Shortcut Studio Bridge75 vs Epomaker TH4075% Layout or 40% Size
Choose the Bridge75 for its 75% layout and aluminum case, or the TH40 if its much smaller 40% footprint matters more.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
No reviews
from$85at MK
3.9 (56)3.9 · 56 reviews
from$55at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
Shortcut Studio Bridge75
Battery
Build quality in the top 20% of 75% boards under $100.
- Aluminum case with a brushed stainless steel weight.
- 75% ANSI layout with a function row and dedicated arrow-key area.
- 4000mAh battery and Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and USB-C wired connectivity.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- No numpad.
Get the
Epomaker TH40
Build quality in the top 30% of 40% boards under $150.
- Compact 40% layout with listed dimensions of 35 x 258 x 97 mm and a weight of 500g.
- Four switchable layers, with three fully programmable in VIA.
- Gasket mount with Poron plate foam, an IXPE switch pad, and bottom Poron foam.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Pick the Shortcut Studio Bridge75 if you want a more familiar 75% layout, an aluminum case, and a larger listed battery. Choose the Epomaker TH40 if portability and a 40% footprint outweigh the need for dedicated function and arrow keys. Both provide hot-swap support, QMK and VIA, and three connection modes.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Shortcut Studio Bridge75
Epomaker TH40
Layout size
75%
40%
Battery
4,000 mAh
3,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Ergonomics
Standard
Split Spacebar
Case material
Aluminum
ABS
Mount style
Plate Mount
Gasket Mount
- Shortcut Studio Bridge75
- Epomaker TH40
- Performance
- 7274
- Build quality
- 7975
- Productivity
- 8962
- Customizability
- 8385
- Portability
- 8184
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- QMK
- VIA
- Keycaps: PBT
What will you mostly use it for?
The Bridge75 is the more straightforward choice for office work, programming, and content creation if dedicated keys matter. The TH40 takes the travel category on its compact dimensions and listed weight. Gaming is a draw on the shared polling rate and rollover features, while both offer useful customization for modding. Consider the TH40's layered layout before choosing it as an everyday primary board.
It's a tie
- Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate and N-Key Rollover.
- Both support wired and 2.4 GHz connections, where the listed polling rate applies.
Shortcut Studio Bridge75 vs Epomaker TH40 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
9 of 23 specs differ
Shortcut Studio Bridge75
Epomaker TH40
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Shortcut Studio Bridge75 vs Epomaker TH40: your questions
The Bridge75 is a 75% ANSI keyboard with an aluminum case, while the TH40 is a 40% keyboard with an ABS case. The TH40 saves space, but its layout omits a function row and dedicated arrow keys.
The Bridge75 is the more direct fit if you want a function row and dedicated arrow keys on the keyboard. The TH40 supports VIA and QMK, but its compact layout uses layers for functions including arrows and the numpad.
The TH40 is a 40% keyboard measuring 35 x 258 x 97 mm and weighing 500g. It also supports Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz wireless, making it the more compact option compared with the 75% Bridge75.
Yes. Both list Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired USB-C connectivity.
The Bridge75 lists a 4000mAh battery, compared with 3000mAh for the TH40. These capacities alone do not establish how long either keyboard lasts between charges.
Yes, both are listed as hot-swappable. The Bridge75 has a flex-cut hot-swap PCB, and the TH40 specifies 3/5-pin hot-swap support.
Both keyboards list support for VIA and QMK. The TH40 also specifies four switchable layers, with three fully programmable in VIA.
The Bridge75 has an aluminum case and a brushed stainless steel weight. The TH40 uses an ABS plastic case.
The Bridge75 lists INOAC Poron foam, an IPXE sheet, and EPDM case foam. The TH40 lists Poron plate foam, an IXPE switch pad, and bottom Poron foam.
Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate and N-Key Rollover, and both support wired and 2.4 GHz connections. The TH40's vendor description specifies 1000 Hz for wired and 2.4 GHz modes, with 125 Hz over Bluetooth.
Both have south-facing LEDs, and their compatibility notes warn that shine-through legends stay dark. Those notes also caution that some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
No. Its compatibility notes specify that the compact layout has no dedicated arrow keys or numpad, and it also lacks a function row. The vendor describes using layers for additional functions.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.