Compare AULA F75 Max vs Redragon Behemoth K724 Pro Differences Side by Side

This comparison is for buyers deciding between two feature-rich, 75% wireless mechanical keyboards with TFT screens and knobs. Both the AULA F75 Max and Redragon Behemoth K724 Pro offer tri-mode connectivity, gasket mounts, and hot-swappable sockets, making the choice difficult. The decision hinges on nuanced differences in sound design, ergonomics, and specific feature implementations.

Model
	81	70	Select a keyboard to compare
Rating	4.8 stars (44 reviews)	0.0 stars (0 reviews)
Purchase Options
Main differences	Released in 2024 Compatible with both Mac and Windows Features N-key rollover Includes screw-in stabilizers Runs at a 1000 Hz polling rate Equipped with a 4000 mAh battery Weighs about 960 g Sized at 44 x 328 x 143 mm Made with a ABS case Offers Yes, Rgb, South-face, Rgb South-face RGB lighting	Released in 2025 Weighs about 1190 g Sized at 37 x 335 x 37 mm Made with a Plastic case Offers Yes, Rgb RGB lighting
Score	Scores Performance: 79 Build Quality: 75.8 Productivity: 91.1 Customizability: 78.8 Portability: 80.5	Scores Performance: 65.6 Build Quality: 68.9 Productivity: 69.8 Customizability: 66.9 Portability: 74.5
Name	Name AULA F75 Max	Name Redragon Behemoth K724 Pro
Release year	Release year 2024	Release year 2025
Switch Options	Switch Options Linear	Switch Options Linear
Profile	Profile Normal Profile	Profile Normal Profile
Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable	Hot Swappable
Layout Size	Layout Size 75%	Layout Size 75%
Layout Standard	Layout Standard ANSI	Layout Standard ANSI
Layout Ergonomics	Layout Ergonomics Normal	Layout Ergonomics Normal
Knob Support	Knob Support	Knob Support
Display Support	Display Support TFT	Display Support TFT
Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support	Mac/Win Support
Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys	Multi-Media Keys
USB-C	USB-C	USB-C
USB passthrough	USB passthrough	USB passthrough
Connection	Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless	Connection Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired, Wireless
Polling Rate	Polling Rate 1000 Hz	Polling Rate -
Battery capacity	Battery capacity 4000 mAh	Battery capacity -
Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support	Hall Effect Support
QMK Support	QMK Support	QMK Support
VIA Support	VIA Support	VIA Support
VIAL Support	VIAL Support	VIAL Support
N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover	N-Key Rollover
Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger	Rapid Trigger
Mount Style	Mount Style Gasket Mount	Mount Style Gasket Mount
Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers	Screw in Stabilizers
Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening	Sound Dampening
Backlight	Backlight Rgb, South-face	Backlight Rgb
Case Colors	Case Colors	Case Colors
Case Material	Case Material ABS	Case Material Plastic
Keycaps Material	Keycaps Material PBT	Keycaps Material PBT
Dimensions	Dimensions 44 x 328 x 143 mm	Dimensions 37 x 335 x 37 mm
Weight	Weight 960g	Weight 1190g

*Something incorrect or missing? Please

let me know

!

Pros and Trade-offs

For most users, the AULA F75 Max is the recommended choice due to its more comprehensive feature set, better-documented performance specs, and thoughtful ergonomic design. Its advantages in sound tuning, weight, and programmability justify its slightly higher cost. Choose the Redragon Behemoth K724 Pro primarily if finding the absolute lowest price is the top priority, and you are comfortable without a specified polling rate.

AULA F75 Max

+Specifies a 1000Hz polling rate in both wireless and wired modes.
+Detailed sound package with IXPE pad, PET pad, and layered foams for a thocky sound.
+Ergonomic design with a 2cm low front height and 2-stage adjustable kickstand.
+Includes screw-in stabilizers and south-facing RGB LEDs.
+Lighter weight (960g) and more compact depth for easier portability.

−Priced slightly higher than the Redragon K724 Pro.
−Case material is listed as ABS plastic.
−Battery life claims are vendor-specific and not independently verified.

Redragon Behemoth K724 Pro

+Generally available at a lower price point than the AULA F75 Max.
+Vendor lists five specific sound-absorbing pads: PO foam, IXPE switch foam, PET pad, bottom socket foam, and silicone pad.
+Includes four spare switches in the box.
+OEM profile PBT keycaps are specified.

−No polling rate is specified in the provided metadata or description.
−Heavier at 1190g and has a much larger depth dimension.
−Case material is generically listed as 'Plastic' without further detail.

Which Keyboard Is Better for Your Needs?

The AULA F75 Max is the more versatile choice, winning in most categories due to its detailed ergonomic and acoustic design. It holds advantages for gaming, office work, programming, travel, and modding, largely due to its specified polling rate, battery details, flex-cut plate, lighter weight, and layered foam construction. The two keyboards tie for content creation, as both offer the core creative features of a TFT screen and control knob.

GamingAULA F75 Max

•The AULA F75 Max lists a 1000Hz polling rate for both wired and wireless modes.
•It includes N-Key Rollover (NKRO) and anti-ghosting, as stated by the manufacturer.
•Its lower front height of 2cm may offer a more comfortable wrist position during long sessions.

OfficeAULA F75 Max

•The AULA F75 Max has a specified 4000mAh battery with claimed runtimes of 30.5 hours (backlight on) and 80 hours (off).
•Its 2-stage adjustable kickstand and low front height are highlighted for ergonomic comfort.
•The vendor description emphasizes its suitability for long hours of work.

ProgrammingAULA F75 Max

•The AULA F75 Max features a flex-cut PC plate, which the vendor says adds bounce and comfort for long typing sessions.
•It has 80 programmable keys and supports key remapping and macro editing via software.
•South-facing RGB switches are listed, which can improve compatibility with Cherry-profile keycaps.

TravelAULA F75 Max

•The AULA F75 Max is lighter at 960g compared to the Redragon K724 Pro's 1190g.
•It has a more compact depth of 143mm versus the Redragon's 335mm.
•Its included 2.4G receiver has a dedicated storage slot on the keyboard body.

ModdingAULA F75 Max

•The AULA F75 Max details specific sound-dampening layers: IXPE pad, PET pad, and layered foams.
•It uses screw-in stabilizers, which are generally preferred for modding over clip-in types.
•The vendor lists compatibility with both 3-pin and 5-pin switches.

Content CreationTie

•Both keyboards feature a customizable TFT screen for displaying GIFs or system info.
•Both include a control knob for media and volume adjustments.
•Both offer tri-mode connectivity for flexible setup with multiple devices.