AULA F87 Pro vs Epomaker TH87
Choose the TH87 for its 10,000mAh battery and broader layout options, or the F87 Pro if its five-layer dampening and listed PBT-and-silicone case materials are the priority.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
4.8 (13)4.8 · 13 reviews
from$64at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
4.7 (16)4.7 · 16 reviews
from$60at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
AULA F87 Pro
Build quality in the bottom 45% of 80% boards under $100.
- Vendor describes five layers of sound-absorbing padding, including IXPE under-switch padding and PORON cotton.
- Vendor specifies full-key hot-swap sockets for 3-pin or 5-pin switches.
- PBT keycaps and a case listed as PBT and silicone.
- No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
Get the
Epomaker TH87
Battery
Build quality in the bottom 45% of 80% boards under $100.
- 10,000mAh battery, with vendor-listed estimates of up to 200 hours with backlight off and 45 hours at brightest backlight.
- Supports ANSI, ISO-DE, ISO-UK, JIS, and ISO layout standards.
- Vendor offers a Silent linear switch option for quieter typing.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
Pick the Epomaker TH87 if you need ISO layouts, a larger battery, a silent switch option, or a stated 1000 Hz polling rate in wired and 2.4 GHz modes. Choose the AULA F87 Pro if broader 3-pin and 5-pin switch compatibility and its vendor-described slotted PCB better fit your modding plans. If you use shine-through keycaps, account for the TH87's south-facing LED compatibility limitation.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
AULA F87 Pro
Epomaker TH87
Battery
4,000 mAh
10,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Case material
PBT, Silicone
ABS
Weight
1,023 g
1,000 g
Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel
Layout standard
ANSI
ANSI, ISO, ISO-DE, ISO-UK, JIS
ISO and JIS exist so regional layouts fit
Plate material
Plastic
Polycarbonate
- AULA F87 Pro
- Epomaker TH87
- Performance
- 6074
- Build quality
- 5959
- Productivity
- 6275
- Customizability
- 5258
- Portability
- 6985
- Layout size: 80%
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Sound dampening
- Keycaps: PBT
What will you mostly use it for?
The TH87 leads in most categories where its larger battery, multiple layout standards, silent switch option, and stated polling rate matter. The F87 Pro has a narrower advantage for switch-focused modification, with the vendor specifying support for both 3-pin and 5-pin switches and describing its slotted PCB. Both are compact TKL boards with wireless and wired connectivity, hot-swap support, and gasket mounting. For travel, the TH87 is marginally lighter, though both weigh about a kilogram.
Pick the Epomaker TH87
- The TH87 lists 1000 Hz polling in wired and 2.4 GHz modes, while no polling rate is listed for the F87 Pro.
- The TH87 supports N-key rollover.
- The F87 Pro vendor description advertises 3ms response time, so latency-specific claims favor it only if that listed figure is the deciding factor.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
AULA F87 Pro
13 owner reviews
“It’s nice but if it was with the volume thing on the top right like in the aula 75 it would be much better”
“When I charge the keyboard it only holds for like 10 hours and then I need to charge again”
Epomaker TH87
16 owner reviews
“Im really happy with the overall quality of the keyboard. The silent switches are really great for working and gaming as well.”
“Ill start with the positives. - it sound creamy and has a great feel on the fingers. - a ten keyless that has all the functionality that i need In theory this is the perfect keyboard but i have had 1 issue that has been bugging me so much. Ever so often the…”
AULA F87 Pro vs Epomaker TH87 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
10 of 22 specs differ
AULA F87 Pro
Epomaker TH87
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
ISO layouts by store
Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.
AULA F87 Pro
No ISO layout at the stores we track.
Epomaker TH87
Epomaker
ISO-DE, ISO-UK
In stockShips to you
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
AULA F87 Pro vs Epomaker TH87: your questions
The TH87 has the broader layout selection, a 10,000mAh battery, a silent switch option, and a listed 1000 Hz polling rate in wired and 2.4 GHz modes. The F87 Pro specifies 3-pin and 5-pin hot-swap support and a single-key slotted PCB in its vendor description.
No. The F87 Pro is listed as ANSI, and its compatibility rule says ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
Yes. The TH87's listed layout standards include ISO-DE, ISO-UK, JIS, and ISO, alongside ANSI.
The Epomaker TH87 has a 10,000mAh battery, while the AULA F87 Pro has a 4,000mAh battery. The TH87 vendor description estimates up to 200 hours with backlighting off and 45 hours at brightest backlighting.
The TH87 offers a Silent linear switch option, which the vendor describes for office and night use. The F87 Pro vendor description lists pre-lubed linear switches, but does not identify a silent switch option.
The TH87 lists 1000 Hz polling in wired and 2.4 GHz modes and supports N-key rollover. The F87 Pro vendor page advertises a 3ms response time, but its metadata does not list a polling rate.
Yes, both are listed as hot-swappable. The F87 Pro vendor description specifies 3-pin or 5-pin switch support, while the TH87 vendor description specifies a 5-pin hot-swappable PCB.
Both list Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connectivity. The TH87 vendor description calls these tri-mode connections and specifies USB A-to-C for wired use.
The TH87 has south-facing LEDs, and its compatibility rule warns that shine-through legends stay dark. It also notes that some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
The TH87's vendor description names PORON sandwich foam, an IXPE switch pad, a sound enhancement pad, an EPDM switch socket pad, and a silicone bottom. It also describes a gasket-mounted structure and flex-cut plate and PCB.
The F87 Pro vendor describes five layers of sound-absorbing padding, including IXPE under-switch padding and PORON cotton. It also identifies a gasket-mounted PC plate, silicone pad, and single-key slotted PCB.
The TH87 is listed at 1000g, compared with 1023g for the F87 Pro. Both are 80% keyboards with Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz connectivity, and both weigh about a kilogram.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.