Which one should you get?
Get the
AULA F75
Gaming Performance
- Includes gaming-specific features: 1000Hz polling rate and Rapid Trigger.
- Detailed five-layer sound dampening with Poron foam, IXPE, PET, and silicone.
- Dual-material case construction (plastic and aluminum).
- Heavier at 1023g, making it less portable.
- Smaller 4000mAh battery compared to the K75.
- Vendor software is noted to support Windows only.
Get the
Monka K75
Battery Life
- Larger 5000mAh battery with claimed long battery life.
- Lighter weight of 860g for easier portability.
- Includes two-stage adjustable feet for typing angle customization.
- Lacks specific gaming features like a stated polling rate or Rapid Trigger.
- All-plastic case construction.
- No user reviews are available to gauge real-world experience.
For most users, especially gamers and those who value a proven, mod-friendly build, the AULA F75 is the more compelling option. Its concrete gaming specs, sophisticated internal padding, and dual-material case justify its slightly higher weight. Only choose the Monka K75 if your primary need is maximizing wireless runtime from a larger battery and you are willing to forgo some performance-oriented features.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
AULA F75
Monka K75
Battery
4,000 mAh
5,000 mAh
Switch options
Linear, Silent
Linear, Tactile
Weight
1,023 g
860 g
Keycaps
ABS, PBT
PBT
Screw-in stabilizers
Yes
No
- AULA F75
- Monka K75
- Performance
- 6451
- Build quality
- 6650
- Productivity
- 9283
- Customizability
- 8266
- Portability
- 8279
- Layout size: 75%
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Case material: Plastic
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Knob
What will you mostly use it for?
The AULA F75 is the clear choice for gaming and holds an edge for programming due to its detailed acoustic design. The Monka K75 wins for travel based on its lower weight and larger battery capacity. For office use and content creation, the keyboards are evenly matched on core features like connectivity and the media knob. Modders will find more to work with in the F75's layered construction.
Pick the AULA F75
- The AULA F75 has a specified 1000Hz polling rate, which the Monka K75 listing does not mention.
- The AULA F75 includes Rapid Trigger functionality, a feature absent from the Monka K75's listed specs.
- The AULA F75 vendor description mentions an 'ultra-responsive, low-latency connection' for gaming.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
AULA F75
509 owner reviews
“Works exactly as intended and still works as new. The 2.4 GHz Receiver doesn't communicate correctly and isn't reliable but on BT and Cable it works perfectly”
“I made an order for EPOMAKER x AULA 75 with express shipping on 27/1/24. Emailed the team TWICE. Now its 19/3/24, and i still dont have the item. Very poor service”
Monka K75
No owner reviews collected yet.
AULA F75 vs Monka K75 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
10 of 23 specs differ
AULA F75
Monka K75
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
AULA F75 vs Monka K75: your questions
The AULA F75 is better suited for competitive gaming. Its specifications include a 1000Hz polling rate and Rapid Trigger functionality, which are critical for minimizing input delay. The Monka K75 product listing does not mention these gaming-specific features.
There is no evidence the Monka K75 has a higher polling rate. The AULA F75 is explicitly listed with a 1000Hz polling rate. The Monka K75 vendor description does not specify a polling rate, so it cannot be assumed to match or exceed the F75's.
The Monka K75 has a larger 5000mAh battery compared to the AULA F75's 4000mAh battery. The Monka vendor claims up to 15 days of use with the backlight off. While the F75's battery is substantial, the K75's higher capacity suggests longer potential runtime.
Both keyboards use PBT keycaps, but the AULA F75's are specifically described as Cherry-profile double-shot PBT by its vendor. The Monka K75 uses dual-tone injection-molded PBT keycaps. Double-shot molding typically offers better legend durability over time compared to other methods.
Yes, both keyboards feature full-key hot-swappable sockets. This allows you to easily change the mechanical switches without soldering, using a switch puller. Both boards are compatible with standard 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches.
The AULA F75 likely has a quieter, more refined typing sound. Its vendor details a comprehensive five-layer sound package including two Poron foam layers, an IXPE switch pad, a PET sound enhancement pad, and a silicone bottom pad. The Monka K75 also has padding, but its description is less specific.
Yes, both the AULA F75 and Monka K75 product listings include Mac/Win support. They should be compatible with macOS systems over USB-C wired, Bluetooth, or 2.4GHz wireless connections.
The AULA F75 weighs 1023 grams, making it noticeably heavier than the Monka K75 at 860 grams. This 163-gram difference makes the Monka K75 the more portable option if you plan to move the keyboard frequently.
The AULA F75 is listed with silent and linear switch types, and a vendor example shows Leobog Reaper switches. The Monka K75 offers tactile and linear options, with a vendor example being the Monka Sea Salt V2 tactile switch. Both are pre-lubricated from the factory.
The Monka K75 vendor listing specifies 19 different lighting effects. The AULA F75 vendor description mentions a 'spectrum of 16.8 million colors' and customizable patterns but does not specify a number of preset effects. Both have vibrant RGB backlighting.
The AULA F75 has downloadable software from its vendor, but it is noted to support Windows systems only. The Monka K75 listing mentions 'custom driver integration for RGB and macro key adjustment,' but does not specify OS compatibility. Always check the manufacturer's website for the latest software details.
The AULA F75 is a safer recommendation for a first-time buyer. It has a substantial number of positive user reviews, giving confidence in its quality and performance. The Monka K75 lacks any user reviews, making its real-world performance and reliability less certain.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.













![[In Stock] Xinmeng M75/M75Pro 75% Pre-Built Mechanical Keyboard](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0549/0262/0278/files/O1CN01QqPe0g1sgA8RTJI6B___2215624025795.png?v=1741766474&width=3840&quality=75)
