AULA F75 vs Epomaker RT82Rapid Trigger vs LCD Screen
Choose the AULA F75 for competitive gaming features or the Epomaker RT82 for unique screen-based customization.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
4.5 (510)4.5 · 510 reviews
from$42at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
4.6 (41)4.6 · 41 reviews
from$60at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
AULA F75
Rapid Trigger
Build quality in the bottom 35% of 75% boards under $50.
- Includes a rapid trigger feature for gaming performance.
- Features a multimedia control knob for media adjustments.
- Uses screw-in stabilizers, which are often preferred for modding.
- North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Get the
Epomaker RT82
LCD Screen
Build quality in the top 30% of 75% boards under $100.
- Features a magnetically detachable 1.14-inch LCD screen for custom GIFs and info.
- Offers VIA support for easy, firmware-based key remapping.
- Includes a two-stage adjustable kickstand for three typing angles.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Select the AULA F75 if your focus is on gaming responsiveness and you value a media knob. Opt for the Epomaker RT82 if you want a unique customizable screen, extensive VIA software support, and adjustable ergonomics. Both are competent tri-mode keyboards, so let your need for either rapid trigger or a mini-display guide your final decision.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
AULA F75
Epomaker RT82
Case material
Plastic
ABS
Knob
Yes
No
Display
None
LCD
A case display rather than a typing feature
Weight
1,023 g
1,000 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
VIA
No
Yes
GUI remapping without compiling firmware
- AULA F75
- Epomaker RT82
- Performance
- 6378
- Build quality
- 6674
- Productivity
- 9382
- Customizability
- 8277
- Portability
- 8379
- Layout size: 75%
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Battery: 4,000 mAh
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Switch options: Linear, Silent
What will you mostly use it for?
The Epomaker RT82 takes the lead for office and programming use due to its VIA software and adjustable screen. The AULA F75 is the stronger choice for gaming and content creation, thanks to rapid trigger and a media knob. For travel and modding, the keyboards are evenly matched, sharing core wireless and customization features. Your primary task will dictate the winner.
Pick the AULA F75
- Includes a rapid trigger feature for faster actuation.
- Screw-in stabilizers may offer more tuning stability than the RT82's plate-mounted ones.
- Vendor description mentions ultra-responsive, low-latency connection.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
AULA F75
510 owner reviews
“Works exactly as intended and still works as new. The 2.4 GHz Receiver doesn't communicate correctly and isn't reliable but on BT and Cable it works perfectly”
“I made an order for EPOMAKER x AULA 75 with express shipping on 27/1/24. Emailed the team TWICE. Now its 19/3/24, and i still dont have the item. Very poor service”
Epomaker RT82
41 owner reviews
“I love the sound, the keyboard was shipped fast, but i have found some of the keys have input issues at times where it doesn't register the key being pushed”
“I received an informative sms two months ago that the keyboard is arriving, It has still not arrived.”
AULA F75 vs Epomaker RT82 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
10 of 26 specs differ
AULA F75
Epomaker RT82
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
AULA F75 vs Epomaker RT82: your questions
The AULA F75 is the stronger choice for competitive gaming. It specifically includes a rapid trigger feature, which is designed for faster actuation in games. The F75 also uses screw-in stabilizers, which can be tuned for less rattle during intense gameplay.
Yes, the Epomaker RT82's 1.14-inch LCD screen is detachable and functions wirelessly. The vendor states it can display saved GIFs, the time, date, and keyboard battery level. It is powered by the keyboard's internal 4000mAh battery.
The Epomaker RT82 supports VIA, a popular and easy-to-use firmware for extensive key remapping and macro creation. The AULA F75 uses proprietary Windows software for customization, but the vendor description does not mention VIA support for this model.
Both have a 4000mAh battery. The Epomaker RT82 vendor provides specific estimates: up to 115 hours with RGB and screen off, but only 14 hours with both on. The AULA F75 vendor description notes extended usage but does not provide specific hour estimates.
Yes, both the AULA F75 and Epomaker RT82 list Mac support in their specifications. The RT82 even includes three additional keycaps for Mac in the box. Both offer Bluetooth connectivity for easy pairing with macOS devices.
Both keyboards feature multi-layer foam for sound dampening. The AULA F75 uses a five-layer design with Poron foam, IXPE, PET, and silicone. The RT82 also uses a five-layer system with sandwich latex, IXPE, PET, foam, and silicone. The actual sound profile will also depend on their different plate materials.
Yes, both the AULA F75 and Epomaker RT82 are hot-swappable. They support both 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches, allowing you to easily change switches without soldering.
The AULA F75 lists its case material as plastic and aluminum. The Epomaker RT82 uses an ABS plastic case with a polycarbonate (PC) plate. The F75 may offer a more premium feel due to the aluminum mention, while the RT82's PC plate can influence its typing sound.
Yes. The Epomaker RT82 has a built-in two-stage kickstand offering 5, 7.5, and 11-degree angles. The AULA F75 has a fixed typing angle, which is listed as a normal layout in its specifications without mention of an adjustable stand.
The Epomaker RT82 includes a more unique accessory set. It comes with the detachable mini TV screen, two additional switches, and three Mac keycaps. The AULA F75 includes the standard cable, dongle, puller, and manual.
Both use Cherry profile, double-shot PBT keycaps, which are durable and resist shine. The printing technique differs slightly. The RT82 uses dye-sublimation, while the F75 uses double-shot molding for its legends.
According to the Epomaker RT82 technical specifications, its latency is 5ms in 2.4GHz wireless mode and 15ms in Bluetooth mode. The AULA F75 vendor description mentions low latency but does not provide specific millisecond values.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.