Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Nov 7, 2026

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE vs Redragon FIZZ K617Hall Effect vs Budget 60%

Choose the Attack Shark X68 HE for competitive gaming features, or the Redragon FIZZ K617 for a more affordable and compact layout.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE

Hall Effect

Build quality in the bottom 40% of 65% boards under $100.

If you want

  • Features Hall Effect magnetic switches with adjustable actuation from 0.1mm.
  • High 8000 Hz polling rate and 0.125ms latency for competitive gaming.
  • Includes advanced gaming features like Rapid Trigger, Snap Tap, and Dynamic Keystrokes.

Rules this board out

  • Magnetic switches only. Standard MX switches will not fit.
  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
  • No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
  • 65% layout. No function row and no numpad.

Get the

Redragon FIZZ K617

Budget 60%

Build quality in the top 50% of 60% boards under $50.

If you want

  • More affordable price point.
  • Lighter weight of 590g and compact 60% layout for portability.
  • Hot-swappable socket supports both 3-pin and 5-pin switches.

Rules this board out

  • Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.

Bottom line

Your choice depends on your primary need. For serious gaming where every millisecond counts, the Attack Shark X68 HE's Hall Effect switches and 8KHz polling are compelling. If you need a portable, budget-friendly keyboard for general use and are willing to adapt to a 60% layout, the Redragon FIZZ K617 offers excellent value. Consider how much you value arrow keys and premium materials versus cost savings.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE

Redragon FIZZ K617

  • Layout size

    65%

    60%

  • Hall effect (magnetic)

    Yes

    No

    Adjustable actuation helps in games and not in normal typing

  • Rapid trigger

    Yes

    No

    Faster resets help in games and not in normal typing

  • Max polling rate

    8,000 Hz

    1,000 Hz

    Higher polling helps competitive FPS and does nothing for typing

  • Case material

    Aluminum

    Plastic

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • ATTACK SHARK X68 HE
  • Redragon FIZZ K617
Performance
92
71
Build quality
58
61
Productivity
59
53
Customizability
62
67
Portability
71
70

What they share

  • Connection: Wired
  • Hot-swappable
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The Attack Shark X68 HE is the stronger choice for gaming, office work, programming, and content creation, primarily due to its high-performance specs and more functional 65% layout. The Redragon FIZZ K617 wins for travel thanks to its lighter weight and smaller size. For modding, both offer strong hot-swap foundations, making it a tie for enthusiasts focused on switch swapping.

For gaming

Pick the ATTACK SHARK X68 HE

  • The Attack Shark X68 HE features a 8000 Hz polling rate and 0.125ms latency for faster response.
  • It includes Hall Effect magnetic switches with adjustable actuation and Rapid Trigger support.
  • Its 65% layout retains arrow keys, which are useful for many games.

Full specs

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE vs Redragon FIZZ K617 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

14 of 20 specs differ

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE

Redragon FIZZ K617

Typing & switches

Switch options

Clicky, Linear, Magnetic
Clicky, Linear

Hall effect (magnetic)

Yes
No

Rapid trigger

Yes
No

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

—
Bottom Mount

Layout

Layout size

65%
60%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI, ISO, ISO-DE, ISO-ES, ISO-FR, ISO-IT, ISO-UK, JIS

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Display

None
LED

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Wired
Wired

Max polling rate

8,000 HzBetter
1,000 Hz

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum
Plastic

Keycaps

PBT
—

Weight

950 g
590 g

Dimensions

60 x 150 x 350 mm
38 x 99 x 36 mm

Backlight

RGB, south-facing
RGB

Firmware & software

N-key rollover

No
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
No

Extras

Released

2025
2021

For EU buyers

ISO layouts by store

Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE

No ISO layout at the stores we track.

Redragon FIZZ K617

  • Redragon

    ISO-UK

    In stockShips to you

  • Redragon

    ISO-FR

    In stockShips to you

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

FAQ

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE vs Redragon FIZZ K617: your questions

The Attack Shark X68 HE is designed for competitive gaming. It features a 8000 Hz polling rate, a claimed 0.125ms latency, and Hall Effect magnetic switches with Rapid Trigger support, which allow for adjustable actuation points to minimize input delay.

No, the Redragon FIZZ K617 uses a 60% layout, which does not include dedicated arrow keys. These functions are typically accessed through a function layer combination, which requires an adjustment period for new users.

Yes, both the Attack Shark X68 HE and the Redragon FIZZ K617 have hot-swappable sockets. The Attack Shark is compatible with N-pole downward magnetic switches, while the Redragon supports both 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches.

The Attack Shark X68 HE uses PBT double-shot keycaps, which are known for their resistance to shine and wear. The keycap material for the Redragon FIZZ K617 is not specified in the provided details.

The Redragon FIZZ K617 is more portable. It is significantly lighter at 590g compared to the Attack Shark's 950g, and its 60% layout (38 x 99 x 36 mm) is more compact than the 65% layout of the Attack Shark.

The Attack Shark X68 HE listing explicitly includes Mac support. The Redragon FIZZ K617 product description does not mention Mac compatibility, so it may be designed primarily for Windows.

The Attack Shark X68 HE features an aluminum case, which typically offers a more rigid and premium feel. The Redragon FIZZ K617 uses a plastic case, which contributes to its lower weight and cost.

Both keyboards have RGB backlighting. The Redragon FIZZ K617 offers 20 preset modes on-board and further customization through its dedicated software. The Attack Shark X68 HE has south-facing RGB LEDs, but the extent of its software customization is not detailed in the provided specs.

The Attack Shark X68 HE comes with OUTEMU White Jade magnetic (Hall Effect) switches. These are linear switches with a listed lifespan of 100 million keystrokes and a total travel of 3.8mm.

No, the polling rate for the Redragon FIZZ K617 is not listed in the provided specifications or product description. The Attack Shark X68 HE explicitly states an 8000 Hz polling rate.

Both keyboards include similar basic accessories: a USB Type-C cable and a user manual. Neither listing mentions additional keycaps or switch pullers in the standard package contents.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.