Compare ATTACK SHARK K86 vs Redragon K708 Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between two similarly priced, feature-rich 75% mechanical keyboards. Both offer tri-mode connectivity, TFT screens, gasket mounts, and hot-swap sockets, making the choice difficult. The decision hinges on whether you value the Attack Shark's confirmed large-capacity battery for wireless longevity or lean towards the Redragon's potential for a more responsive gaming experience and lighter weight.

Model
	78	78	Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	0.0 stars (0 reviews)	0.0 stars (0 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Equipped with a 4000 mAh battery Weighs about 930 g Sized at 35 x 380 x 150 mm Features PBT keycaps	Features N-key rollover Weighs about 850 g Sized at 43 x 335 x 140 mm Features PBT, ABS keycaps
Score	Scores Performance: 68.1 Build Quality: 76.1 Productivity: 85.3 Customizability: 75.9 Portability: 81.9	Scores Performance: 79.1 Build Quality: 75.9 Productivity: 83.8 Customizability: 74 Portability: 77.7
Name	Name ATTACK SHARK K86	Name Redragon K708
Release year	Release year 2024	Release year 2024
Switch Options	Switch Options Linear	Switch Options Linear
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 75%	Layout Size 75%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support TFT	Display Support TFT
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless	Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless
Polling Rate	Polling Rate -	Polling Rate -
Battery capacity	Battery capacity 4000 mAh	Battery capacity -
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style Gasket Mount	Mount Style Gasket Mount
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight Rgb	Backlight Rgb
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material Aluminum	Case Material Aluminum
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material PBT	Keycaps Material PBT, ABS
Dimensions	Dimensions 35 x 380 x 150 mm	Dimensions 43 x 335 x 140 mm
Weight	Weight 930g	Weight 850g

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

Your primary need dictates the choice. For users who prioritize wireless endurance and a more complete accessory kit, the Attack Shark K86 is the clear pick. If a lighter keyboard with explicitly stated anti-ghosting for gaming is more important, the Redragon K708 is the better option. Both deliver excellent core features like hot-swap, gasket mounts, and TFT screens at a competitive price.

ATTACK SHARK K86

+Includes a 4000mAh rechargeable battery for extended wireless use.
+Comes with a keycap and switch puller tool in the box.
+Uses double-shot PBT keycaps according to its vendor description.
+Features a PC plate and triple sound-absorbing foam (EVA, bottom foam, IXPE pad) for a specific typing feel.
+Offers 18 RGB backlight modes with side lighting.

−Heavier at 930g, which may affect portability.
−Larger footprint (380mm x 150mm) than the Redragon.
−No explicit mention of N-Key Rollover in its specifications.

Redragon K708

+Lighter weight at 850g.
+Explicitly lists N-Key Rollover as a feature.
+Vendor description mentions the inclusion of four replacement switches.
+Uses a combination of Poron and silicone pads for sound dampening.

−No battery capacity is listed in the provided specifications.
−Keycap material is listed as a mix of PBT and ABS, which may be less durable than full PBT.
−Slightly taller at 43mm compared to the Attack Shark's 35mm height.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The Redragon K708 takes a slight lead for gaming and travel due to its lighter weight and listed N-Key Rollover. The Attack Shark K86 is better suited for programming and content creation, thanks to its larger battery and more expansive key layout. For office use and modding, the keyboards are evenly matched, sharing core features like connectivity, hot-swap, and sound dampening.

GamingRedragon K708

•The Redragon K708 listing explicitly mentions N-Key Rollover, a feature not stated for the Attack Shark K86.
•The Redragon K708 is slightly lighter at 850g, which may be preferable for quick desk movements.
•Both have tri-mode connectivity for low-latency 2.4GHz gaming.

OfficeTie

•Both keyboards offer tri-mode connectivity for easy switching between multiple devices.
•Each includes Mac and Windows support.
•Both feature sound-dampening foam for a quieter typing experience.

ProgrammingATTACK SHARK K86

•The Attack Shark K86 has an 86-key layout which retains more navigation keys compared to the Redragon's 81 keys plus knob.
•Its vendor description highlights a PC plate for a bouncier feel, which some typists prefer.
•The confirmed 4000mAh battery supports longer wireless coding sessions.

TravelRedragon K708

•The Redragon K708 is 80g lighter (850g vs 930g).
•It has slightly smaller dimensions (335mm x 140mm vs 380mm x 150mm).
•Both are wireless, eliminating the need for a cable during mobile use.

ModdingTie

•Both keyboards are hot-swappable and support 3-pin and 5-pin switches.
•Both use a gasket mount design, which is favored by modders.
•Each comes pre-installed with sound-dampening foam layers.

Content CreationATTACK SHARK K86

•The Attack Shark K86's vendor page details 18 RGB modes and side lighting for more visual customization.
•The larger battery is advantageous for long, untethered editing sessions.
•The inclusion of a keycap and switch puller in the box aids in personalization.