Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Nov 7, 2026

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE vs Redragon FIZZ K617 HE65% vs 60% Hall Effect

Choose the Attack Shark X68 HE for its 65% layout and hot-swap capability, or the Redragon FIZZ K617 HE for a more compact 60% form factor at a potentially lower cost.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE

65%

Build quality in the bottom 40% of 65% boards under $100.

If you want

  • 65% layout includes dedicated arrow keys for better productivity.
  • Aluminum case construction for a more premium and sturdy feel.
  • Hot-swappable PCB allows for easy switch replacement.

Rules this board out

  • Magnetic switches only. Standard MX switches will not fit.
  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
  • No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
  • 65% layout. No function row and no numpad.

Get the

Redragon FIZZ K617 HE

60% Hall Effect

Build quality in the bottom 45% of 60% boards under $50.

If you want

  • More compact and lighter 60% layout saves desk space and is easier to transport.
  • Includes practical accessories like a detachable strap and two red replacement keycaps.
  • Redragon's listing mentions a web-based driver for cross-platform software feature access.

Rules this board out

  • Magnetic switches only. Standard MX switches will not fit.
  • Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.

Bottom line

Your primary need dictates the choice. If you require arrow keys, hot-swap capability, and a more substantial aluminum build, the Attack Shark X68 HE is the logical pick. If maximum portability, a lower cost, and a minimalist 60% form factor are your priorities, the Redragon FIZZ K617 HE delivers identical core gaming performance in a more compact package. Both are compelling entries into the budget Hall Effect market.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE

Redragon FIZZ K617 HE

  • Layout size

    65%

    60%

  • Case material

    Aluminum

    Plastic

  • Switch options

    Clicky, Linear, Magnetic

    Linear, Magnetic

  • Weight

    950 g

    600 g

    Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel

  • Layout standard

    ANSI

    ANSI, ISO, ISO-DE, ISO-ES

    ISO and JIS exist so regional layouts fit

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • ATTACK SHARK X68 HE
  • Redragon FIZZ K617 HE
Performance
92
96
Build quality
58
60
Productivity
59
54
Customizability
62
59
Portability
71
71

What they share

  • Hall effect (magnetic)
  • Rapid trigger
  • Connection: Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • Max polling rate: 8,000 Hz
  • Keycaps: PBT
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The Attack Shark X68 HE wins in most productivity-focused categories like office work, programming, and content creation due to its more functional 65% layout and hot-swap feature. The Redragon FIZZ K617 HE is the clear choice for travel due to its lighter weight and more compact 60% size. For pure gaming performance, the keyboards are evenly matched on paper, offering identical high-end polling rates and rapid trigger support.

For gaming

It's a tie

  • Both feature an 8000 Hz polling rate and 0.125ms latency for ultra-fast response.
  • Both support rapid trigger technology and adjustable actuation points for magnetic switches.
  • Both are wired-only, ensuring a stable connection without wireless interference.

Full specs

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE vs Redragon FIZZ K617 HE specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

10 of 21 specs differ

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE

Redragon FIZZ K617 HE

Typing & switches

Switch options

Clicky, Linear, Magnetic
Linear, Magnetic

Hall effect (magnetic)

Yes
Yes

Rapid trigger

Yes
Yes

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

—
Bottom Mount, Plate Mount

Layout

Layout size

65%
60%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI, ISO, ISO-DE, ISO-ES

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Display

None
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Wired
Wired

Max polling rate

8,000 Hz
8,000 Hz

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum
Plastic

Plate material

—
Plastic

Keycaps

PBT
PBT

Weight

950 g
600 g

Dimensions

60 x 150 x 350 mm
5 x 320 x 140 mm

Backlight

RGB, south-facing
RGB

Firmware & software

N-key rollover

No
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
No

Extras

Released

2025
2024

For EU buyers

ISO layouts by store

Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE

No ISO layout at the stores we track.

Redragon FIZZ K617 HE

  • Redragon

    ISO-DE

    In stockShips to you

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

FAQ

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE vs Redragon FIZZ K617 HE: your questions

The core differences are layout and build. The Attack Shark X68 HE is a 65% keyboard with an aluminum case and hot-swappable switches. The Redragon FIZZ K617 HE is a 60% keyboard with a plastic case and non-hot-swappable switches. Both share an 8000Hz polling rate and Hall Effect magnetic switches.

No. Only the Attack Shark X68 HE is listed as hot-swappable, compatible with N-pole downward magnetic switches. The Redragon FIZZ K617 HE product specifications explicitly state it is not hot-swappable.

The Attack Shark X68 HE lists Mac support in its features. The Redragon FIZZ K617 HE manufacturer states it is not compatible with Mac or non-PC platforms. Therefore, the Attack Shark is the only viable option for Mac users.

No. Both the Attack Shark X68 HE and the Redragon FIZZ K617 HE are wired-only keyboards, using a detachable USB-C cable for connection.

Both keyboards use linear magnetic Hall Effect switches. The Attack Shark uses OUTEMU White Jade Magnetic switches. The Redragon uses its own dedicated magnetic switches, which the manufacturer notes are incompatible with other brands' Hall Effect switches.

The Redragon FIZZ K617 HE is more portable. It is a 60% keyboard weighing 600g and includes a detachable strap for carrying. The Attack Shark X68 HE is a heavier 65% keyboard at 950g.

Yes. Both the Attack Shark X68 HE and the Redragon FIZZ K617 HE support rapid trigger technology, allowing for adjustable actuation points for their magnetic switches.

The Attack Shark X68 HE uses PBT double-shot keycaps. The keycap material for the Redragon FIZZ K617 HE is not specified in the provided metadata, though it includes two red replacement keycaps.

Both keyboards have a maximum polling rate of 8000 Hz (8KHz), which provides a theoretical latency as low as 0.125ms for fast input reporting.

According to its package contents list, the Redragon FIZZ K617 HE includes the keyboard, a detachable USB Type-C cable, a detachable strap, a switch puller, two red replacement keycaps, and a user manual.

Yes. Both keyboards allow you to adjust the actuation point of their magnetic switches. The Attack Shark X68 HE lists an adjustable range from 0.1mm to 3.4mm. The Redragon FIZZ K617 HE also lists an adjustable actuation point.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.