Attack Shark vs AULA: Hall Effect Speed or Wireless Convenience?
Attack Shark pushes Hall Effect magnetic switches into the budget tier, while AULA wraps Rapid Trigger in a wireless gasket-mount package. We compare their best keyboards for gaming and daily use.
All featured products are independently selected by me. However, when you buy something through my affiliate links, I may earn a small commission. This helps support my work and allows me to continue providing free content to you.
Featured in this article
When comparing Attack Shark vs AULA, Attack Shark leads in raw gaming speed with Hall Effect magnetic switches and up to 8000 Hz polling, while AULA offers more versatile wireless keyboards with Rapid Trigger at aggressive prices.
Attack Shark has gone all-in on magnetic switch technology. Their wired boards deliver Hall Effect switches with adjustable actuation and polling rates up to 8000 Hz, targeting players who want the fastest input at the lowest price. AULA took a different bet: wireless gasket-mount keyboards with Rapid Trigger baked into traditional mechanical switches. The result is a lineup that works for office work as well as gaming.
In an Attack Shark vs AULA matchup, the choice comes down to what you value more: raw Hall Effect performance on a wire, or wireless freedom with Rapid Trigger included. Here's how their top models compare.
Best Attack Shark for Gaming: K85
ATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85
The K85 makes a strong first impression. Pick it up and the aluminum case feels genuinely premium, not something you usually associate with budget Hall Effect boards. Underneath, gasket mount construction adds some flex to the typing feel, and the magnetic switches let you set your own actuation point for each key. Rapid Trigger is included, screw-in stabilizers keep the larger keys stable, and a rotary knob handles media controls.
The catch? It's wired only. For competitive gamers who play at a desk and want zero wireless overhead, that's actually fine, maybe even preferred. PBT keycaps provide grip and durability, and the 75% layout keeps things compact without losing the function row. Compared to AULA's F75, the K85 trades wireless convenience for Hall Effect speed and 8000 Hz polling. At its price, the K85 punches well above expectations in terms of materials and switch technology.
| Specs | |
|---|---|
| Name | ATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85 |
| Release year | 2024 |
| Switch Options | Magnetic |
| Profile | Normal Profile |
| Hot Swappable | |
| Layout Size | 75% |
| Layout Standard | ANSI |
| Layout Ergonomics | Normal |
| Show all | |
The Crowd Favorite: AULA F75
AULA F75
It's hard to argue with numbers: over 2,253 reviews, a 4.6-star average, and a 6.3 popularity score make the F75 the most proven keyboard in this matchup by a wide margin. AULA managed to cram Rapid Trigger into a wireless gasket-mount 75% keyboard at a price that made people double-check the listing. Aluminum and plastic case options mean you can spend a little more for premium materials or keep costs minimal.
Where the K85 relies on Hall Effect switches for its speed, the F75 achieves Rapid Trigger through firmware on traditional mechanical switches, and adds Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz wireless, and a 4000mAh battery on top. In Attack Shark vs AULA terms, the F75 is the wireless alternative: hot-swappable sockets, PBT keycaps, a rotary knob, and N-key rollover are all present. The F75 isn't trying to be the fastest keyboard on the market. It's trying to be the most useful, and for most people, that's the smarter buy.
| Specs | |
|---|---|
| Name | AULA F75 |
| Release year | 2023 |
| Switch Options | Silent, Linear |
| Profile | Normal Profile |
| Hot Swappable | |
| Layout Size | 75% |
| Layout Standard | ANSI |
| Layout Ergonomics | Normal |
| Show all | |
Cheapest Hall Effect Entry: Attack Shark X68 HE
ATTACK SHARK X68 HE
If you want to try Hall Effect switches without committing much money, the X68 HE is about as cheap as magnetic switch keyboards get. It's a 65% wired board with an aluminum case, 8000 Hz polling, Rapid Trigger, and adjustable actuation, the core features competitive players actually care about, with almost everything else stripped away.
