AULA F75 vs Epomaker TH108Compact vs Full-Size
Choose the AULA F75 for a space-saving 75% layout with a media knob, or the Epomaker TH108 for a full-size layout, larger battery, and five-layer sound padding.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
4.5 (510)4.5 · 510 reviews
from$42at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
4.6 (49)4.6 · 49 reviews
from$71at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
AULA F75
Compact
Build quality in the top 30% of 75% boards under $50.
- 75% layout with media keys and knob support.
- Screw-in stabilizers.
- Listed weight of 1023 g and length of 323 mm.
- North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- No numpad.
Get the
Epomaker TH108
Full-Size
Build quality in the top 50% of 100% boards under $100.
- Full-size 100% layout with a number pad.
- 8000mAh battery.
- Five named sound-dampening layers, including PORON sandwich foam and bottom silicone.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Get the AULA F75 for a smaller 75% board with media controls, screw-in stabilizers, and a listed 323 mm length. Choose the Epomaker TH108 for a number pad, a larger 8000mAh battery, and five specifically named sound-dampening layers.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
AULA F75
Epomaker TH108
Layout size
75%
100%
Battery
4,000 mAh
8,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Case material
Plastic
ABS
Knob
Yes
No
Weight
1,023 g
1,200 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
- AULA F75
- Epomaker TH108
- Performance
- 8174
- Build quality
- 7659
- Productivity
- 9376
- Customizability
- 8258
- Portability
- 8363
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Switch options: Linear, Silent
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The F75 edges ahead for gaming and travel on its compact footprint, while the TH108 is the office-oriented pick when a number pad matters. Programming is a close call, with layout preference and the TH108's layered sound padding determining the fit. For modding, the TH108's named switch compatibility and included tools stand out, while the F75's screw-in stabilizers may appeal to a different kind of customization. The F75's media controls make it a natural fit for content work that benefits from quick playback adjustments.
Pick the AULA F75
- Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate and N-key rollover.
- The F75 has a compact 75% layout and a vendor-described work/game mode toggle.
- The TH108 offers a full-size layout for players who want a number pad.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
AULA F75
510 owner reviews
“Works exactly as intended and still works as new. The 2.4 GHz Receiver doesn't communicate correctly and isn't reliable but on BT and Cable it works perfectly”
“I made an order for EPOMAKER x AULA 75 with express shipping on 27/1/24. Emailed the team TWICE. Now its 19/3/24, and i still dont have the item. Very poor service”
Epomaker TH108
49 owner reviews
“My first mechanical keyboard. A lot of people like the clack of some keyboards. I prefer the silent switches. This keyboard is great and works very well.”
“Its very cool, I just wish I had picked the silent switch version instead. :/”
AULA F75 vs Epomaker TH108 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
10 of 25 specs differ
AULA F75
Epomaker TH108
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
AULA F75 vs Epomaker TH108: your questions
Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate and N-key rollover, so those specs do not distinguish them. The F75 is the compact option and its vendor description mentions a work/game mode toggle; the TH108 has a full-size layout.
Yes. The TH108 is listed as a 100% full-size keyboard with 108 keys, making it the choice here for buyers who want a number pad.
Yes. The F75 is listed at 323 mm long and has a 75% layout, while the TH108 is 445 mm long and full-size.
The Epomaker TH108 lists an 8000mAh battery, while the AULA F75 lists 4000mAh. The TH108 is the option with the larger stated battery capacity.
Both product listings identify the keyboards as hot-swappable. The TH108 vendor description specifically says its hot-swap PCB supports 5-pin mechanical switches.
The TH108 vendor description names five layers: PORON sandwich foam, an IXPE switch pad, Sound-Enhancement PET, PORON switch socket foam, and bottom silicone. The F75 is listed with sound dampening, but its supplied description does not specify layers.
The F75 lists knob support and multimedia keys, and its vendor description says the knob can control volume or media playback. The TH108's listed extra features do not include a knob.
Both list Cherry-profile keycaps, but their south-facing LEDs can leave shine-through legends dark or interfere with some sculpted keycaps. The F75 also has north-facing LEDs, which its compatibility notes say can hit Cherry-profile keycaps.
The F75 is shorter and lighter, measuring 323 mm and weighing 1023 g. The TH108 is 445 mm long and weighs 1200 g, though it lists the larger 8000mAh battery.
Both metadata listings include Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz connectivity as well as wired use. The TH108 vendor description also describes switching between cable, 2.4 GHz, and Bluetooth modes.
It depends on whether you prefer a compact layout or a number pad. Both have ANSI layouts and hot-swappable switches, while the TH108 adds five named sound-dampening layers and the F75 includes media controls.
The vendor lists a 2.4 GHz receiver, USB-A-to-C cable, keycap-and-switch puller, two extra switches, and a multilingual manual in the box. The F75 vendor listing names a keyboard, manual, and Type-C cable.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.