Which one should you get?
Get the
AULA F75
Gaming Performance
- Includes verified gaming features like a 1000 Hz polling rate and Rapid Trigger support.
- Detailed five-layer sound dampening with Poron foam, IXPE, PET, and silicone pads.
- High user satisfaction reflected in over 2000 reviews with a 4.56/5 average rating.
- Relatively heavy at 1023g and thick at 43mm, which may affect portability.
- Battery capacity is 4000mAh, which is smaller than the Xinmeng M75's cell.
- Lacks the distinctive TFT screen found on the competitor.
Get the
Xinmeng M75
TFT Screen
- Features a unique 0.85-inch TFT screen that can display custom images, GIFs, and system info.
- Larger 5000mAh battery with claimed battery life of up to 15 days with RGB off.
- Slimmer 20mm profile for a potentially more portable form factor.
- No user reviews are available, making real-world performance and quality uncertain.
- The product listing does not specify a polling rate or gaming-oriented features like Rapid Trigger.
- Switch type is not specified in the metadata, unlike the AULA's confirmed silent linear option.
Your choice depends on what you value more: proven performance or novel features. The AULA F75 is the safer, more feature-complete option for most users, especially gamers and typists. The Xinmeng M75 is the more speculative pick for those who prioritize a sleek look, a customizable screen, and maximum battery life, and are comfortable without extensive user feedback.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
AULA F75
Xinmeng M75
Battery
4,000 mAh
5,000 mAh
Case material
Plastic
Aluminum, Copper
Display
None
TFT
Keycaps
ABS, PBT
PBT
Screw-in stabilizers
Yes
No
- AULA F75
- Xinmeng M75
- Performance
- 6451
- Build quality
- 6674
- Productivity
- 9265
- Customizability
- 8267
- Portability
- 8273
- Layout size: 75%
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Knob
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The AULA F75 is the stronger choice for gaming, office use, and modding due to its verified performance specs, silent switch availability, and detailed internal construction. The Xinmeng M75 wins for travel and content creation, thanks to its slimmer profile, larger battery, and unique customizable TFT display. For programming, both keyboards are equally capable with their shared core layout and hot-swap features.
Pick the AULA F75
- The AULA F75 lists a 1000 Hz polling rate and Rapid Trigger support, which are explicitly mentioned gaming features.
- Its vendor description emphasizes an 'ultra-responsive low-latency' connection for gaming.
- The Xinmeng M75 listing does not specify a polling rate or mention gaming-specific trigger modes.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
AULA F75
509 owner reviews
“Works exactly as intended and still works as new. The 2.4 GHz Receiver doesn't communicate correctly and isn't reliable but on BT and Cable it works perfectly”
“I made an order for EPOMAKER x AULA 75 with express shipping on 27/1/24. Emailed the team TWICE. Now its 19/3/24, and i still dont have the item. Very poor service”
Xinmeng M75
No owner reviews collected yet.
AULA F75 vs Xinmeng M75 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
12 of 23 specs differ
AULA F75
Xinmeng M75
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Backlight
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
AULA F75 vs Xinmeng M75: your questions
The AULA F75 is the better choice for competitive gaming. Its specifications include a 1000 Hz polling rate and support for Rapid Trigger, features directly associated with reduced input latency. The Xinmeng M75's listing does not mention a specific polling rate or these gaming-centric features.
According to the vendor description, the Xinmeng M75's 5000mAh battery provides up to 7 days of use with the RGB lighting turned on. The screen itself likely consumes some power, but the overall battery capacity is larger than the AULA F75's 4000mAh battery, which may help offset the drain.
Yes, both keyboards feature hot-swappable sockets. This allows you to easily remove and replace the mechanical switches without soldering, enabling customization of the typing feel and sound to your personal preference.
The AULA F75 is likely the quieter option. Its metadata specifies it offers silent linear switches, and its vendor description details a five-layer sound-dampening internal design with multiple foam and padding layers specifically to reduce typing noise. The Xinmeng M75's switch type is not specified.
Both the AULA F75 and Xinmeng M75 support three-mode connectivity. This includes a wired USB-C connection, a 2.4 GHz wireless connection using a dongle, and Bluetooth for connecting to multiple devices.
Both keyboards use PBT keycaps, which are more resistant to shine and wear compared to ABS plastic. The AULA F75 specifically uses Cherry-profile double-shot PBT keycaps, a detail highlighted by its vendor as being durable.
Both keyboards feature per-key RGB backlighting. The AULA F75 has dedicated software for Windows to customize its 16.8 million color lighting. The Xinmeng M75's vendor mentions customizable lighting effects and a musical rhythmic mode, but does not specify if dedicated software is required.
According to the vendor listing, the AULA F75 comes with the keyboard, a 2.4G wireless dongle, a Type-C cable, a 2-in-1 keycap and switch puller tool, and a user manual.
Both keyboards use a gasket mount design, which typically provides a softer, more flexible typing feel by suspending the plate and PCB on rubber gaskets. The AULA F75's vendor calls it a gasket structure, while the Xinmeng M75's vendor specifies a leaf-spring gasket-mounted structure.
The AULA F75's construction is explicitly detailed with a five-layer internal design that includes two layers of Poron foam, an IXPE switch pad, a PET sound enhancement pad, and a bottom silicone pad. The Xinmeng M75 also mentions five-layered internal padding with IXPE and PORON, but with less specific detail.
The Xinmeng M75 product listing does not explicitly state Mac/Win support. The AULA F75, however, includes 'Mac/Win Support' in its listed extra features, confirming cross-platform compatibility.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.








![[In Stock] Xinmeng M75/M75Pro 75% Pre-Built Mechanical Keyboard](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0549/0262/0278/files/O1CN01QqPe0g1sgA8RTJI6B___2215624025795.png?v=1741766474&width=3840&quality=75)




