Which one should you get?
Get the
AULA F75
Compact Gasket
- Includes a multimedia control knob for quick media adjustments.
- Features a five-layer sound dampening design with Poron foam, IXPE switch pad, PET pad, and silicone.
- Offers rapid trigger functionality for gaming.
- Smaller 4000mAh battery compared to the M3W.
- Case material is a combination of plastic and aluminum, not full aluminum.
- No evidence of included extra modding materials like foam or pads.
Get the
Monsgeek M3W
Heavy TKL
- Larger 6000mAh battery capacity.
- Full aluminum case construction.
- Includes extra modding materials: Teflon pads, extra tape, and 3mm Poron foam.
- Much heavier at 2000g, less portable.
- Lacks a multimedia control knob.
- Mount style is plate mount, not gasket mount.
Select the AULA F75 if you want a feature-rich, compact keyboard with a knob, rapid trigger, and a lighter build for gaming or a crowded desk. Opt for the Monsgeek M3W if you prefer a heavier, all-aluminum TKL with a massive battery and appreciate the included materials for immediate modding and tuning. The F75 is ready to use out of the box with more gamer-centric features, while the M3W is a sturdier platform for enthusiasts who like to tinker.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
AULA F75
Monsgeek M3W
Layout size
75%
80%
Battery
4,000 mAh
6,000 mAh
Case material
Plastic
Aluminum
Switch options
Linear, Silent
Clicky, Linear
Mount style
Gasket Mount
Plate Mount
- AULA F75
- Monsgeek M3W
- Performance
- 6460
- Build quality
- 6667
- Productivity
- 9288
- Customizability
- 8279
- Portability
- 8287
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The AULA F75 wins for gaming, travel, and content creation due to its rapid trigger, lighter weight, and multimedia knob. The Monsgeek M3W is better suited for office use, programming, and modding, thanks to its larger battery, TKL layout, and included tuning materials. Your primary activity will strongly guide the choice between these two capable wireless boards.
Pick the AULA F75
- Includes a 1000 Hz polling rate for potentially lower latency.
- Features rapid trigger functionality for faster keypress registration.
- Lighter weight at 1023g may allow for easier repositioning.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
AULA F75
509 owner reviews
“Works exactly as intended and still works as new. The 2.4 GHz Receiver doesn't communicate correctly and isn't reliable but on BT and Cable it works perfectly”
“I made an order for EPOMAKER x AULA 75 with express shipping on 27/1/24. Emailed the team TWICE. Now its 19/3/24, and i still dont have the item. Very poor service”
Monsgeek M3W
No owner reviews collected yet.
AULA F75 vs Monsgeek M3W specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
11 of 24 specs differ
AULA F75
Monsgeek M3W
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
AULA F75 vs Monsgeek M3W: your questions
The Monsgeek M3W has a larger 6000mAh battery compared to the AULA F75's 4000mAh battery. Based on the manufacturer's specifications, this should translate to longer usage time between charges for the M3W.
Yes, the AULA F75 includes an integrated multimedia control knob. The vendor description states this knob allows for effortless fine-tuning of media settings, such as volume adjustment.
Yes, the Monsgeek M3W is well-suited for modding. It is offered as a DIY kit/barebones option and its listing confirms it comes with extra modding materials, including Teflon pads, extra tape, and 3mm Poron foam.
The AULA F75 is more portable. It has a smaller 75% layout, lighter weight (1023g vs 2000g), and more compact dimensions (323mm long vs 366mm) compared to the TKL-sized Monsgeek M3W.
Yes, both the AULA F75 and Monsgeek M3W feature hot-swappable sockets. The M3W's vendor page specifically notes its sockets support both 3-pin and 5-pin switches.
Both keyboards feature sound dampening. The AULA F75 uses a five-layer design with two Poron foam layers, an IXPE switch pad, a PET pad, and a silicone pad. The Monsgeek M3W uses Poron case foam, plate foams, an IXPE switch pad, and a VHB insulation layer.
The AULA F75's compatibility depends on the keycap version, as some have north-facing and some have south-facing RGB LEDs. The Monsgeek M3W has south-facing RGB LEDs, which avoids interference with Cherry-profile keycaps.
The AULA F75 uses a gasket mount style, while the Monsgeek M3W uses a plate mount style. Gasket mount typically aims for a softer, more isolated typing feel.
The AULA F75 may have an advantage for silent typing as its metadata lists silent switches as an available type. The Monsgeek M3W's metadata lists clicky and linear switches, but not silent ones.
Yes, according to the vendor description, the Monsgeek M3W supports RGB and key customization through the MonsGeek Driver software.
The AULA F75 comes with Cherry-profile double-shot PBT keycaps. The Monsgeek M3W comes with OEM-profile double-shot PBT keycaps, as stated in its product listing.
Based on the listed price ranges from vendors, the AULA F75 is available at a lower price point than the Monsgeek M3W.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.














![[In Stock] Xinmeng M75/M75Pro 75% Pre-Built Mechanical Keyboard](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0549/0262/0278/files/O1CN01QqPe0g1sgA8RTJI6B___2215624025795.png?v=1741766474&width=3840&quality=75)
