Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Oct 21, 2026

AULA F75 vs Xinmeng M75Gaming Performance vs TFT Screen

Choose the AULA F75 for a proven, performance-focused experience, or the Xinmeng M75 for its unique display and potentially higher-end materials.

EPOMAKER x AULA F75

Gaming Performance

AULA F75

4.5 · 509 reviews

from$49at Epomaker

Shop nowCompare 2 stores

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

AULA F75

Gaming Performance

If you want

  • Includes verified gaming features like a 1000 Hz polling rate and Rapid Trigger support.
  • Detailed five-layer sound dampening with Poron foam, IXPE, PET, and silicone pads.
  • High user satisfaction reflected in over 2000 reviews with a 4.56/5 average rating.

And can live with

  • Relatively heavy at 1023g and thick at 43mm, which may affect portability.
  • Battery capacity is 4000mAh, which is smaller than the Xinmeng M75's cell.
  • Lacks the distinctive TFT screen found on the competitor.

Get the

Xinmeng M75

TFT Screen

If you want

  • Features a unique 0.85-inch TFT screen that can display custom images, GIFs, and system info.
  • Larger 5000mAh battery with claimed battery life of up to 15 days with RGB off.
  • Slimmer 20mm profile for a potentially more portable form factor.

And can live with

  • No user reviews are available, making real-world performance and quality uncertain.
  • The product listing does not specify a polling rate or gaming-oriented features like Rapid Trigger.
  • Switch type is not specified in the metadata, unlike the AULA's confirmed silent linear option.

Bottom line

Your choice depends on what you value more: proven performance or novel features. The AULA F75 is the safer, more feature-complete option for most users, especially gamers and typists. The Xinmeng M75 is the more speculative pick for those who prioritize a sleek look, a customizable screen, and maximum battery life, and are comfortable without extensive user feedback.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

AULA F75

Xinmeng M75

  • Battery

    4,000 mAh

    5,000 mAh

  • Case material

    Plastic

    Aluminum, Copper

  • Display

    None

    TFT

  • Keycaps

    ABS, PBT

    PBT

  • Screw-in stabilizers

    Yes

    No

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • AULA F75
  • Xinmeng M75
Performance
64
51
Build quality
66
74
Productivity
92
65
Customizability
82
67
Portability
82
73

What they share

  • Layout size: 75%
  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • Mount style: Gasket Mount
  • Knob
  • Sound dampening
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The AULA F75 is the stronger choice for gaming, office use, and modding due to its verified performance specs, silent switch availability, and detailed internal construction. The Xinmeng M75 wins for travel and content creation, thanks to its slimmer profile, larger battery, and unique customizable TFT display. For programming, both keyboards are equally capable with their shared core layout and hot-swap features.

For gaming

Pick the AULA F75

  • The AULA F75 lists a 1000 Hz polling rate and Rapid Trigger support, which are explicitly mentioned gaming features.
  • Its vendor description emphasizes an 'ultra-responsive low-latency' connection for gaming.
  • The Xinmeng M75 listing does not specify a polling rate or mention gaming-specific trigger modes.

From real owners

What owners say

Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.

AULA F75

4.5

509 owner reviews

Praise
“Works exactly as intended and still works as new. The 2.4 GHz Receiver doesn't communicate correctly and isn't reliable but on BT and Cable it works perfectly”
MegaNoobyYTVerified buyer· via Epomaker
Critique
“I made an order for EPOMAKER x AULA 75 with express shipping on 27/1/24. Emailed the team TWICE. Now its 19/3/24, and i still dont have the item. Very poor service”
Faisal A.Verified buyer· via Epomaker

Xinmeng M75

No owner reviews collected yet.

Full specs

AULA F75 vs Xinmeng M75 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

12 of 23 specs differ

AULA F75

Xinmeng M75

Typing & switches

Switch options

Linear, Silent
—

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
Gasket Mount

Sound dampening

Yes
Yes

Screw-in stabilizers

Yes
No

Layout

Layout size

75%
75%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Knob

Yes
Yes

Display

None
TFT

Media keys

Yes
No

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

1,000 Hz
—

Battery

4,000 mAh
5,000 mAhBetter

USB-C

Yes
No

Build & materials

Case material

Plastic
Aluminum, Copper

Keycaps

ABS, PBT
PBT

Weight

1,023 g
—

Dimensions

43 x 143 x 323 mm
20 x 326 x 152 mm

Backlight

RGB, south-facing
RGB

Firmware & software

N-key rollover

Yes
No

Mac & Windows

Yes
No

Extras

Released

2023
2024

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

AULA F755 stores
  • EpomakerUS

    In stock
    $49Visit
  • VelocifireCN

    In stock
    $66Visit
  • AmazonGlobal

    Check price
    Visit
  • WhatGeekCN

    Out of stock
    $67Visit
Xinmeng M752 stores
  • MechkeysCN

    In stock
    $65Visit
  • AmazonGlobal

    Check price
    ~$65Visit

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

FAQ

AULA F75 vs Xinmeng M75: your questions

The AULA F75 is the better choice for competitive gaming. Its specifications include a 1000 Hz polling rate and support for Rapid Trigger, features directly associated with reduced input latency. The Xinmeng M75's listing does not mention a specific polling rate or these gaming-centric features.

According to the vendor description, the Xinmeng M75's 5000mAh battery provides up to 7 days of use with the RGB lighting turned on. The screen itself likely consumes some power, but the overall battery capacity is larger than the AULA F75's 4000mAh battery, which may help offset the drain.

Yes, both keyboards feature hot-swappable sockets. This allows you to easily remove and replace the mechanical switches without soldering, enabling customization of the typing feel and sound to your personal preference.

The AULA F75 is likely the quieter option. Its metadata specifies it offers silent linear switches, and its vendor description details a five-layer sound-dampening internal design with multiple foam and padding layers specifically to reduce typing noise. The Xinmeng M75's switch type is not specified.

Both the AULA F75 and Xinmeng M75 support three-mode connectivity. This includes a wired USB-C connection, a 2.4 GHz wireless connection using a dongle, and Bluetooth for connecting to multiple devices.

Both keyboards use PBT keycaps, which are more resistant to shine and wear compared to ABS plastic. The AULA F75 specifically uses Cherry-profile double-shot PBT keycaps, a detail highlighted by its vendor as being durable.

Both keyboards feature per-key RGB backlighting. The AULA F75 has dedicated software for Windows to customize its 16.8 million color lighting. The Xinmeng M75's vendor mentions customizable lighting effects and a musical rhythmic mode, but does not specify if dedicated software is required.

According to the vendor listing, the AULA F75 comes with the keyboard, a 2.4G wireless dongle, a Type-C cable, a 2-in-1 keycap and switch puller tool, and a user manual.

Both keyboards use a gasket mount design, which typically provides a softer, more flexible typing feel by suspending the plate and PCB on rubber gaskets. The AULA F75's vendor calls it a gasket structure, while the Xinmeng M75's vendor specifies a leaf-spring gasket-mounted structure.

The AULA F75's construction is explicitly detailed with a five-layer internal design that includes two layers of Poron foam, an IXPE switch pad, a PET sound enhancement pad, and a bottom silicone pad. The Xinmeng M75 also mentions five-layered internal padding with IXPE and PORON, but with less specific detail.

The Xinmeng M75 product listing does not explicitly state Mac/Win support. The AULA F75, however, includes 'Mac/Win Support' in its listed extra features, confirming cross-platform compatibility.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.