The compact layout gives you maximum mouse room, and PBT keycaps add some quality to the typing surface. There's no wireless, no massive battery, no screen, just raw Hall Effect performance in a small, solid package. AULA has no direct equivalent: their cheapest boards are wireless first and skip magnetic switches. Think of the X68 HE as the keyboard equivalent of a track-day car: not luxurious, not versatile, but incredibly fast for the money.
| Specs | |
|---|---|
| Name | ATTACK SHARK X68 HE |
| Release year | 2025 |
| Switch Options | Linear, Clicky, Magnetic |
| Profile | Normal Profile |
| Hot Swappable | |
| Layout Size | 65% |
| Layout Standard | ANSI |
| Layout Ergonomics | Normal |
| Show all | |
AULA's Do-It-All: F99
AULA F99
The F99 is for people who refuse to own two keyboards. The 96% layout includes a numpad for productivity work, gasket mount and sound dampening make it comfortable for hours of typing, and Rapid Trigger means you don't need a separate gaming board when the workday ends. The 8000mAh battery is genuinely impressive, you can go weeks between charges with moderate use.
Reviewers rate it 4.8 out of 5, which puts it among the highest-rated keyboards in either brand's lineup. That versatility is the F99's biggest strength and the clearest contrast with Attack Shark: where their boards are built for one job, the F99 handles everything you throw at it, all without a cable.
| Specs | |
|---|---|
| Name | AULA F99 |
| Release year | 2023 |
| Switch Options | Linear |
| Profile | Normal Profile |
| Hot Swappable | |
| Layout Size | 96% |
| Layout Standard | ANSI |
| Layout Ergonomics | Normal |
| Show all | |
Attack Shark Goes Wireless: K86
ATTACK SHARK K86
The K86 is Attack Shark's attempt at a wireless keyboard, and it's a bit of an odd one out. Instead of Hall Effect switches, it runs traditional linear mechanical switches, which means no adjustable actuation and no Hall Effect Rapid Trigger. What you do get is an aluminum case, a TFT display, gasket mount, and tri-mode wireless with a 4000mAh battery.
It's essentially Attack Shark borrowing the playbook of brands like Ajazz and Epomaker: feature-rich wireless board with a screen at a competitive price. Compared to AULA's wireless lineup, the K86 lacks Rapid Trigger and Hall Effect, so it doesn't match their gaming chops. If you just want a solid wireless keyboard with a screen and aluminum build, it holds its own.
| Specs | |
|---|---|
| Name | ATTACK SHARK K86 |
| Release year | 2024 |
| Switch Options | Linear |
| Profile | Normal Profile |
| Hot Swappable | |
| Layout Size | 75% |
| Layout Standard | ANSI |
| Layout Ergonomics | Normal |
| Show all | |
AULA's Budget TKL: F87
AULA F87
The F87 answers a simple question: how cheap can an AULA keyboard get while still feeling like an AULA keyboard? Pretty cheap, it turns out. Gasket mount, tri-mode wireless, 4000mAh battery, hot-swap sockets, and PBT keycaps all survive the cost-cutting. What got dropped? RGB lighting and the aluminum case option. The result is a clean 80% TKL that doesn't look or feel like a bare-bones budget board.
For gamers who want a wireless keyboard with dedicated function and arrow keys without paying for extras they don't need, the F87 makes a lot of sense. It doesn't have the Hall Effect switches that define Attack Shark's identity, but it offers wireless convenience that Attack Shark's gaming-focused boards simply can't match.
| Specs | |
|---|---|
| Name | AULA F87 |
| Release year | 2025 |
| Switch Options | Linear |
| Profile | Normal Profile |
| Hot Swappable | |
| Layout Size | 80% |
| Layout Standard | ANSI |
| Layout Ergonomics | Normal |
| Show all | |
AULA's Full-Key Wireless: F98
AULA F98
The F98 gives you a 98% key layout, basically a full-size board with a narrower footprint. Gasket mount, sound dampening, 4000mAh battery, tri-mode wireless, and hot-swappable switches make it a capable daily driver. It skips Rapid Trigger, which the F75 and F99 include, but keeps everything else that makes AULA keyboards comfortable to type on.
