DOIO KB64G 01 vs Wooting 60HE Plus
Get the DOIO KB64G 01 for knob and qmk. Get the Wooting 60HE Plus for hall effect.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Which one should you get?
Get the
Wooting 60HE Plus
Hall effect
Build quality in the top 50% of 60% boards under $150.
- Magnetic switches only. Standard MX switches will not fit.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
DOIO KB64G 01
Wooting 60HE Plus
Hall effect (magnetic)
No
Yes
Adjustable actuation helps in games and not in normal typing
Mount style
Gasket Mount
Tray Mount
Knob
Yes
No
Display
OLED
None
A case display rather than a typing feature
QMK
Yes
No
The deep option when you want to remap every key
- DOIO KB64G 01
- Wooting 60HE Plus
- Performance
- 6951
- Build quality
- 8761
- Productivity
- 8956
- Customizability
- 9650
- Portability
- 7470
- Layout size: 60%
- Connection: Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Plate material: Polycarbonate
DOIO KB64G 01 vs Wooting 60HE Plus specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
11 of 22 specs differ
DOIO KB64G 01
Wooting 60HE Plus
Switch options
Hall effect (magnetic)
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
QMK
VIA
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.











![[In-Stock] Flux60 HE(Babao 60 HE)Module](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0607/2474/0287/files/WechatIMG4298.png?v=1768195930&width=3840&quality=75)

