Which one should you get?
Get the
AULA F75
Budget Sound
- Lighter weight at 1023g for easier portability.
- Includes rapid trigger functionality for gaming.
- Features screw-in stabilizers for potentially better tuning.
- Case material is listed as a combination of plastic and aluminum, not full aluminum.
- Vendor notes that software support is for Windows only.
- Includes fewer accessories in the box (only lists a basic puller and cable).
Get the
Epomaker Galaxy70
Premium Build
- Constructed with a full powder-coated aluminum case for a premium, durable feel.
- Vendor provides specific latency figures for wired (2.8ms), 2.4GHz (5ms), and Bluetooth (22ms) modes.
- Lists a polypropylene plate with flex cuts, aimed at producing a deeper, 'thocky' sound.
- Substantially heavier at 1790g, which is less portable.
- Uses plate-mount stabilizers instead of screw-in.
- The vendor listing mentions fewer internal foam layers by name compared to the F75 description.
Your budget and priority for material feel are the deciding factors. The AULA F75 delivers exceptional value with gaming-focused features, detailed sound dampening, and a lighter build. The Epomaker Galaxy70 justifies its higher cost with a solid, all-aluminum construction and published low-latency numbers, catering to users who prefer a heavyweight, premium keyboard on their desk.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
AULA F75
Epomaker Galaxy70
Case material
Plastic
Aluminum
Weight
1,023 g
1,790 g
Keycaps
ABS, PBT
PBT
Screw-in stabilizers
Yes
No
Media keys
Yes
No
- AULA F75
- Epomaker Galaxy70
- Performance
- 6478
- Build quality
- 6672
- Productivity
- 9273
- Customizability
- 8265
- Portability
- 8275
- Layout size: 75%
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Battery: 4,000 mAh
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
What will you mostly use it for?
The AULA F75 takes the lead for gaming, programming, travel, and modding due to its lighter weight, rapid trigger feature, screw-in stabilizers, and detailed sound-dampening construction. The keyboards tie for office use and content creation, sharing core productivity features like tri-mode connectivity and a control knob. The Galaxy70's primary advantage is its durable, powder-coated all-aluminum case, which appeals to users seeking a premium, heavy-duty feel.
Pick the AULA F75
- The AULA F75 lists rapid trigger as a specific feature, which can be beneficial for competitive gaming.
- Both have a 1000 Hz polling rate, but the F75's lighter weight (1023g vs 1790g) may be preferable for quick desk movements.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
AULA F75
509 owner reviews
“Works exactly as intended and still works as new. The 2.4 GHz Receiver doesn't communicate correctly and isn't reliable but on BT and Cable it works perfectly”
“I made an order for EPOMAKER x AULA 75 with express shipping on 27/1/24. Emailed the team TWICE. Now its 19/3/24, and i still dont have the item. Very poor service”
Epomaker Galaxy70
100 owner reviews
“The Galaxy70 is super thocky with the zebra switches. Great choice if that's the sound profile you're looking for! The alu case is super heavy and well built.”
“so I bought this keyboard, I was essentially really excited about it. looked good, nice price and from a company I trusted. The keyboard arrived, I plugged it in, and it didn't respond properly.The software could not be detected by my PC for whatever reason…”
AULA F75 vs Epomaker Galaxy70 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
8 of 25 specs differ
AULA F75
Epomaker Galaxy70
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
AULA F75 vs Epomaker Galaxy70: your questions
Both aim for a pleasant typing sound with gasket mounts and dampening. The AULA F75's vendor description specifies a five-layer design with Poron foam, IXPE switch pad, PET pad, and silicone. The Galaxy70's listing mentions a polypropylene plate for a deep, 'thocky' sound and lists materials like PORON foam and PET pads. The final sound depends on the included switches and keycaps.
The Epomaker Galaxy70's product page lists specific latency numbers: 2.8ms wired, 5ms on 2.4GHz wireless, and 22ms on Bluetooth. The AULA F75 listing does not provide specific latency figures, only stating it has an 'ultra-responsive low-latency' connection. Both share a 1000 Hz polling rate for wired and 2.4GHz modes.
Yes. Both keyboards use Cherry-profile PBT keycaps according to their listings. The AULA F75 uses double-shot PBT, while the Galaxy70 offers double-shot or dye-sublimated PBT depending on the color. Cherry-profile keycaps are widely compatible with most MX-style switches.
Yes. Both the AULA F75 and Epomaker Galaxy70 list Mac/Win support in their extra features. This means they should be plug-and-play compatible with macOS, though specific software for customization may be limited to Windows.
The vendor description for the AULA F75 shows a variant with 'LEOBOG Reaper Switch.' The keyboard's metadata also lists silent and linear as its switch types. As it is hot-swappable, you can easily replace them with any compatible 3-pin or 5-pin MX-style switches.
The Epomaker Galaxy70 has a 4000mAh battery, the same capacity as the AULA F75. The vendor states this ensures 'prolonged performance' for extended sessions. Actual battery life will depend on usage patterns, RGB brightness, and the chosen connection mode.
The AULA F75 may have a slight edge for beginners interested in modding. Its vendor description explicitly details its internal foam layers, and it comes with screw-in stabilizers which are often easier to tune and modify than the plate-mount stabilizers listed for the Galaxy70. Both are fully hot-swappable.
The Epomaker Galaxy70 vendor description specifically lists 'BT5.0' as part of its triple-mode connectivity. The AULA F75 listing only states 'Bluetooth' without specifying a version, so its Bluetooth version cannot be confirmed from the provided information.
According to its vendor page, the Epomaker Galaxy70 comes with the keyboard, a manual, and a Type-C cable. The AULA F75 listing includes a few more items: the keyboard, a 2.4G dongle, a Type-C cable, a 2-in-1 keycap/switch puller, and a user manual.
Both keyboards feature south-facing RGB LEDs, which prevents interference with Cherry-profile keycaps. The AULA F75 listing notes an exception: its side-printed keycap versions have south-facing LEDs, while other keycap sets for the F75 use north-facing LEDs.
The Epomaker Galaxy70 has a listed typing angle of 7 degrees. The AULA F75 does not have a typing angle specified in its metadata or vendor description, so a direct comparison cannot be made.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.











![[In Stock] Xinmeng M75/M75Pro 75% Pre-Built Mechanical Keyboard](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0549/0262/0278/files/O1CN01QqPe0g1sgA8RTJI6B___2215624025795.png?v=1741766474&width=3840&quality=75)
