Compare Ajazz ALUX68 vs ATTACK SHARK X68 HE Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between two similarly priced, high-performance 65% gaming keyboards. Both the Ajazz ALUX68 and ATTACK SHARK X68 HE feature aluminum cases, 8000Hz polling rates, and Hall effect magnetic switches. The decision is difficult because they share core specs but diverge on key practical features like switch customization and keycap quality, making the choice dependent on your willingness to modify the keyboard later.

Model
		70	Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	0.0 stars (0 reviews)	0.0 stars (0 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Has Linear, Magnetic switch options Weighs about 1100 g Sized at 20 x 319 x 112 mm Offers Yes, Rgb RGB lighting	Has Linear, Clicky, Magnetic switch options Supports hot-swappable switches Weighs about 950 g Sized at 60 x 150 x 350 mm Features PBT keycaps Offers Yes, Rgb, South-face, Rgb South-face RGB lighting
Score	Scores Performance: 91.3 Build Quality: 52.8 Productivity: 54 Customizability: 49.3 Portability: 67.8	Scores Performance: 92.4 Build Quality: 63.5 Productivity: 66.6 Customizability: 67.5 Portability: 74.5
Name	Name Ajazz ALUX68	Name ATTACK SHARK X68 HE
Release year	Release year 2025	Release year 2025
Switch Options	Switch Options Linear, Magnetic	Switch Options Linear, Clicky, Magnetic
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 65%	Layout Size 65%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support	Display Support
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Wired, Wired only	Connection Wired, Wired only
Polling Rate	Polling Rate 8000 Hz	Polling Rate 8000 Hz
Battery capacity	Battery capacity -	Battery capacity -
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style -	Mount Style -
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight Rgb	Backlight Rgb, South-face
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material Aluminum	Case Material Aluminum
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material -	Keycaps Material PBT
Dimensions	Dimensions 20 x 319 x 112 mm	Dimensions 60 x 150 x 350 mm
Weight	Weight 1100g	Weight 950g

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

The ATTACK SHARK X68 HE is the more versatile and forward-looking choice for most users, thanks to its hot-swap capability and higher-quality PBT keycaps. Opt for the Ajazz ALUX68 if you specifically want one of its pre-selected magnetic switch varieties and do not plan on modifying the keyboard. Both deliver top-tier wired gaming performance.

Ajazz ALUX68

+Offers a choice of specific magnetic switch models (Ajazz Grain, TTC Aquarius, Ajazz Kotec).
+Vendor description highlights a PC/Web dual driver for button customization.
+Features an aluminum alloy plate and case construction.

−Lacks hot-swappable sockets, limiting future switch changes.
−Keycap material is not specified, which may indicate less durable ABS plastic.
−Heavier at 1100g compared to the alternative.

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE

+Hot-swappable PCB allows for easy switch replacement without soldering.
+Includes PBT double-shot keycaps for better durability and texture.
+Lighter weight of 950g and explicitly lists south-facing RGB LEDs.
+Vendor description lists advanced gaming features like Rapid Trigger (RT) and Snap Tap.

−Only one magnetic switch option (OUTEMU White Jade) is listed in the available description.
−No wireless connectivity, limiting placement options.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The ATTACK SHARK X68 HE holds a clear advantage for modders and typists due to its hot-swap sockets and PBT keycaps, making it the better choice for office work and programming. For pure gaming, the keyboards are evenly matched on paper with identical high-end latency specs. Travelers might slightly prefer the ATTACK SHARK's lower weight, though both are wired-only. Content creators will find similar RGB and layout benefits in either model.

GamingTie

•Both offer an 8000Hz polling rate and 0.125ms latency for competitive play.
•Both feature Hall effect magnetic switches with adjustable actuation points.
•The ATTACK SHARK lists specific gaming features like Rapid Trigger and Snap Tap.

OfficeATTACK SHARK X68 HE

•The ATTACK SHARK includes PBT double-shot keycaps, which are more durable against shine from frequent typing.
•Its lighter weight of 950g may be slightly easier to reposition on a desk.
•Both are 65% layouts, saving desk space, and support Windows and Mac.

ProgrammingATTACK SHARK X68 HE

•The ATTACK SHARK's hot-swappable PCB allows for easy switch changes to suit typing preferences.
•PBT keycaps offer better long-term texture for extended typing sessions.
•The 65% layout is compact but requires use of function layers for navigation keys.

TravelATTACK SHARK X68 HE

•The ATTACK SHARK is lighter at 950g compared to the Ajazz's 1100g.
•Both share a portable 65% form factor and require only a USB-C cable.
•Neither offers wireless connectivity, limiting true portability.

ModdingATTACK SHARK X68 HE

•The ATTACK SHARK explicitly has a hot-swappable PCB for easy switch changes.
•Its south-facing RGB LEDs are listed as compatible with Cherry-profile keycaps.
•The Ajazz ALUX68 is listed as a pre-built unit with no mention of hot-swap capability.

Content CreationTie

•Both offer full RGB backlighting for aesthetic setups.
•The compact 65% layout frees up desk space for graphics tablets or other peripherals.
•Neither keyboard mentions dedicated media keys, which may require using function layers.