AULA F99 vs Epomaker Galaxy100 LiteAluminum vs Plastic Build
Choose the Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite for its premium aluminum build and advanced QMK/VIA firmware, or the AULA F99 for a more affordable entry with a lighter plastic case.
Which one should you get?
Get the
AULA F99
Aluminum
- Includes a rapid trigger feature for gaming.
- Lighter weight (1023g) for easier portability.
- Offers a choice of PC or FR4 plates for sound customization.
- Case is made of ABS plastic, not aluminum.
- Uses proprietary AULA driver software, not QMK/VIA.
- Screw-in stabilizers may be less preferred by some modders compared to other types.
Get the
Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite
Plastic Build
- Case is constructed from powder-sprayed CNC aluminum alloy.
- Full support for QMK and VIA open-source firmware.
- Includes a programmable knob.
- Substantially heavier at 1660g.
- South-facing RGB may not shine through some keycap legends as well.
- Plate-mount stabilizers are listed as not compatible with screw-in types.
Your budget and need for customization are the deciding factors. The Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite justifies its higher cost with a durable aluminum build, QMK/VIA firmware, and a knob, making it a long-term platform for enthusiasts. The AULA F99 delivers core features like gasket mount, hot-swap, and wireless connectivity in a lighter plastic package, representing strong value, especially for gamers wanting rapid trigger.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
AULA F99
Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite
Rapid trigger
Yes
No
Case material
ABS, PBT, Plastic
Aluminum
Switch options
Linear
Clicky, Linear
Knob
No
Yes
Weight
1,023 g
1,660 g
- AULA F99
- Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite
- Performance
- 5882
- Build quality
- 5783
- Productivity
- 8793
- Customizability
- 6589
- Portability
- 6265
- Layout size: 96%
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Battery: 8,000 mAh
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite wins for use cases demanding deep customization, such as programming and content creation, thanks to QMK/VIA support. The AULA F99 is better for gaming due to its rapid trigger and lighter weight, and is the clear choice for travel. For general office work, both keyboards are equally capable with their shared layout and connectivity.
Pick the AULA F99
- The AULA F99 lists a specific rapid trigger feature.
- Its lighter weight (1023g) may be preferable for quick desk movements.
- North-facing RGB is less likely to interfere with Cherry-profile keycaps.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
AULA F99
33 owner reviews
“I am really enjoying using AULA f99! UX is 10/10 The only negative thing is the battery indicator, I find it quite confusing therefore I turned it off alltogether.”
“Good product - poor service. The order wasnt filed and the stock ran out. Then for the replacement item to be filled it took way too long for the order to arrive and complete a customer build.”
Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite
33 owner reviews
“I like the feel and the sounds the keyboard has. However, one of the foot is missing, and there's no feature to disable the backlight from numlock.”
“Had it for maybe a month or two and it no longer works, the lighting is gone and it won’t even turn on now”
AULA F99 vs Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
13 of 27 specs differ
AULA F99
Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite
Switch options
Rapid trigger
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
AULA F99 vs Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite: your questions
The Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite features a case made from powder-sprayed CNC aluminum alloy. The AULA F99 uses an ABS plastic case.
Yes, but the method differs. The Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite supports QMK and VIA for deep, open-source customization. The AULA F99 uses a proprietary AULA driver for remapping and macros.
No. Only the Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite includes a knob. The AULA F99 does not have a knob.
Both aim for a good sound with gasket mounts and sound dampening. The Galaxy100 Lite details a 5-layer system with Poron, IXPE, EMDP, and PET pads. The AULA F99 also lists five layers including sandwich foam, IXPE, PET film, bottom foam, and a silicone case pad.
Both keyboards are equipped with large 8000mAh batteries, which should provide extended usage between charges. The exact runtime will depend on usage patterns and RGB settings.
Yes. Both the AULA F99 and the Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite feature hot-swappable PCBs, allowing you to change switches without soldering.
The AULA F99 is significantly lighter at 1023 grams compared to the Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite's 1660 grams. This makes the F99 the more portable option.
Rapid trigger is a feature listed for the AULA F99, often used in gaming to allow quicker successive keystrokes by resetting the actuation point dynamically. The Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite's description does not mention this feature.
According to its vendor page, the AULA F99 offers a choice between a Polycarbonate (PC) plate or an FR4 plate. The Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite uses a PP plate.
The Galaxy100 Lite includes the keyboard, a USB cable, a 2-in-1 puller, two extra switches, three Mac keycaps, a 2.4GHz dongle, and a manual. The AULA F99 includes the keyboard, a 2.4G receiver, a switch puller, two spare switches, and a USB-C cable.
The AULA F99 uses north-facing RGB LEDs. The Epomaker Galaxy100 Lite uses south-facing RGB LEDs.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.