Compare ATTACK SHARK X68 HE vs Redragon FIZZ K617 Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between a feature-rich 65% gaming keyboard and a value-focused 60% model. The decision hinges on whether you prioritize high-performance specs like Hall Effect switches and 8KHz polling or a lower price and smaller footprint. Both are wired, hot-swappable, and offer RGB, making the core trade-off about performance tier versus cost and size.

Model
	70		Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	0.0 stars (0 reviews)	0.0 stars (0 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Released in 2025 Has Linear, Clicky, Magnetic switch options Available in a 65% layout Compatible with both Mac and Windows Utilizes Hall effect sensors Enables rapid trigger functionality Runs at a 8000 Hz polling rate Weighs about 950 g Sized at 60 x 150 x 350 mm Made with a Aluminum case Features PBT keycaps Offers Yes, Rgb, South-face, Rgb South-face RGB lighting	Released in 2021 Has Linear, Clicky switch options Available in a 60% layout Features N-key rollover Uses a Bottom Mount mounting style Weighs about 590 g Sized at 38 x 99 x 36 mm Made with a Plastic case Offers Yes, Rgb RGB lighting
Score	Scores Performance: 92.4 Build Quality: 63.5 Productivity: 66.6 Customizability: 67.5 Portability: 74.5	Scores Performance: 69.9 Build Quality: 55.1 Productivity: 52.4 Customizability: 56.6 Portability: 69.6
Name	Name ATTACK SHARK X68 HE	Name Redragon FIZZ K617
Release year	Release year 2025	Release year 2021
Switch Options	Switch Options Linear, Clicky, Magnetic	Switch Options Linear, Clicky
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 65%	Layout Size 60%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support	Display Support
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Wired, Wired only	Connection Wired, Wired only
Polling Rate	Polling Rate 8000 Hz	Polling Rate -
Battery capacity	Battery capacity -	Battery capacity -
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style -	Mount Style Bottom Mount
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight Rgb, South-face	Backlight Rgb
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material Aluminum	Case Material Plastic
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material PBT	Keycaps Material -
Dimensions	Dimensions 60 x 150 x 350 mm	Dimensions 38 x 99 x 36 mm
Weight	Weight 950g	Weight 590g

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

Your choice depends on your primary need. For serious gaming where every millisecond counts, the Attack Shark X68 HE's Hall Effect switches and 8KHz polling are compelling. If you need a portable, budget-friendly keyboard for general use and are willing to adapt to a 60% layout, the Redragon FIZZ K617 offers excellent value. Consider how much you value arrow keys and premium materials versus cost savings.

ATTACK SHARK X68 HE

+Features Hall Effect magnetic switches with adjustable actuation from 0.1mm.
+High 8000 Hz polling rate and 0.125ms latency for competitive gaming.
+Includes advanced gaming features like Rapid Trigger, Snap Tap, and Dynamic Keystrokes.
+Constructed with an aluminum case for a solid feel.
+Uses PBT double-shot keycaps for better durability.

−Significantly heavier at 950g, making it less portable.
−Priced higher than the Redragon FIZZ K617.
−Larger 65% footprint takes up more desk space than a 60% board.

Redragon FIZZ K617

+More affordable price point.
+Lighter weight of 590g and compact 60% layout for portability.
+Hot-swappable socket supports both 3-pin and 5-pin switches.
+Includes software for macro customization and lighting effects.
+Comes with a detachable USB Type-C cable.

−Plastic case construction feels less premium than aluminum.
−60% layout lacks dedicated arrow keys and function row.
−No listed polling rate or advanced gaming features like Rapid Trigger.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The Attack Shark X68 HE is the stronger choice for gaming, office work, programming, and content creation, primarily due to its high-performance specs and more functional 65% layout. The Redragon FIZZ K617 wins for travel thanks to its lighter weight and smaller size. For modding, both offer strong hot-swap foundations, making it a tie for enthusiasts focused on switch swapping.

GamingATTACK SHARK X68 HE

•The Attack Shark X68 HE features a 8000 Hz polling rate and 0.125ms latency for faster response.
•It includes Hall Effect magnetic switches with adjustable actuation and Rapid Trigger support.
•Its 65% layout retains arrow keys, which are useful for many games.

OfficeATTACK SHARK X68 HE

•The Attack Shark X68 HE's 65% layout includes dedicated arrow keys for spreadsheet navigation.
•Its aluminum case may provide a more premium feel on a desk.
•The manufacturer lists Mac/Win support.

ProgrammingATTACK SHARK X68 HE

•The 65% layout of the Attack Shark includes arrow keys, which are often preferred for coding.
•The PBT double-shot keycaps are noted for durability.
•South-facing RGB LEDs are compatible with more aftermarket keycap sets.

TravelRedragon FIZZ K617

•The Redragon FIZZ K617 is significantly lighter at 590g compared to 950g.
•Its 60% layout (38 x 99 x 36 mm) is more compact than the 65% Attack Shark.
•It is available at a lower price point, reducing risk for travel.

ModdingTie

•Both keyboards feature hot-swappable sockets for switch replacement.
•The Attack Shark is compatible with N-pole downward magnetic switches and has south-facing LEDs.
•The Redragon FIZZ K617 supports both 3-pin and 5-pin switches according to its listing.

Content CreationATTACK SHARK X68 HE

•The Attack Shark's 65% layout with arrow keys can be more efficient for timeline scrubbing and shortcuts.
•The aluminum case construction may offer better stability during intense typing sessions.
•Software features like Dynamic Keystrokes (DKS) and Mod-Tap could be leveraged for macro commands.