Compare ATTACK SHARK K86 vs AULA AU75 Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between two similarly priced, feature-rich 75% wireless mechanical keyboards. The decision is difficult because both offer tri-mode connectivity, hot-swappable sockets, gasket mounts, and 4000mAh batteries. The core trade-off lies in the Attack Shark K86's aluminum construction and TFT display versus the AULA AU75's more extensive sound-dampening foam layers and ABS case. Your priority between material quality and acoustic tuning will guide the choice.

Model
	77	73	Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	0.0 stars (0 reviews)	0.0 stars (0 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Includes a Yes, TFT display Weighs about 930 g Sized at 35 x 380 x 150 mm Made with a Aluminum case	Includes a No display Features N-key rollover Weighs about 980 g Sized at 44 x 147 x 336 mm Made with a ABS case
Score	Scores Performance: 66.7 Build Quality: 76 Productivity: 84.6 Customizability: 74.7 Portability: 81.1	Scores Performance: 79.9 Build Quality: 65.5 Productivity: 85.5 Customizability: 70.7 Portability: 82.1
Name	Name ATTACK SHARK K86	Name AULA AU75
Release year	Release year 2024	Release year 2024
Switch Options	Switch Options Linear	Switch Options Linear
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 75%	Layout Size 75%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support TFT	Display Support
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless	Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless
Polling Rate	Polling Rate -	Polling Rate -
Battery capacity	Battery capacity 4000 mAh	Battery capacity 4000 mAh
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style Gasket Mount	Mount Style Gasket Mount
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight Rgb	Backlight Rgb
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material Aluminum	Case Material ABS
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material PBT	Keycaps Material PBT
Dimensions	Dimensions 35 x 380 x 150 mm	Dimensions 44 x 147 x 336 mm
Weight	Weight 930g	Weight 980g

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

Your choice hinges on material preference versus acoustic engineering. Select the Attack Shark K86 if you prioritize a metal build, visual customization via the TFT screen, and a slightly lighter weight. Opt for the AULA AU75 if your focus is on achieving a specific, well-damped sound signature with extensive foam layers and you value the explicitly stated N-key rollover for gaming. Both are competent tri-mode keyboards at a similar price point.

ATTACK SHARK K86

+Aluminum case construction for a premium, sturdy feel.
+Integrated TFT color display for status info and custom GIFs.
+Features side RGB lighting in addition to per-key RGB.
+Uses TTC E-Sport hot-swap sockets claimed to have high durability.
+Includes triple sound absorbing foam (EVA PCB, bottom, IXPE switch pad).

−Lacks the explicit mention of N-key rollover found in the AU75 listing.
−The vendor description does not detail as many layers of sound dampening as the AU75.
−Potential for higher cost relative to the ABS-built alternative.

AULA AU75

+Features five layers of sound-dampening material including PET acoustic membrane and silicone pads.
+Product listing explicitly states N-key rollover for anti-ghosting.
+Includes a functional knob for switching between office and gaming modes.
+Uses Leobog Star Vector linear switches.
+Customer reviews on the vendor page praise its sound and typing feel.

−ABS case material may feel less premium than aluminum.
−No integrated screen for status information or customization.
−Slightly heavier at 980g.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The AULA AU75 has a slight edge for gaming due to its specified N-key rollover and deep sound dampening. The Attack Shark K86 wins for programming and content creation, leveraging its unique TFT screen and aluminum build. For office use, travel, and modding, the keyboards are closely matched, making the choice dependent on whether you value the K86's screen and metal build or the AU75's acoustic focus.

GamingAULA AU75

•The AULA AU75 listing explicitly mentions N-key rollover for anti-ghosting, a feature not highlighted for the K86.
•Its five-layer sound dampening (sandwich foam, IXPE, PET, bottom foam, silicone) may provide a more solid, less pingy feel during rapid key presses.
•The manufacturer describes a functional knob for switching between office and gaming modes.

OfficeTie

•Both offer tri-mode wireless (Bluetooth, 2.4GHz, USB-C) for connecting to multiple devices.
•Both have a 75% layout that saves desk space while retaining essential keys.
•Both include a knob for convenient volume and media control.

ProgrammingATTACK SHARK K86

•The Attack Shark K86's TFT screen can display system info like date, time, and battery level, useful for monitoring during long sessions.
•Its aluminum case may offer a more stable and premium typing platform.
•The vendor page mentions driver software for key customization, which could be beneficial for macros.

TravelATTACK SHARK K86

•The Attack Shark K86 is slightly lighter at 930g compared to the AU75's 980g.
•Its aluminum case, while premium, may offer better durability against travel knocks than the AU75's ABS case.
•Both share the same compact 75% footprint and wireless capabilities.

ModdingTie

•Both keyboards are hot-swappable, supporting 3-pin and 5-pin switches.
•Both use a gasket mount design, which is favored for its typing feel.
•Both come pre-lubed with sound-dampening foam, though the types and layers differ.

Content CreationATTACK SHARK K86

•The K86's TFT screen supports custom GIFs, which can be used for branding or visual feedback.
•Its side RGB lighting offers more ambient lighting options for a setup.
•The aluminum build contributes to a more visually premium aesthetic on camera.