Compared to Attack Shark's wired Hall Effect lineup, the F98 lives in a completely different world. It's not built for competitive gaming speed, it's built for people who want a reliable wireless keyboard with all their keys accounted for, a comfortable typing feel, and a price that doesn't sting. Different tool for a different job.
| Specs | |
|---|---|
| Name | AULA F98 |
| Release year | 2025 |
| Switch Options | Linear |
| Profile | Normal Profile |
| Hot Swappable | |
| Layout Size | 98% |
| Layout Standard | ANSI |
| Layout Ergonomics | Normal |
| Show all | |
Attack Shark vs AULA: Which Brand Should You Choose?
Attack Shark suits competitive FPS players who prioritize input speed and play at a desk. AULA suits users who want one wireless keyboard for both work and gaming, or anyone who values cable-free setups over maximum polling rates.
For competitive FPS with Hall Effect magnetic switches and 8000 Hz polling, choose Attack Shark. For daily wireless use with Rapid Trigger included, choose AULA. The K85 and X68 HE are the Attack Shark picks for pure speed; the F75 and F99 are the AULA picks for versatility.
Both brands push budget keyboard value hard. The right choice depends on wired gaming speed versus wireless versatility. Neither brand dominates the other; they target different priorities.
Compare Side by Side
| ATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85 | AULA F75 | ATTACK SHARK X68 HE | AULA F99 | ATTACK SHARK K86 | AULA F87 | AULA F98 |
68 Overall/ Value 68.2Build Quality 63.0Customizability 66.9Performance 46.1Productivity 83.1Portability 63.2 | -28% off 89 Overall/ Value 88.5Build Quality 76.1Customizability 82.4Performance 77.2Productivity 91.7Portability 81.6 | 70 Overall/ Value 69.6Build Quality 63.8Customizability 67.3Performance 92.4Productivity 66.3Portability 74.1 | 75 Overall/ Value 75.3Build Quality 63.2Customizability 72.8Performance 59.6Productivity 89.2Portability 64.3 | 77 Overall/ Value 77.4Build Quality 76.0Customizability 75.6Performance 67.9Productivity 85.3Portability 82.1 | 62 Overall/ Value 62.2Build Quality 59.7Customizability 48.4Performance 57.6Productivity 75.8Portability 73.3 | 66 Overall/ Value 66.3Build Quality 59.8Customizability 58.9Performance 74.1Productivity 76.0Portability 53.6 |
0.0 stars (0 reviews) | 4.6 stars (1800 reviews) | 0.0 stars (0 reviews) | 4.8 stars (21 reviews) | 0.0 stars (0 reviews) | 5.0 stars (1 reviews) | 0.0 stars (0 reviews) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scores
| Scores
| Scores
| Scores
| Scores
| Scores
| Scores
|
Name ATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85 | Name AULA F75 | Name ATTACK SHARK X68 HE | Name AULA F99 | Name ATTACK SHARK K86 | Name AULA F87 | Name AULA F98 |
Release year 2024 | Release year 2023 | Release year 2025 | Release year 2023 | Release year 2024 | Release year 2025 | Release year 2025 |
Switch Options Magnetic | Switch Options Silent, Linear | Switch Options Linear, Clicky, Magnetic | Switch Options Linear | Switch Options Linear | Switch Options Linear | Switch Options Linear |
Profile Normal Profile | Profile Normal Profile | Profile Normal Profile | Profile Normal Profile | Profile Normal Profile | Profile Normal Profile | Profile Normal Profile |
Hot Swappable | Hot Swappable | Hot Swappable | Hot Swappable | Hot Swappable | Hot Swappable | Hot Swappable |
Layout Size 75% | Layout Size 75% | Layout Size 65% | Layout Size 96% | Layout Size 75% | Layout Size 80% | Layout Size 98% |
Layout Standard ANSI | Layout Standard ANSI | Layout Standard ANSI | Layout Standard ANSI | Layout Standard ANSI | Layout Standard ANSI | Layout Standard ANSI |
