Compare ATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85 vs Redragon M68 Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between two wired, Hall effect mechanical keyboards at a similar price point. The choice hinges on whether you prioritize a more complete 75% layout with a volume knob and gasket-mounted feel, or an ultra-compact 65% form factor with a higher specified polling rate for competitive gaming. Both offer adjustable magnetic switches and PBT keycaps, making the core typing experience a shared strength.

Model
	68		Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	0.0 stars (0 reviews)	0.0 stars (0 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Has Magnetic switch options Available in a 75% layout Comes with a knob Compatible with both Mac and Windows Provides dedicated media keys Includes screw-in stabilizers Uses a Gasket Mount mounting style Weighs about 780 g Sized at 40 x 136 x 327 mm Made with a Aluminum case Offers No RGB lighting	Has Linear, Magnetic switch options Available in a 65% layout Has built-in sound dampening Runs at a 8000 Hz polling rate Weighs about 550 g Sized at 36 x 101 x 310 mm Made with a Metal case Offers Yes, Rgb RGB lighting
Score	Scores Performance: 46.1 Build Quality: 63.3 Productivity: 83.3 Customizability: 67.2 Portability: 63	Scores Performance: 75.3 Build Quality: 40.6 Productivity: 56.6 Customizability: 53.8 Portability: 67.4
Name	Name ATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85	Name Redragon M68
Release year	Release year 2024	Release year 2024
Switch Options	Switch Options Magnetic	Switch Options Linear, Magnetic
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 75%	Layout Size 65%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support	Display Support
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Wired, Wired only	Connection Wired, Wired only
Polling Rate	Polling Rate -	Polling Rate 8000 Hz
Battery capacity	Battery capacity -	Battery capacity -
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style Gasket Mount	Mount Style -
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight	Backlight Rgb
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material Aluminum	Case Material Metal
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material PBT	Keycaps Material PBT
Dimensions	Dimensions 40 x 136 x 327 mm	Dimensions 36 x 101 x 310 mm
Weight	Weight 780g	Weight 550g

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

Your primary need dictates the choice. If you want a more traditional, feature-rich typing experience with a knob and gasket-mounted feel, the AttackShark K85 is the clear pick. If your priority is a minimalist, high-performance gaming setup where every millisecond and square inch of desk space counts, the Redragon M68 with its 8000Hz rate and compact form is the better tool.

ATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85

+75% layout includes dedicated function and navigation keys for better productivity.
+Aluminum alloy case and gasket mount construction for a premium typing feel.
+Includes a dedicated aluminum volume knob for media control.
+Features screw-in stabilizers, which are preferred for modding.
+Larger form factor may provide a more stable typing platform.

−Larger and heavier (780g, 327x136x40mm) than the M68, less portable.
−No RGB backlighting is listed.
−Polling rate is not explicitly stated in the provided specifications.

Redragon M68

+Ultra-compact 65% layout (310x101x36mm) saves considerable desk space.
+Specifies an 8000Hz polling rate for high-speed input.
+Includes sound-dampening internal filling to reduce typing noise.
+Lighter weight (550g) enhances portability.
+Features 16.8 million color RGB backlighting.

−65% layout lacks dedicated function and navigation keys, requiring more use of layers.
−No physical volume knob or multi-media keys are mentioned.
−Mount style is not specified, potentially indicating a simpler tray mount.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The AttackShark K85 is the stronger choice for office work, programming, and modding due to its more complete layout, included knob, and gasket mount construction. The Redragon M68 wins for gaming and travel, leveraging its high polling rate, sound dampening, and ultra-compact, lightweight design. For content creation, the adjustable switches on both make them equally viable, with the decision coming down to layout preference.

GamingRedragon M68

•The Redragon M68 lists an 8000Hz polling rate for potentially lower latency.
•Its lighter 550g weight and smaller 65% footprint free up more desk space for mouse movement.
•It includes sound-dampening internal filling, which can reduce distracting noise.

OfficeATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85

•The AttackShark K85's 75% layout retains dedicated function and navigation keys for easier workflow.
•It includes a dedicated aluminum alloy volume knob for convenient media control.
•The manufacturer lists multi-media keys as a feature.

ProgrammingATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85

•The 75% layout on the K85 provides arrow keys and some function keys without layers, which can speed up navigation.
•The inclusion of screw-in stabilizers, as noted in its features, may offer a more consistent feel on larger keys.
•Its larger form factor may be more comfortable for long typing sessions.

TravelRedragon M68

•The Redragon M68 is significantly smaller (310x101x36mm vs 327x136x40mm).
•It is also lighter at 550g compared to the K85's 780g.
•Its 65% layout is more space-efficient for a packed bag.

ModdingATTACK SHARK AttackShark K85

•The AttackShark K85 uses a gasket mount style, which is often preferred for its typing feel.
•It features screw-in stabilizers, which are generally easier to tune and modify than clip-in variants.
•The product listing mentions knob support, indicating potential for customization.

Content CreationTie

•Both keyboards feature Hall effect switches with adjustable actuation (0.2-3.8mm on K85, 0.2-4.0mm on M68) for personalized input.
•Both have full-key hot-swappable sockets for easy switch changes.
•The K85 offers a knob for timeline scrubbing, while the M68's compact size can be an advantage for small setups.