Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Oct 21, 2026

AULA F75 vs Machenike K500Wireless Gasket vs Wired 96% Layout

Choose the AULA F75 for its versatile wireless connectivity and premium typing feel, or the Machenike K500 for a basic, wired 96% layout at a lower cost.

EPOMAKER x AULA F75

Wireless Gasket

AULA F75

4.5 · 509 reviews

from$49at Epomaker

Shop nowCompare 2 stores

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

AULA F75

Wireless Gasket

If you want

  • Offers three-way connectivity: Bluetooth, 2.4GHz wireless, and wired USB-C.
  • Features a gasket mount structure with a five-layer sound-dampening design including Poron foam and a silicone pad.
  • Includes a multimedia control knob and pre-lubricated switches for a premium out-of-box experience.

And can live with

  • At 1023g, it is significantly heavier than the K500, which may affect portability.
  • The 75% layout lacks a dedicated number pad, which some users require.
  • Software support is listed for Windows only, which may limit customization for Mac users.

Get the

Machenike K500

Wired 96% Layout

If you want

  • More affordable price point for a hot-swappable mechanical keyboard.
  • 96% layout provides a dedicated number pad in a relatively compact form factor.
  • Includes EVA plate sound-absorbing foam according to the vendor description.

And can live with

  • Wired-only connectivity lacks the flexibility of wireless options.
  • Uses an ABS case and an unspecified plate foam, which may feel less premium than the F75's materials.
  • No vendor information on Mac compatibility, listing only Windows support.

Bottom line

The AULA F75 is the clear choice if you value wireless connectivity, a premium typing feel with sound dampening, and extra features like a control knob. Its higher cost is justified by its broader versatility. The Machenike K500 is a suitable budget option if you need a wired keyboard with a number pad and basic hot-swap functionality, and are willing to forgo advanced build features and wireless connectivity.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

AULA F75

Machenike K500

  • Layout size

    75%

    96%

  • Connection

    Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

    Wired

  • Case material

    Plastic

    ABS

  • Switch options

    Linear, Silent

    Linear, Tactile

  • Knob

    Yes

    No

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • AULA F75
  • Machenike K500
Performance
64
81
Build quality
66
55
Productivity
92
62
Customizability
82
65
Portability
82
46

What they share

  • Hot-swappable
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The AULA F75 is the more versatile choice, winning for gaming, travel, modding, and content creation due to its wireless options, gasket mount, and multimedia knob. The Machenike K500 takes the office category because its 96% layout includes a number pad, a critical feature for many office tasks. For programming, both layouts are competent, making it a tie based on personal layout preference.

For gaming

Pick the AULA F75

  • The AULA F75 offers a 1000Hz polling rate and a low-latency wireless connection for responsive gameplay.
  • Its gasket mount and multi-layer foam padding can provide a more stable, dampened typing experience.
  • The vendor description mentions a rapid trigger feature, which can be advantageous for competitive gaming.

From real owners

What owners say

Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.

AULA F75

4.5

509 owner reviews

Praise
“Works exactly as intended and still works as new. The 2.4 GHz Receiver doesn't communicate correctly and isn't reliable but on BT and Cable it works perfectly”
MegaNoobyYTVerified buyer· via Epomaker
Critique
“I made an order for EPOMAKER x AULA 75 with express shipping on 27/1/24. Emailed the team TWICE. Now its 19/3/24, and i still dont have the item. Very poor service”
Faisal A.Verified buyer· via Epomaker

Machenike K500

No owner reviews collected yet.

Full specs

AULA F75 vs Machenike K500 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

13 of 24 specs differ

AULA F75

Machenike K500

Typing & switches

Switch options

Linear, Silent
Linear, Tactile

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
—

Sound dampening

Yes
No

Screw-in stabilizers

Yes
No

Layout

Layout size

75%
96%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Knob

Yes
No

Display

None
None

Media keys

Yes
No

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Wired

Max polling rate

1,000 Hz
—

Battery

4,000 mAh
Wired only

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Plastic
ABS

Plate material

—
Steel

Keycaps

ABS, PBT
PBT

Weight

1,023 g
650 g

Dimensions

43 x 143 x 323 mm
34 x 127 x 353 mm

Backlight

RGB, south-facing
RGB

Firmware & software

N-key rollover

Yes
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
No

Extras

Released

2023
2023

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

AULA F755 stores
  • EpomakerUS

    In stock
    $49Visit
  • VelocifireCN

    In stock
    $66Visit
  • AmazonGlobal

    Check price
    Visit
  • WhatGeekCN

    Out of stock
    $67Visit
  • AmazonGlobal

    Check price
    ~$39Visit
  • WhatGeekCN

    Out of stock
    $39Visit

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

FAQ

AULA F75 vs Machenike K500: your questions

Only the AULA F75 offers wireless connectivity. It supports Bluetooth, 2.4GHz, and wired USB-C. The Machenike K500 is a wired-only keyboard with a USB-C connection.

Yes. The Machenike K500 uses a 96% layout, which incorporates a number pad into a compact design. The AULA F75 uses a 75% layout and does not have a dedicated number pad.

Yes, both the AULA F75 and Machenike K500 are hot-swappable. The K500 vendor page states it is compatible with 3-pin switches like Cherry, TTC, and Outemu.

A gasket mount uses rubber or silicone gaskets to suspend the plate and PCB, reducing harsh vibrations and noise. The AULA F75 features a gasket mount structure. The Machenike K500 does not have a gasket mount.

The AULA F75 is likely better for quiet offices. It offers silent linear switch options and has a multi-layer sound-dampening design with Poron foam and a silicone pad to reduce typing noise. The K500's acoustic properties are less detailed.

The AULA F75 is equipped with a 4000mAh rechargeable lithium battery. The vendor description states it provides extended usage times, but the exact battery life in hours will depend on usage patterns and RGB lighting settings.

Yes, both keyboards use PBT keycaps. The AULA F75 specifically uses Cherry-profile double-shot PBT keycaps, while the Machenike K500 uses OEM-profile PBT keycaps.

Both keyboards have software available for download, but with potential limitations. The AULA F75 software is listed as supporting Windows systems. The Machenike K500 software driver is also listed for Windows.

The AULA F75 lists Mac/Win support in its metadata. However, its customization software is noted to support Windows only, so advanced RGB and key programming may be limited on macOS.

The AULA F75 uses a combination of plastic and aluminum for its case. The Machenike K500 uses an ABS plastic case with a steel (iron) plate inside, according to its vendor specifications.

Yes. The AULA F75 includes an integrated multimedia control knob, as confirmed in the vendor description. The Machenike K500 does not have a knob.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.