Layout Ergonomics Normal | Layout Ergonomics Normal | Layout Ergonomics Normal | Layout Ergonomics Normal | Layout Ergonomics Normal | Layout Ergonomics Normal | Layout Ergonomics Normal |
Knob Support | Knob Support | Knob Support | Knob Support | Knob Support | Knob Support | Knob Support |
Display Support | Display Support | Display Support | Display Support | Display Support TFT | Display Support | Display Support |
Mac/Win Support | Mac/Win Support | Mac/Win Support | Mac/Win Support | Mac/Win Support | Mac/Win Support | Mac/Win Support |
Multi-Media Keys | Multi-Media Keys | Multi-Media Keys | Multi-Media Keys | Multi-Media Keys | Multi-Media Keys | Multi-Media Keys |
USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C |
USB passthrough | USB passthrough | USB passthrough | USB passthrough | USB passthrough | USB passthrough | USB passthrough |
Connection Wired, Wired only | Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless | Connection Wired, Wired only | Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless | Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless | Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless | Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless |
Polling Rate - | Polling Rate 1000 Hz | Polling Rate 8000 Hz | Polling Rate - | Polling Rate - | Polling Rate 1000 Hz | Polling Rate 1000 Hz |
Battery capacity - | Battery capacity 4000 mAh | Battery capacity - | Battery capacity 8000 mAh | Battery capacity 4000 mAh | Battery capacity 4000 mAh | Battery capacity 4000 mAh |
Hall Effect Support | Hall Effect Support | Hall Effect Support | Hall Effect Support | Hall Effect Support | Hall Effect Support | Hall Effect Support |
QMK Support | QMK Support | QMK Support | QMK Support | QMK Support | QMK Support | QMK Support |
VIA Support | VIA Support | VIA Support | VIA Support | VIA Support | VIA Support | VIA Support |
VIAL Support | VIAL Support | VIAL Support | VIAL Support | VIAL Support | VIAL Support | VIAL Support |
N-Key Rollover | N-Key Rollover | N-Key Rollover | N-Key Rollover | N-Key Rollover | N-Key Rollover | N-Key Rollover |
Rapid Trigger | Rapid Trigger | Rapid Trigger | Rapid Trigger | Rapid Trigger | Rapid Trigger | Rapid Trigger |
Mount Style Gasket Mount | Mount Style Gasket Mount | Mount Style - | Mount Style Gasket Mount | Mount Style Gasket Mount | Mount Style Gasket Mount | Mount Style Gasket Mount |
Screw in Stabilizers | Screw in Stabilizers | Screw in Stabilizers | Screw in Stabilizers | Screw in Stabilizers | Screw in Stabilizers | Screw in Stabilizers |
Sound Dampening | Sound Dampening | Sound Dampening | Sound Dampening | Sound Dampening | Sound Dampening | Sound Dampening |
Backlight | Backlight Rgb, North-face | Backlight Rgb, South-face | Backlight Rgb, North-face | Backlight Rgb | Backlight | Backlight Rgb |
Case Colors | Case Colors | Case Colors | Case Colors | Case Colors | Case Colors | Case Colors |
Case Material Aluminum | Case Material Plastic, Aluminum | Case Material Aluminum | Case Material ABS, Plastic, PBT | Case Material Aluminum | Case Material ABS | Case Material Plastic |
Keycaps Material PBT | Keycaps Material PBT | Keycaps Material PBT | Keycaps Material PBT | Keycaps Material PBT | Keycaps Material PBT | Keycaps Material PBT, ABS |
Dimensions 40 x 136 x 327 mm | Dimensions 43 x 143 x 323 mm | Dimensions 60 x 150 x 350 mm | Dimensions 43 x 147 x 391 mm | Dimensions 35 x 380 x 150 mm | Dimensions 41 x 139 x 365 mm | Dimensions 41 x 138 x 385 mm |
Weight 780g | Weight 1023g | Weight 950g | Weight 1023g | Weight 930g | Weight 1020g | Weight 1040g |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Read more
Keychron vs Wooting: Do You Need Wireless Flexibility or Hall Effect Speed?
AULA vs Keychron: Can Budget Gasket Mounts Keep Up with Premium QMK Boards?
