Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Nov 7, 2026

ATTACK SHARK K86 vs AULA EA75 MaxAluminum vs Sound Tuning

Choose the Attack Shark K86 for its aluminum build at a lower cost, or the Epomaker EA75 Max for superior sound tuning and a silent switch option.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Sound Tuning

AULA EA75 Max

EPOMAKER x AULA EA75 Max

4.8 (16)

$67at Epomaker

90-day low

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

ATTACK SHARK K86

Aluminum

Build quality in the top 20% of 75% boards under $100.

If you want

  • Aluminum case construction for a potentially more premium feel.
  • Uses TTC E-sport hot-swap sockets claimed to improve stability by 46%.
  • Includes side RGB lighting in addition to per-key backlighting.

Get the

AULA EA75 Max

Sound Tuning

Build quality in the top 45% of 75% boards under $100.

If you want

  • Specifies a 1000Hz polling rate for wired and 2.4GHz modes, with listed latency figures.
  • Features a detailed five-layer sound dampening system for a tuned acoustic profile.
  • Offers a choice of linear or silent linear switches directly from the vendor.

Rules this board out

  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.

Bottom line

Your choice hinges on material preference versus acoustic and performance specifications. The Attack Shark K86 is the straightforward pick if an aluminum chassis is your top priority within its price range. For users who prioritize a well-damped typing sound, verified high polling rate for gaming, or the option for silent switches, the Epomaker EA75 Max provides more concrete, detailed features to justify its cost.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

ATTACK SHARK K86

AULA EA75 Max

  • Battery

    4,000 mAh

    5,000 mAh

    A larger battery means fewer cables during the day

  • Case material

    Aluminum

    ABS

  • Switch options

    Linear

    Linear, Silent

  • Weight

    930 g

    958.5 g

    Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel

  • Backlight

    RGB

    RGB, south-facing

    RGB for looks and low light rather than speed

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • ATTACK SHARK K86
  • AULA EA75 Max
Performance
68
78
Build quality
76
68
Productivity
85
83
Customizability
75
73
Portability
81
79

What they share

  • Layout size: 75%
  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • Mount style: Gasket Mount
  • Knob
  • Display: TFT
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The Epomaker EA75 Max holds slight advantages for gaming due to its specified polling rate and for content creation with its silent switch option. It is also the stronger choice for modders interested in its detailed, multi-layer sound dampening. For office use, programming, and travel, the keyboards are closely matched, offering the same core wireless functionality and compact layout. The Attack Shark K86's primary appeal is its aluminum construction, which may offer a more premium feel at its price point.

For gaming

Pick the AULA EA75 Max

  • The Epomaker EA75 Max lists a 1000Hz polling rate for its wired and 2.4GHz modes, which the Attack Shark K86's specifications do not mention.
  • It features N-Key Rollover for anti-ghosting during complex key presses.
  • The manufacturer states it is designed for FPS and rhythm games with stable performance across all connection modes.

Full specs

ATTACK SHARK K86 vs AULA EA75 Max specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

8 of 23 specs differ

ATTACK SHARK K86

AULA EA75 Max

Typing & switches

Switch options

Linear
Linear, Silent

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
Gasket Mount

Sound dampening

Yes
Yes

Layout

Layout size

75%
75%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Knob

Yes
Yes

Display

TFT
TFT

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

—
1,000 Hz

Battery

4,000 mAh
5,000 mAhBetter

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum
ABS

Plate material

—
Polycarbonate

Keycaps

PBT
PBT

Weight

930 g
958.5 g

Dimensions

35 x 380 x 150 mm
43 x 333 x 147 mm

Typing angle

—
5°

Backlight

RGB
RGB, south-facing

Firmware & software

N-key rollover

No
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
Yes

Extras

Released

2024
2026

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

FAQ

ATTACK SHARK K86 vs AULA EA75 Max: your questions

Build quality differs in focus. The Attack Shark K86 uses an aluminum case, which typically offers a more rigid and premium feel. The Epomaker EA75 Max uses an ABS plastic case but incorporates a more complex, five-layer internal sound dampening system and a polycarbonate plate for its gasket mount.

The Epomaker EA75 Max is marketed for gaming. Its technical specifications list a 1000Hz polling rate and 1-8ms latency for wired and 2.4GHz modes, and it features N-Key Rollover to prevent ghosting. The manufacturer states it is suitable for FPS and rhythm games.

The Attack Shark K86 vendor page mentions driver software is available for download. This software is indicated to allow personalization of RGB modes, light colors, and key settings.

Yes. The Epomaker EA75 Max is listed with an optional 'Cotton Candy' switch type, which is specified as a silent linear switch. The keyboard's hot-swappable socket also allows you to install other compatible silent switches.

Based on the listed battery capacities, the Epomaker EA75 Max has a larger 5000mAh battery compared to the Attack Shark K86's 4000mAh battery. Actual battery life will depend on usage patterns like RGB brightness and connection mode.

Both keyboards use double-shot PBT keycaps. The Epomaker EA75 Max specifically mentions its keycaps are Cherry profile, which have a sculpted shape. The Attack Shark K86's keycap profile is not specified in the provided details.

Yes, both the Attack Shark K86 and Epomaker EA75 Max list Mac support among their compatibility features. The Epomaker's documentation notes that Mac modifier keycaps are not included.

According to its product page, the Epomaker EA75 Max includes the keyboard, a USB A-to-C cable, a 2.4GHz receiver, four extra switches, a 2-in-1 keycap and switch puller, and user manuals.

Both the Attack Shark K86 and the Epomaker EA75 Max use a gasket mount design. This mounting style uses rubber or silicone gaskets to isolate the plate from the case, aiming to provide a softer, more cushioned typing feel.

The vendor descriptions for both keyboards indicate the TFT screen can display custom GIFs. The Epomaker EA75 Max's specifications note that onboard memory saves images and GIFs for use across devices, suggesting customization is possible via its software.

The Epomaker EA75 Max may be more beginner-friendly for sound mods, as it comes with extensive factory sound dampening (five layers) and pre-lubed switches. Its inclusion of four extra switches also allows for immediate experimentation without additional purchases.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.