Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Nov 11, 2026

ATTACK SHARK K86 vs AULA F75Screen vs Sound & Gaming Features

Choose the Attack Shark K86 for its unique TFT screen and visual customization, or the Aula F75 for its superior acoustic tuning and dedicated gaming features.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Sound & Gaming Features

AULA F75

EPOMAKER x AULA F75

4.5 (510)

$42at Epomaker

90-day low

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

ATTACK SHARK K86

Screen

Build quality in the top 20% of 75% boards under $100.

If you want

  • Features a smart TFT color display for showing status, custom GIFs, and settings.
  • All-aluminum case construction.
  • Includes side RGB lighting in addition to per-key RGB.

Get the

AULA F75

Sound & Gaming Features

Build quality in the top 30% of 75% boards under $50.

If you want

  • Includes a rapid trigger feature and a specified 1000 Hz polling rate for gaming.
  • Comprehensive five-layer sound dampening with Poron foam, IXPE, PET, and silicone.
  • Offers silent linear switch options for quieter typing.

Rules this board out

  • North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.

Bottom line

Your primary need dictates the choice. If a customizable screen, all-metal build, and visual flair are your top priorities, the Attack Shark K86 is the clear candidate. If you value a deeply tuned typing sound, pre-lubricated silent switches, and verified gaming performance features, the Aula F75 is the more capable tool. Both represent strong values in the compact wireless keyboard segment.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

ATTACK SHARK K86

AULA F75

  • Case material

    Aluminum

    Plastic

  • Switch options

    Linear

    Linear, Silent

  • Display

    TFT

    None

    A case display rather than a typing feature

  • Weight

    930 g

    1,023 g

    Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel

  • Keycaps

    PBT

    ABS, PBT

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • ATTACK SHARK K86
  • AULA F75
Performance
68
81
Build quality
76
76
Productivity
85
93
Customizability
75
82
Portability
81
83

What they share

  • Layout size: 75%
  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • Battery: 4,000 mAh
  • Mount style: Gasket Mount
  • Knob
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The Aula F75 takes the lead for gaming and office use due to its listed gaming features and superior silent acoustics. For travel and visual customization, the Attack Shark K86 is stronger with its lighter weight and TFT display. Programming is a tie, while modders will appreciate the Aula F75's detailed internal construction. Content creators may favor the K86 for its screen and aesthetic controls.

For gaming

Pick the AULA F75

  • The Aula F75 lists a 1000 Hz polling rate and a rapid trigger feature, which are explicitly mentioned for gaming performance.
  • Its vendor description emphasizes an ultra-responsive, low-latency connection.
  • It includes screw-in stabilizers for more consistent keypresses during fast actions.

Full specs

ATTACK SHARK K86 vs AULA F75 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

11 of 23 specs differ

ATTACK SHARK K86

AULA F75

Typing & switches

Switch options

Linear
Linear, Silent

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
Gasket Mount

Sound dampening

Yes
Yes

Screw-in stabilizers

No
Yes

Layout

Layout size

75%
75%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Knob

Yes
Yes

Display

TFT
None

Media keys

No
Yes

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

—
1,000 Hz

Battery

4,000 mAh
4,000 mAh

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum
Plastic

Keycaps

PBT
ABS, PBT

Weight

930 g
1,023 g

Dimensions

35 x 380 x 150 mm
43 x 143 x 323 mm

Backlight

RGB
RGB, south-facing

Firmware & software

N-key rollover

No
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
Yes

Extras

Released

2024
2023

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

AULA F755 stores

FAQ

ATTACK SHARK K86 vs AULA F75: your questions

The Aula F75 is better suited for quiet environments. It offers silent linear switch options and its vendor description highlights a five-layer sound dampening system specifically designed to reduce typing noise and resonance, creating a more focused typing environment.

Yes, the Attack Shark K86 features a CNC metal knob. According to its vendor page, this knob can be used to quickly adjust settings including volume, alongside connection mode and backlight effects.

Yes, both the Attack Shark K86 and Aula F75 are hot-swappable. The K86 uses TTC E-Sport sockets compatible with 3 and 5 pin switches, while the Aula F75 features full-key hot-swap functionality.

Both keyboards are listed with the same 4000mAh battery capacity. Actual battery life will depend on usage patterns, such as RGB brightness and wireless mode, but the capacity is identical according to the specifications.

The Aula F75 lists features relevant to competitive gaming, including a 1000 Hz polling rate and a rapid trigger function. Its vendor description also mentions an ultra-responsive, low-latency connection, which are positive indicators for gaming performance.

The Attack Shark K86's TFT color display can show keyboard status, connection mode, battery level, date, time, and custom GIF images. This allows for at-a-glance information and personalization without needing software running on your computer.

Both use PBT keycaps, but the profiles differ. The Aula F75 uses Cherry-profile double-shot PBT keycaps. The Attack Shark K86 uses double-shot PBT keycaps, but the specific profile is not stated in its provided description.

The Aula F75 may be more beginner-friendly for sound mods as it comes with an extensive five-layer acoustic package already installed, including Poron foam and a silicone pad. Its screw-in stabilizers are also generally preferred and easier to tune than clip-in variants.

Yes, both the Attack Shark K86 and Aula F75 list Mac and Windows support in their extra features. The K86's vendor description also explicitly mentions Win/MAC compatibility on its display.

Both keyboards use a gasket mount design. The Attack Shark K86 uses a PC plate and includes gaskets, EVA PCB foam, bottom foam, and an IXPE switch pad. The Aula F75's gasket mount is part of its broader five-layer sound-dampening structure.

The Attack Shark K86 lists 18 customizable RGB modes and 9 colors, plus 6 unique side lighting modes. The Aula F75 features RGB illumination with 16.8 million colors, but the number of preset modes is not specified in the provided information.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.