Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head ยท Prices checked Nov 7, 2026

ATTACK SHARK K86 vs AULA AU75Aluminum Build vs Sound Dampening

Choose the Attack Shark K86 for its premium aluminum build and TFT screen, or the AULA AU75 for its deeper sound dampening and potentially better performance feel.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

ATTACK SHARK K86

Aluminum Build

Build quality in the top 20% of 75% boards under $100.

If you want

  • Aluminum case construction for a premium, sturdy feel.
  • Integrated TFT color display for status info and custom GIFs.
  • Features side RGB lighting in addition to per-key RGB.

Get the

AULA AU75

Sound Dampening

Build quality in the bottom 50% of 75% boards under $100.

If you want

  • Features five layers of sound-dampening material including PET acoustic membrane and silicone pads.
  • Product listing explicitly states N-key rollover for anti-ghosting.
  • Includes a functional knob for switching between office and gaming modes.

Bottom line

Your choice hinges on material preference versus acoustic engineering. Select the Attack Shark K86 if you prioritize a metal build, visual customization via the TFT screen, and a slightly lighter weight. Opt for the AULA AU75 if your focus is on achieving a specific, well-damped sound signature with extensive foam layers and you value the explicitly stated N-key rollover for gaming. Both are competent tri-mode keyboards at a similar price point.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

ATTACK SHARK K86

AULA AU75

  • Case material

    Aluminum

    ABS

  • Display

    TFT

    None

    A case display rather than a typing feature

  • Weight

    930 g

    980 g

    Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel

  • N-key rollover

    No

    Yes

  • Dimensions

    35 x 380 x 150 mm

    44 x 147 x 336 mm

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • ATTACK SHARK K86
  • AULA AU75
Performance
68
80
Build quality
76
65
Productivity
85
85
Customizability
75
70
Portability
81
81

What they share

  • Layout size: 75%
  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • Battery: 4,000 mAh
  • Switch options: Linear
  • Mount style: Gasket Mount
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The AULA AU75 has a slight edge for gaming due to its specified N-key rollover and deep sound dampening. The Attack Shark K86 wins for programming and content creation, leveraging its unique TFT screen and aluminum build. For office use, travel, and modding, the keyboards are closely matched, making the choice dependent on whether you value the K86's screen and metal build or the AU75's acoustic focus.

For gaming

Pick the AULA AU75

  • The AULA AU75 listing explicitly mentions N-key rollover for anti-ghosting, a feature not highlighted for the K86.
  • Its five-layer sound dampening (sandwich foam, IXPE, PET, bottom foam, silicone) may provide a more solid, less pingy feel during rapid key presses.
  • The manufacturer describes a functional knob for switching between office and gaming modes.

Full specs

ATTACK SHARK K86 vs AULA AU75 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

5 of 20 specs differ

ATTACK SHARK K86

AULA AU75

Typing & switches

Switch options

Linear
Linear

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
Gasket Mount

Sound dampening

Yes
Yes

Layout

Layout size

75%
75%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Knob

Yes
Yes

Display

TFT
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Battery

4,000 mAh
4,000 mAh

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum
ABS

Keycaps

PBT
PBT

Weight

930 g
980 g

Dimensions

35 x 380 x 150 mm
44 x 147 x 336 mm

Backlight

RGB
RGB

Firmware & software

N-key rollover

No
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
Yes

Extras

Released

2024
2024

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

AULA AU752 stores

FAQ

ATTACK SHARK K86 vs AULA AU75: your questions

The AULA AU75 is described as having five specific layers of sound-deadening material: sandwich foam, IXPE switch pads, a PET acoustic membrane, bottom foam, and silicone protector pads. The Attack Shark K86 lists triple sound absorbing foam including EVA PCB foam, bottom foam, and an IXPE switch pad. Based on vendor descriptions, the AU75 likely has more comprehensive dampening.

Yes, the Attack Shark K86 features a smart TFT color display. According to the manufacturer, it can show keyboard status, connection mode, battery level, date, time, and supports custom GIF images.

The AULA AU75 listing highlights features beneficial for gaming, including N-key rollover for anti-ghosting and a knob that can switch the keyboard into a dedicated gaming mode. Its sound-dampening may also reduce distracting ping during gameplay.

The Attack Shark K86 comes with custom Blue Whale linear switches. The AULA AU75 comes with Leobog Star Vector linear switches. Both are hot-swappable, allowing you to change them easily.

Yes, both the Attack Shark K86 and AULA AU75 offer tri-mode connectivity. This includes Bluetooth, 2.4GHz wireless via a USB receiver, and a wired USB-C connection.

Both keyboards have a 4000mAh rechargeable battery, as stated in their specifications. This should provide comparable battery life for wireless use.

Both are highly customizable with hot-swappable switches and RGB lighting. The Attack Shark K86 adds a layer of visual customization with its programmable TFT screen and side RGB lights. The AULA AU75 offers a functional knob for mode switching.

Both the Attack Shark K86 and AULA AU75 use PBT keycaps. The K86's listing specifies they are double-shot PBT, which typically offers better durability and legend longevity.

The primary material difference is the case. The Attack Shark K86 has an aluminum case, while the AULA AU75 uses an ABS plastic case. Aluminum generally offers a more premium feel and greater rigidity.

Yes, both the Attack Shark K86 and AULA AU75 list Mac and Windows support in their extra features. The K86's TFT screen also specifically shows a compatibility indicator.

The AULA AU75 is slightly heavier, weighing 980g compared to the Attack Shark K86's 930g. The difference is minimal but may be noticeable when moving the keyboard.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.