Which one should you get?
Get the
AULA F99
Compact Layout
- 96% layout includes a numpad in a relatively compact form factor.
- Large 8000mAh battery for extended wireless use.
- Includes multiple plate options (PC and FR4) in some configurations for sound customization.
- Case is constructed from ABS plastic, lacking the premium feel of aluminum.
- Software driver is listed as only supporting Windows, limiting customization on other OS.
- Lacks the explicit firmware customization (QMK/VIA) and stated high polling rate of the Nuphy.
Get the
Nuphy Halo75 V2
Premium Build
- Features an aluminum top case for a more premium build and feel.
- Full support for QMK and VIA open-source firmware for extensive key remapping and macros.
- Explicitly lists a 1000Hz polling rate for both wired and 2.4GHz wireless modes.
- Smaller 4000mAh battery is half the capacity of the AULA F99's.
- 75% layout omits the numpad, which some users require.
- Commands a higher price than the AULA F99.
Your priority should guide this choice. If you need a numpad for work, want the longest possible battery life, and are on a tighter budget, the AULA F99 delivers exceptional value. If you value a premium aluminum build, demand the deepest level of firmware customization with QMK/VIA, and want a keyboard with explicitly stated high-performance wireless specs, the Nuphy Halo75 V2 is worth the investment. Consider how much you use the numpad versus how much you value materials and software freedom.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
AULA F99
Nuphy Halo75 V2
Layout size
96%
75%
Rapid trigger
Yes
No
Battery
8,000 mAh
4,000 mAh
Case material
ABS, PBT, Plastic
ABS, Aluminum
Switch options
Linear
Mechanical
- AULA F99
- Nuphy Halo75 V2
- Performance
- 5880
- Build quality
- 5781
- Productivity
- 8788
- Customizability
- 6589
- Portability
- 6281
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Sound dampening
- Keycaps: PBT
What will you mostly use it for?
The AULA F99 wins for office use due to its integrated numpad and superior battery capacity. The Nuphy Halo75 V2 is the stronger choice for gaming, programming, and modding, thanks to its stated high polling rate, QMK/VIA firmware, and detailed sound-dampening construction. For travel, the Nuphy's smaller 75% form factor is more portable, while content creation is a draw, balancing the F99's numpad against the Halo75's macro capabilities.
Pick the Nuphy Halo75 V2
- The Nuphy Halo75 V2 lists a 1000Hz polling rate for its 2.4GHz and wired modes, which can benefit responsiveness.
- Its listing includes N-Key Rollover support for accurate multi-key presses.
- The AULA F99's vendor description mentions a 'rapid trigger' feature, but the Nuphy's quantified polling rate is a clearer performance spec for gaming.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
AULA F99
33 owner reviews
“I am really enjoying using AULA f99! UX is 10/10 The only negative thing is the battery indicator, I find it quite confusing therefore I turned it off alltogether.”
“Good product - poor service. The order wasnt filed and the stock ran out. Then for the replacement item to be filled it took way too long for the order to arrive and complete a customer build.”
Nuphy Halo75 V2
No owner reviews collected yet.
AULA F99 vs Nuphy Halo75 V2 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
15 of 27 specs differ
AULA F99
Nuphy Halo75 V2
Switch options
Rapid trigger
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Screw-in stabilizers
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Display
Media keys
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
AULA F99 vs Nuphy Halo75 V2: your questions
The AULA F99 has a significantly larger 8000mAh battery compared to the Nuphy Halo75 V2's 4000mAh battery. Based on the listed capacities, the F99 should last much longer between charges, especially with RGB lighting enabled.
Yes, the Nuphy Halo75 V2 vendor description states it is compatible with macOS, Windows, and Linux. Its QMK/VIA firmware support is particularly beneficial for customization on all these operating systems through a browser.
Yes, both keyboards are hot-swappable. This means you can replace the mechanical switches without any soldering, using the included switch puller. Both support standard 3-pin and 5-pin MX-style switches.
Both use a gasket mount design for a softer typing feel. The AULA F99's vendor page describes a five-layer sound system with foam and silicone. The Nuphy Halo75 V2 listing details a six-piece sound stack including specific foams and pads. The Nuphy also uses a POM plate, which typically produces a deeper sound compared to the F99's available PC or FR4 plates.
Yes, the AULA F99 uses the AULA DRIVER software for remapping keys, adjusting RGB, and creating macros. However, the vendor notes this driver only supports the Windows operating system.
QMK/VIA is open-source firmware that allows deep, system-level customization of key functions, layers, and macros, which is saved directly to the keyboard's hardware. The AULA software is a proprietary Windows application for remapping and lighting. QMK/VIA offers greater flexibility and cross-platform compatibility.
The Nuphy Halo75 V2 is more compact. It uses a 75% layout measuring 320mm wide, while the AULA F99 is a 96% layout measuring 391mm wide. The Nuphy saves space by removing the numpad and navigation cluster.
The AULA F99 does not include a wrist rest. The Nuphy Halo75 V2 does not include one in the base box, but the vendor offers optional Twotone acrylic and wooden wrist rests for separate purchase.
According to the vendor page, the Nuphy Halo75 V2 comes with a choice of Nuphy-branded linear or tactile switches (Mint, Raspberry, Lemon) or Cherry Silent Red Clear-Top switches. The AULA F99 listing mentions LEOBOG Greywood V3 switches.
The keycap material is listed as PBT for both. The Nuphy Halo75 V2 description specifies its mSA profile keycaps use a triple-shot injection process for the homing bars. The AULA F99 uses Cherry-profile PBT keycaps, but the manufacturing method isn't detailed.
The AULA F99 uses north-facing RGB LEDs. The Nuphy Halo75 V2 uses south-facing RGB LEDs. South-facing LEDs are generally preferred as they don't interfere with the sound or fit of Cherry-profile keycaps.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.














