Compare ATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85 vs AULA WIN68 Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between two wired, magnetic switch keyboards at different price points. The AttackShark K85 offers an aluminum case and a 75% layout with a knob, while the AULA WIN68 focuses on a high 8KHz polling rate in a smaller 65% form factor. The decision hinges on whether you prioritize build materials and media controls or raw gaming performance and compactness.

Model
	68		Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	0.0 stars (0 reviews)	0.0 stars (0 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Has Magnetic switch options Supports hot-swappable switches Available in a 75% layout Comes with a knob Provides dedicated media keys Includes screw-in stabilizers Uses a Gasket Mount mounting style Weighs about 780 g Sized at 40 x 136 x 327 mm Made with a Aluminum case Features PBT keycaps Offers No RGB lighting	Has Linear, Magnetic switch options Available in a 65% layout Has built-in sound dampening Runs at a 8000 Hz polling rate Weighs about 690 g Sized at 37 x 109 x 321 mm Made with a Plastic case Offers Yes, Rgb RGB lighting
Score	Scores Performance: 46.1 Build Quality: 63.3 Productivity: 83.3 Customizability: 67.2 Portability: 62.9	Scores Performance: 84.8 Build Quality: 47 Productivity: 72.4 Customizability: 53 Portability: 71.4
Name	Name ATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85	Name AULA WIN68
Release year	Release year 2024	Release year 2024
Switch Options	Switch Options Magnetic	Switch Options Linear, Magnetic
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 75%	Layout Size 65%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support	Display Support
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Wired, Wired only	Connection Wired, Wired only
Polling Rate	Polling Rate -	Polling Rate 8000 Hz
Battery capacity	Battery capacity -	Battery capacity -
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style Gasket Mount	Mount Style -
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight	Backlight Rgb
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material Aluminum	Case Material Plastic
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material PBT	Keycaps Material -
Dimensions	Dimensions 40 x 136 x 327 mm	Dimensions 37 x 109 x 321 mm
Weight	Weight 780g	Weight 690g

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

Your primary need dictates the choice. If your budget is tighter and you want the highest possible polling rate for competitive gaming in a minimal footprint, the AULA WIN68 is compelling. If you can spend more for a sturdier aluminum build, a more practical 75% layout with a volume knob, and better modding foundations like hot-swap and screw-in stabilizers, the AttackShark K85 is the more versatile keyboard.

ATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85

+Aluminum alloy case construction for a premium feel.
+75% layout includes arrow keys and some navigation keys.
+Includes a metallic volume knob for multimedia control.
+Features screw-in stabilizers and a gasket mount.
+Uses PBT material keycaps for durability.

−More expensive than the AULA WIN68.
−Heavier at 780 grams.
−Lacks RGB backlighting.

AULA WIN68

+Lower price point.
+Specifies an 8000 Hz polling rate for gaming.
+More compact 65% layout and lighter weight (690g).
+Includes RGB backlighting with single-key customization.
+Comes with PO sandwich and bottom cotton for sound dampening.

−Plastic case construction.
−65% layout lacks dedicated function and navigation keys.
−No mention of hot-swappable sockets or a volume knob.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The AULA WIN68 takes the lead for dedicated gaming and travel due to its high polling rate and compact size. The AttackShark K85 is the stronger choice for office work, programming, modding, and content creation, thanks to its more functional layout, build quality, and included media knob. For most productivity-focused tasks, the K85's advantages in layout and features are decisive.

GamingAULA WIN68

•The AULA WIN68 has a specified 8000 Hz polling rate for faster data reporting.
•Its vendor description highlights an adjustable feature with 0 dead zone for customizable control.
•It is lighter at 690g, which may be preferable for quick desk movements.

OfficeATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85

•The AttackShark K85 has a 75% layout with dedicated function and navigation keys.
•It includes a metallic volume knob for easy multimedia control.
•Its aluminum case may offer a more professional aesthetic.

ProgrammingATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85

•The AttackShark K85's 75% layout retains arrow keys and some navigation cluster keys.
•Its full-key hot-swappable sockets allow for easy switch customization.
•The PBT keycaps are wear-resistant for long-term use.

TravelAULA WIN68

•The AULA WIN68 is more compact with a 65% layout (321 x 109 mm vs 327 x 136 mm).
•It is lighter, weighing 690g compared to 780g.
•Its smaller footprint is easier to fit in a bag.

ModdingATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85

•The AttackShark K85 is confirmed to have hot-swappable sockets.
•It features screw-in stabilizers, which are typically preferred for modding.
•The gasket mount style and aluminum case provide a solid foundation for modifications.

Content CreationATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85

•The AttackShark K85's dedicated volume knob offers tactile control for audio/video editing.
•Its 75% layout provides more immediate key access than a 65% board.
•The aluminum build may contribute to a sturdier, less resonant typing experience.