ATTACK SHARK K86 vs Redragon K708Battery Life vs Performance
Choose the Attack Shark K86 for its confirmed large battery, or the Redragon K708 if you prioritize potential gaming performance and a slightly lighter build.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Which one should you get?
Get the
ATTACK SHARK K86
Battery Life
- Includes a 4000mAh rechargeable battery for extended wireless use.
- Comes with a keycap and switch puller tool in the box.
- Uses double-shot PBT keycaps according to its vendor description.
- Heavier at 930g, which may affect portability.
- Larger footprint (380mm x 150mm) than the Redragon.
- No explicit mention of N-Key Rollover in its specifications.
Get the
Redragon K708
Performance
- Lighter weight at 850g.
- Explicitly lists N-Key Rollover as a feature.
- Vendor description mentions the inclusion of four replacement switches.
- No battery capacity is listed in the provided specifications.
- Keycap material is listed as a mix of PBT and ABS, which may be less durable than full PBT.
- Slightly taller at 43mm compared to the Attack Shark's 35mm height.
Your primary need dictates the choice. For users who prioritize wireless endurance and a more complete accessory kit, the Attack Shark K86 is the clear pick. If a lighter keyboard with explicitly stated anti-ghosting for gaming is more important, the Redragon K708 is the better option. Both deliver excellent core features like hot-swap, gasket mounts, and TFT screens at a competitive price.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
ATTACK SHARK K86
Redragon K708
Weight
930 g
850 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
Keycaps
PBT
ABS, PBT
N-key rollover
No
Yes
Dimensions
35 x 380 x 150 mm
43 x 335 x 140 mm
- ATTACK SHARK K86
- Redragon K708
- Performance
- 6979
- Build quality
- 7776
- Productivity
- 8583
- Customizability
- 7573
- Portability
- 8277
- Layout size: 75%
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Case material: Aluminum
- Switch options: Linear
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
What will you mostly use it for?
The Redragon K708 takes a slight lead for gaming and travel due to its lighter weight and listed N-Key Rollover. The Attack Shark K86 is better suited for programming and content creation, thanks to its larger battery and more expansive key layout. For office use and modding, the keyboards are evenly matched, sharing core features like connectivity, hot-swap, and sound dampening.
Pick the Redragon K708
- The Redragon K708 listing explicitly mentions N-Key Rollover, a feature not stated for the Attack Shark K86.
- The Redragon K708 is slightly lighter at 850g, which may be preferable for quick desk movements.
- Both have tri-mode connectivity for low-latency 2.4GHz gaming.
ATTACK SHARK K86 vs Redragon K708 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
4 of 20 specs differ
ATTACK SHARK K86
Redragon K708
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
ATTACK SHARK K86 vs Redragon K708: your questions
The Attack Shark K86 has a confirmed 4000mAh battery, which suggests longer wireless operation. The Redragon K708's product listing does not specify a battery capacity, making a direct comparison impossible.
Yes, both keyboards feature hot-swappable sockets. The Attack Shark K86 uses TTC E-Sport sockets, while the Redragon K708 is compatible with most 3-pin and 5-pin switches from brands like Gateron and Akko.
Yes, both the Attack Shark K86 and Redragon K708 list Mac support among their features, making them compatible with macOS systems.
Both keyboards use a gasket mount design. The Attack Shark K86 pairs this with a PC plate, while the Redragon K708 description emphasizes a soft elastic structure for typing comfort.
The Redragon K708 may have an edge for gaming as its specifications explicitly include N-Key Rollover, a feature not mentioned for the Attack Shark K86. It is also 80 grams lighter, which some gamers prefer.
The Attack Shark K86 vendor page mentions triple sound-absorbing foam, including EVA PCB foam, bottom foam, and an IXPE switch pad. The Redragon K708 uses Poron and silicone pads on the PCB and plate to reduce noise.
No. The Attack Shark K86 uses PBT double-shot keycaps. The Redragon K708's specifications list its keycap material as both PBT and ABS, which may indicate a mix or specific keys made from different materials.
The Attack Shark K86 comes with Custom Blue Whale linear switches. The Redragon K708 comes with pre-lubed linear Sunuo switches. Both are linear switch types.
Yes, both the Attack Shark K86 and Redragon K708 feature a TFT color display and a CNC metal knob for adjusting settings like volume, brightness, and connection mode.
The Attack Shark K86 includes a keycap and switch puller in its package contents. The Redragon K708 includes four replacement switches. Both come with a USB-C cable and user manual.
Yes, both are tri-mode keyboards. They support connection via USB-C wired, 2.4GHz wireless, and Bluetooth, allowing you to pair with multiple devices and switch between them.
Yes, the Redragon K708 product listing states its hot-swap sockets are fully compatible with both 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.