ATTACK SHARK K86 vs AULA F75 MaxAluminum or ABS
Choose the K86 for its aluminum case, or the F75 Max for its specified 1000Hz wired and 2.4GHz polling and more detailed switch and dampening features.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
No reviews
from$67at WhatGeek
4.8 (52)4.8 · 52 reviews
from$70at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
ATTACK SHARK K86
Build quality in the top 20% of 75% boards under $100.
- Aluminum case, compared with the F75 Max's ABS case.
- 75% ANSI layout with a linear switch type, gasket mount, and PBT keycaps.
- Bluetooth, 2.4GHz, and wired connectivity with a 4000mAh battery.
Get the
AULA F75 Max
Screw-in stabilizers
Build quality in the top 25% of 75% boards under $100.
- 1000Hz polling on wired and 2.4GHz connections, plus N-Key Rollover.
- Hot-swappable 3- and 5-pin switches, with screw-in stabilizers also mentioned for replacement.
- Vendor details include a flex-cut PC plate and foam, silicone, IXPE, and PET dampening layers.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Pick the ATTACK SHARK K86 if an aluminum case is your priority and you want a slightly lighter board. Choose the AULA F75 Max if you want stated 1000Hz wired and 2.4GHz polling, N-Key Rollover, or its listed screw-in stabilizer and dampening details. Both retain the core 75% layout, tri-mode connectivity, TFT screen, knob, and hot-swap capability.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
ATTACK SHARK K86
AULA F75 Max
Case material
Aluminum
ABS
Weight
930 g
960 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
Screw-in stabilizers
No
Yes
Easier to tune than the plate-mount stabs you get prebuilt
Backlight
RGB
RGB, south-facing
RGB for looks and low light rather than speed
N-key rollover
No
Yes
- ATTACK SHARK K86
- AULA F75 Max
- Performance
- 6878
- Build quality
- 7676
- Productivity
- 8591
- Customizability
- 7578
- Portability
- 8179
- Layout size: 75%
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Battery: 4,000 mAh
- Switch options: Linear
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
What will you mostly use it for?
The F75 Max has the clearer edge for gaming and hands-on switch or stabilizer changes, thanks to its stated polling rate, N-Key Rollover, and more detailed hot-swap options. Office and content-creation needs are close because both boards combine a compact layout with a TFT screen, knob, and tri-mode connections. The K86 is marginally lighter, while its aluminum case is the strongest reason to choose it over the F75 Max's ABS case.
Pick the AULA F75 Max
- The F75 Max lists 1000Hz polling on wired and 2.4GHz connections.
- It includes N-Key Rollover, described as anti-ghosting.
- The K86 vendor description lists linear switches but no polling-rate figure.
ATTACK SHARK K86 vs AULA F75 Max specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
6 of 23 specs differ
ATTACK SHARK K86
AULA F75 Max
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
ATTACK SHARK K86 vs AULA F75 Max: your questions
The F75 Max has the clearer listed gaming features: 1000Hz polling on wired and 2.4GHz connections and N-Key Rollover. The K86 vendor description calls its linear switches responsive, but does not give a polling-rate figure.
The K86 has an aluminum case, while the F75 Max has an ABS case. The F75 Max also lists 1000Hz polling on wired and 2.4GHz connections, plus more detailed switch and dampening specifications.
Both are 75% ANSI keyboards. The K86 vendor description specifies 86 keys, while the F75 Max vendor listing specifies 80 keys.
Both support Bluetooth and 2.4GHz wireless, as well as wired USB-C connections. Each is listed with a 4000mAh battery.
The F75 Max lists 1000Hz polling for wired and 2.4GHz modes. A polling-rate figure is not listed for the K86.
Both keyboards are listed as hot-swappable and support 3- and 5-pin switches. The F75 Max vendor description also says its stabilizers can be swapped for screw-in stabilizers.
The ATTACK SHARK K86 is listed with an aluminum case. The AULA F75 Max is listed with an ABS plastic case.
Both are listed with a TFT screen and knob support. The K86 vendor description says its screen shows keyboard status, while the F75 Max description lists time, battery, and connection status.
The K86 weighs 930g, while the F75 Max weighs 960g. Both have a listed 4000mAh battery and tri-mode connectivity.
The F75 Max vendor description names foam and silicone layers, an IXPE switch pad, a PET sound-enhancement pad, bottom foam, and bottom silicone. It also specifies a gasket mount and flex-cut PC plate.
The K86 vendor description specifies gasket mounting, a PC plate, added gaskets, EVA PCB foam, bottom foam, and an IXPE switch pad. Its listing also describes triple sound-absorbing foam.
Both support hot-swappable 3- and 5-pin switches. The F75 Max has the extra stated option of swapping in screw-in stabilizers, while the K86 listing does not mention stabilizer replacement.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.