros or in-game commands.
- Includes a 1.41-inch TFT screen for displaying system info or custom GIFs.
- Hot-swappable sockets allow for easy switch replacement to tailor actuation.
Redragon TERRAFLARE K762 Pro vs UCAL K673 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
7 of 21 specs differ
Redragon TERRAFLARE K762 Pro
Redragon UCAL K673
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Redragon TERRAFLARE K762 Pro vs UCAL K673: your questions
Only the TERRAFLARE K762 Pro features hot-swappable sockets. The manufacturer states its sockets are compatible with nearly all 3-pin and 5-pin switches. The UCAL K673 product listing does not mention hot-swap capability.
Yes, the K762 Pro includes a 1.41-inch TFT screen. According to Redragon, this 'Smart Info-Island' can display keyboard information, connection mode, battery level, and custom GIFs or memes.
The K762 Pro is a full-size 104-key keyboard measuring 443mm in length. The K673 is a 75% keyboard with 81 keys and a length of 335mm, making it over 100mm shorter and significantly more compact.
Yes, both the K762 Pro and the K673 offer tri-mode connectivity. This includes a USB-C wired connection, Bluetooth, and a 2.4 GHz wireless mode using an included nano receiver.
The K762 Pro uses custom Linear Mint Mambo switches. The K673 uses Linear Red switches. Both are linear switch types, offering a smooth keystroke without a tactile bump.
The UCAL K673 is better for a small desk due to its 75% layout. Its compact 335mm length frees up substantial space for mouse movement compared to the 443mm long full-size K762 Pro.
Yes, both keyboards support software for customization. The K762 Pro's software allows for designing lighting effects and macros, and syncing the on-screen time. The K673 listing also states it supports software adjustment.
The K762 Pro package includes the keyboard, a detachable USB Type-C cable, a nano receiver, a keycap and switch puller, eight spare switches, a Redragon sticker, and a user manual.
The K762 Pro is listed with five sound-absorbing pads: 3.5mm PO foam, IXPE switch foam, a PET sound pad, bottom socket foam, and a silicone bottom pad. The K673 uses 3.5mm PO foam and a thick silicone pad under the PCB for noise reduction.
The K673 vendor description does not explicitly list Mac compatibility. The K762 Pro, however, specifically mentions Mac/Win support with a side toggle button for seamless switching between operating systems.
Only the UCAL K673 has a specified polling rate of 1000 Hz listed in its metadata. The polling rate for the TERRAFLARE K762 Pro is not stated in the provided specifications.
The TERRAFLARE K762 Pro uses PBT shine-through keycaps. The keycap material for the UCAL K673 is not specified in its provided metadata or vendor description, so a direct comparison cannot be made.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.