AULA F75 vs Epomaker TH108Compact 75% vs Full-Size Showdown
Choose the AULA F75 for a compact, feature-rich desk, or the Epomaker TH108 for a dedicated full-size layout with superior battery life.
Which one should you get?
Get the
AULA F75
Compact 75%
- Compact 75% layout saves significant desk space.
- Includes a multimedia control knob for quick adjustments.
- Features screw-in stabilizers and a detailed five-layer sound dampening system.
- Smaller 4000mAh battery offers less wireless runtime.
- Lacks a dedicated number pad.
- No adjustable kickstand for typing angle, relying on a fixed design.
Get the
Epomaker TH108
Full-Size Showdown
- Full 100% layout with a dedicated number pad.
- Massive 8000mAh battery (vendor claims 10000mAh) for extended wireless use.
- Includes a two-stage adjustable kickstand for ergonomic positioning.
- Larger and heavier footprint (445mm long, 1200g) is less portable.
- Uses plate-mounted stabilizers, which are less favored for modding than screw-in types.
- Case is constructed from thick ABS plastic without an aluminum option.
Your primary need dictates the winner. If you want to maximize desk space, value a control knob, and plan to mod, the AULA F75 is the more versatile and compact choice. If you require a number pad daily, prioritize marathon wireless battery life, and will keep the keyboard in one place, the Epomaker TH108 is the dedicated workhorse. Both deliver a gasket-mounted typing experience at a similar price point.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
AULA F75
Epomaker TH108
Layout size
75%
100%
Battery
4,000 mAh
8,000 mAh
Case material
Plastic
ABS
Knob
Yes
No
Weight
1,023 g
1,200 g
- AULA F75
- Epomaker TH108
- Performance
- 6475
- Build quality
- 6660
- Productivity
- 9277
- Customizability
- 8259
- Portability
- 8263
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Switch options: Linear, Silent
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The AULA F75 wins in scenarios where space efficiency, gaming features, and portability are key. The Epomaker TH108 is the clear choice for office and data-entry work due to its full layout and massive battery. For programming and general typing, the decision is a toss-up based on layout preference, as both share core quality-of-life features like hot-swap sockets and PBT keycaps.
Pick the AULA F75
- The AULA F75 includes a rapid trigger feature for faster actuation.
- Its 75% layout frees up more mousepad space for low-sensitivity gaming.
- It offers a 1000 Hz polling rate in wireless mode, matching the TH108's wired performance.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
AULA F75
509 owner reviews
“Works exactly as intended and still works as new. The 2.4 GHz Receiver doesn't communicate correctly and isn't reliable but on BT and Cable it works perfectly”
“I made an order for EPOMAKER x AULA 75 with express shipping on 27/1/24. Emailed the team TWICE. Now its 19/3/24, and i still dont have the item. Very poor service”
Epomaker TH108
47 owner reviews
“My first mechanical keyboard. A lot of people like the clack of some keyboards. I prefer the silent switches. This keyboard is great and works very well.”
“Its very cool, I just wish I had picked the silent switch version instead. :/”
AULA F75 vs Epomaker TH108 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
10 of 25 specs differ
AULA F75
Epomaker TH108
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
AULA F75 vs Epomaker TH108: your questions
The Epomaker TH108 has a significantly larger battery. Its specifications list an 8000mAh battery, and the vendor description claims up to 10000mAh and 160 hours of use. The AULA F75 uses a 4000mAh battery, offering less wireless runtime between charges.
No, the AULA F75 is a 75% layout keyboard. It omits the dedicated number pad and function row to achieve its compact size, focusing on the alphanumeric keys, arrows, and a column of navigation keys.
Yes, both the AULA F75 and Epomaker TH108 feature hot-swappable PCBs. This allows you to easily replace the mechanical switches without soldering, using compatible 5-pin switches.
The AULA F75 is better for small desks. It measures 323mm in length, which is over 120mm (nearly 5 inches) shorter than the 445mm long Epomaker TH108. This compact 75% layout frees up considerable space for your mouse.
Yes, both keyboards list Mac and Windows support in their specifications. They should be compatible with both operating systems, though specific software drivers mentioned may be for Windows only.
Both keyboards support a 1000 Hz polling rate. The AULA F75 vendor page states it has an ultra-responsive low-latency connection. The Epomaker TH108 specifications confirm a 1000 Hz polling rate in both USB and 2.4GHz wireless modes.
The AULA F75 uses screw-in stabilizers, which are typically more secure and easier to tune. The Epomaker TH108 uses plate-mounted stabilizers, and its specifications note it is not compatible with PCB or screw-in stabilizers.
Only the AULA F75 includes a dedicated multimedia control knob. The Epomaker TH108 does not have a knob; media controls would need to be accessed through function key combinations.
The keycaps are double-shot PBT, which are durable, but shine-through is not explicitly guaranteed. The Epomaker TH108 has south-facing LEDs, which can cause interference with some Cherry-profile keycaps but won't illuminate front-printed legends. The AULA F75 offers both north and south-facing LED options depending on the keycap version.
According to the vendor, the Epomaker TH108 box includes the keyboard, a 2.4GHz receiver, a USB A to C cable, a 2-in-1 keycap/switch puller, two extra switches, and a manual.
The AULA F75 uses a standard 75% layout, so most keycap sets will fit. Its vendor notes that side-printed keycap versions have south-facing LEDs, while others have north-facing LEDs, which affects compatibility with certain sculpted keycap profiles.
The Epomaker TH108 vendor provides specific latency numbers: 2ms (USB), 5ms (2.4GHz), and 11ms (Bluetooth). The AULA F75 vendor claims "ultra-responsive, low-latency" but does not provide specific millisecond values, making a direct numerical comparison impossible from the provided information.
Not sold on either?
![[In Stock] Xinmeng M75/M75Pro 75% Pre-Built Mechanical Keyboard](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0549/0262/0278/files/O1CN01QqPe0g1sgA8RTJI6B___2215624025795.png?v=1741766474&width=3840&quality=75)
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.