ATTACK SHARK K86 vs Royal Kludge R65
Get the Royal Kludge R65 for qmk and via.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Which one should you get?
Get the
ATTACK SHARK K86
Build quality in the top 20% of 75% boards under $100.
- No numpad.
Get the
Royal Kludge R65
QMK
Build quality in the top 15% of 65% boards under $100.
- 65% layout. No function row and no numpad.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
ATTACK SHARK K86
Royal Kludge R65
Layout size
75%
65%
Display
TFT
None
A case display rather than a typing feature
Weight
930 g
580 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
QMK
No
Yes
The deep option when you want to remap every key
VIA
No
Yes
GUI remapping without compiling firmware
- ATTACK SHARK K86
- Royal Kludge R65
- Performance
- 6866
- Build quality
- 7684
- Productivity
- 8589
- Customizability
- 7588
- Portability
- 8185
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Case material: Aluminum
- Switch options: Linear
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Knob
ATTACK SHARK K86 vs Royal Kludge R65 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
6 of 21 specs differ
ATTACK SHARK K86
Royal Kludge R65
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
QMK
VIA
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.