Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Oct 21, 2026

ATTACK SHARK K86 vs AULA F75Screen vs Sound & Gaming Features

Choose the Attack Shark K86 for its unique TFT screen and visual customization, or the Aula F75 for its superior acoustic tuning and dedicated gaming features.

EPOMAKER x AULA F75

Sound & Gaming Features

AULA F75

4.5 · 509 reviews

from$49at Epomaker

Shop nowCompare 2 stores

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

ATTACK SHARK K86

Screen

If you want

  • Features a smart TFT color display for showing status, custom GIFs, and settings.
  • All-aluminum case construction.
  • Includes side RGB lighting in addition to per-key RGB.

And can live with

  • Lacks detailed information on specific gaming features like polling rate or rapid trigger.
  • Sound dampening is described as triple foam, but specifics are less detailed than the competitor.
  • Switch options appear limited to a single linear type (Custom Blue Whale).

Get the

AULA F75

Sound & Gaming Features

If you want

  • Includes a rapid trigger feature and a specified 1000 Hz polling rate for gaming.
  • Comprehensive five-layer sound dampening with Poron foam, IXPE, PET, and silicone.
  • Offers silent linear switch options for quieter typing.

And can live with

  • Heavier at 1023g, which may affect portability.
  • No built-in screen for status or customization.
  • Case material is listed as a combination of plastic and aluminum, not full aluminum.

Bottom line

Your primary need dictates the choice. If a customizable screen, all-metal build, and visual flair are your top priorities, the Attack Shark K86 is the clear candidate. If you value a deeply tuned typing sound, pre-lubricated silent switches, and verified gaming performance features, the Aula F75 is the more capable tool. Both represent strong values in the compact wireless keyboard segment.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

ATTACK SHARK K86

AULA F75

  • Case material

    Aluminum

    Plastic

  • Switch options

    Linear

    Linear, Silent

  • Display

    TFT

    None

  • Weight

    930 g

    1,023 g

  • Keycaps

    PBT

    ABS, PBT

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • ATTACK SHARK K86
  • AULA F75
Performance
69
64
Build quality
77
66
Productivity
86
92
Customizability
75
82
Portability
81
82

What they share

  • Layout size: 75%
  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • Battery: 4,000 mAh
  • Mount style: Gasket Mount
  • Knob
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The Aula F75 takes the lead for gaming and office use due to its listed gaming features and superior silent acoustics. For travel and visual customization, the Attack Shark K86 is stronger with its lighter weight and TFT display. Programming is a tie, while modders will appreciate the Aula F75's detailed internal construction. Content creators may favor the K86 for its screen and aesthetic controls.

For gaming

Pick the AULA F75

  • The Aula F75 lists a 1000 Hz polling rate and a rapid trigger feature, which are explicitly mentioned for gaming performance.
  • Its vendor description emphasizes an ultra-responsive, low-latency connection.
  • It includes screw-in stabilizers for more consistent keypresses during fast actions.

From real owners

What owners say

Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.

ATTACK SHARK K86

No owner reviews collected yet.

AULA F75

4.5

509 owner reviews

Praise
“Works exactly as intended and still works as new. The 2.4 GHz Receiver doesn't communicate correctly and isn't reliable but on BT and Cable it works perfectly”
MegaNoobyYTVerified buyer· via Epomaker
Critique
“I made an order for EPOMAKER x AULA 75 with express shipping on 27/1/24. Emailed the team TWICE. Now its 19/3/24, and i still dont have the item. Very poor service”
Faisal A.Verified buyer· via Epomaker

Full specs

ATTACK SHARK K86 vs AULA F75 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

11 of 23 specs differ

ATTACK SHARK K86

AULA F75

Typing & switches

Switch options

Linear
Linear, Silent

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
Gasket Mount

Sound dampening

Yes
Yes

Screw-in stabilizers

No
Yes

Layout

Layout size

75%
75%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Knob

Yes
Yes

Display

TFT
None

Media keys

No
Yes

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

—
1,000 Hz

Battery

4,000 mAh
4,000 mAh

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum
Plastic

Keycaps

PBT
ABS, PBT

Weight

930 g
1,023 g

Dimensions

35 x 380 x 150 mm
43 x 143 x 323 mm

Backlight

RGB
RGB, south-facing

Firmware & software

N-key rollover

No
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
Yes

Extras

Released

2024
2023

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

  • AmazonGlobal

    Check price
    Visit
  • WhatGeekCN

    Out of stock
    $67Visit
AULA F755 stores
  • EpomakerUS

    In stock
    $49Visit
  • VelocifireCN

    In stock
    $66Visit
  • AmazonGlobal

    Check price
    Visit
  • WhatGeekCN

    Out of stock
    $67Visit

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

FAQ

ATTACK SHARK K86 vs AULA F75: your questions

The Aula F75 is better suited for quiet environments. It offers silent linear switch options and its vendor description highlights a five-layer sound dampening system specifically designed to reduce typing noise and resonance, creating a more focused typing environment.

Yes, the Attack Shark K86 features a CNC metal knob. According to its vendor page, this knob can be used to quickly adjust settings including volume, alongside connection mode and backlight effects.

Yes, both the Attack Shark K86 and Aula F75 are hot-swappable. The K86 uses TTC E-Sport sockets compatible with 3 and 5 pin switches, while the Aula F75 features full-key hot-swap functionality.

Both keyboards are listed with the same 4000mAh battery capacity. Actual battery life will depend on usage patterns, such as RGB brightness and wireless mode, but the capacity is identical according to the specifications.

The Aula F75 lists features relevant to competitive gaming, including a 1000 Hz polling rate and a rapid trigger function. Its vendor description also mentions an ultra-responsive, low-latency connection, which are positive indicators for gaming performance.

The Attack Shark K86's TFT color display can show keyboard status, connection mode, battery level, date, time, and custom GIF images. This allows for at-a-glance information and personalization without needing software running on your computer.

Both use PBT keycaps, but the profiles differ. The Aula F75 uses Cherry-profile double-shot PBT keycaps. The Attack Shark K86 uses double-shot PBT keycaps, but the specific profile is not stated in its provided description.

The Aula F75 may be more beginner-friendly for sound mods as it comes with an extensive five-layer acoustic package already installed, including Poron foam and a silicone pad. Its screw-in stabilizers are also generally preferred and easier to tune than clip-in variants.

Yes, both the Attack Shark K86 and Aula F75 list Mac and Windows support in their extra features. The K86's vendor description also explicitly mentions Win/MAC compatibility on its display.

Both keyboards use a gasket mount design. The Attack Shark K86 uses a PC plate and includes gaskets, EVA PCB foam, bottom foam, and an IXPE switch pad. The Aula F75's gasket mount is part of its broader five-layer sound-dampening structure.

The Attack Shark K86 lists 18 customizable RGB modes and 9 colors, plus 6 unique side lighting modes. The Aula F75 features RGB illumination with 16.8 million colors, but the number of preset modes is not specified in the provided information.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.