Compare ATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85 vs Irok ND75 Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between two similarly priced 75% aluminum magnetic switch keyboards. The choice is difficult because both offer hall effect switches, gasket mounts, and hot-swappable sockets. The decision hinges on whether you prioritize the Irok ND75's explicitly stated high-performance gaming specs or the AttackShark K85's practical multimedia controls and availability.

Model
	68	68	Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	0.0 stars (0 reviews)	0.0 stars (0 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Has Magnetic switch options Comes with a knob Provides dedicated media keys Includes screw-in stabilizers Weighs about 780 g Sized at 40 x 136 x 327 mm Offers No RGB lighting	Has Linear, Magnetic switch options Enables rapid trigger functionality Has built-in sound dampening Runs at a 8000 Hz polling rate Weighs about 750 g Sized at 18 x 150 x 330 mm Offers Yes, Rgb RGB lighting
Score	Scores Performance: 46.1 Build Quality: 63.3 Productivity: 83.3 Customizability: 67.2 Portability: 63	Scores Performance: 89.3 Build Quality: 58.9 Productivity: 78.1 Customizability: 63.1 Portability: 65.3
Name	Name ATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85	Name Irok ND75
Release year	Release year 2024	Release year 2024
Switch Options	Switch Options Magnetic	Switch Options Linear, Magnetic
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 75%	Layout Size 75%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support	Display Support
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Wired, Wired only	Connection Wired, Wired only
Polling Rate	Polling Rate -	Polling Rate 8000 Hz
Battery capacity	Battery capacity -	Battery capacity -
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style Gasket Mount	Mount Style Gasket Mount
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight	Backlight Rgb
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material Aluminum	Case Material Aluminum
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material PBT	Keycaps Material PBT
Dimensions	Dimensions 40 x 136 x 327 mm	Dimensions 18 x 150 x 330 mm
Weight	Weight 780g	Weight 750g

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

Your primary use case dictates the choice. If competitive gaming performance is your top priority and you can find it in stock, the Irok ND75's 8000Hz polling and rapid trigger are compelling. For a more versatile daily driver with excellent media controls, the readily available AttackShark K85 is the better option. Both are solid foundations for customization.

ATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85

+Includes a dedicated aluminum alloy volume knob for media control.
+Vendor description lists 'Multi-Media Keys' as a specific feature.
+Currently listed as in stock from at least one vendor.
+Features screw-in stabilizers, which can offer more stability than clip-in types.

−Lacks RGB backlighting.
−No explicit high polling rate or rapid trigger feature is mentioned for gaming.
−Slightly heavier at 780 grams.

Irok ND75

+Explicitly lists an 8000Hz polling rate for faster response.
+Includes 'Rapid Trigger' as a listed feature for gaming.
+Has per-key RGB backlighting with 16.8 million colors.
+Features a three-layered sound absorbing internal structure with silicone padding.

−Currently listed as out of stock from the provided vendor.
−No dedicated multimedia knob is mentioned.
−Slightly wider footprint at 150mm.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The Irok ND75 is the clear choice for gaming due to its high polling rate and rapid trigger feature. For office work and content creation, the AttackShark K85 takes the lead with its practical multimedia knob. For programming, travel, and modding, the keyboards are evenly matched, sharing core features like their layout, hot-swap capability, and build materials.

GamingIrok ND75

•The Irok ND75 lists an 8000Hz polling rate, which is higher than standard keyboards.
•Its feature list includes 'Rapid Trigger', a function beneficial for gaming.
•The vendor description claims an 'ultra-fast response time' and 'lightning-fast trigger response'.

OfficeATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85

•The AttackShark K85 includes an aluminum alloy volume knob for quick media control.
•Its vendor description lists 'Multi-Media Keys' as a feature.
•The keyboard's listed dimensions suggest a slightly narrower footprint (136mm vs 150mm).

ProgrammingTie

•Both use a 75% ANSI layout with arrow keys, a compact but functional form factor.
•Both have hot-swappable sockets for customizing switch feel.
•Both are compatible with Mac and Windows systems.

TravelTie

•Both keyboards have similar weights (780g vs 750g) and are wired-only, limiting true portability.
•Both share a compact 75% form factor.
•Neither offers a wireless connectivity option.

ModdingTie

•Both keyboards feature full-key hot-swappable sockets for easy switch changes.
•Both use gasket mount designs, which are popular for modding sound and feel.
•Both come with PBT keycaps and aluminum cases as a starting base.

Content CreationATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85

•The AttackShark K85's dedicated volume knob provides tactile control for audio editing and media playback.
•Its vendor description specifically highlights the knob for 'multimedia volume' control.
•The inclusion of multi-media keys can streamline workflow shortcuts.