Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Nov 10, 2026

AULA F99 vs Epomaker TH99Battery Life vs Gaming Latency

Choose the AULA F99 for superior battery life and portability, or the Epomaker TH99 for its specified low-latency gaming performance.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Battery Life

AULA F99

AULA F99 Gasket Mechanical Keyboard - Image: 2

4.8 (33)

$63at Epomaker

90-day low

Gaming Latency

Epomaker TH99

EPOMAKER TH99 - Image: 3

5.0 (48)

$66at Epomaker

90-day low

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

AULA F99

Battery Life

Build quality in the top 40% of 96% boards under $100.

If you want

  • Large 8000mAh battery for extended wireless use.
  • Significantly lighter at 1023g for better portability.
  • Offers a choice between Polycarbonate and FR4 plates.

Rules this board out

  • North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.

Get the

Epomaker TH99

Gaming Latency

Build quality in the bottom 40% of 96% boards under $100.

If you want

  • Specifies a 1000Hz polling rate and 2ms latency for wired gaming.
  • Includes N-Key Rollover for precise keypress registration.
  • South-facing RGB LEDs avoid interference with keycaps.

Rules this board out

  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.

Bottom line

Your primary need dictates the choice. For a keyboard you can take anywhere and rarely charge, the AULA F99 is the clear winner. If you are a competitive gamer who values confirmed low latency and high polling rates, the Epomaker TH99 provides the specific performance metrics you need. Both are competent pre-built boards, but they excel in different areas.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

AULA F99

Epomaker TH99

  • Rapid trigger

    Yes

    No

    Faster resets help in games and not in normal typing

  • Battery

    8,000 mAh

    4,000 mAh

    A larger battery means fewer cables during the day

  • Case material

    ABS, PBT, Plastic

    ABS

  • Switch options

    Linear

    Linear, Silent

  • Weight

    1,023 g

    2,000 g

    Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • AULA F99
  • Epomaker TH99
Performance
73
74
Build quality
70
59
Productivity
86
76
Customizability
65
58
Portability
62
54

What they share

  • Layout size: 96%
  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • Mount style: Gasket Mount
  • Sound dampening
  • Keycaps: PBT
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The AULA F99 is the more versatile choice, winning for office use, travel, modding, and content creation due to its battery, weight, and plate options. The Epomaker TH99 takes a clear lead for gaming, thanks to its published latency and polling rate specifications. For programming, both keyboards are equally capable with their shared layout and hot-swap features.

For gaming

Pick the Epomaker TH99

  • The Epomaker TH99 listing specifies a 1000Hz polling rate and 2ms latency in wired mode.
  • It includes N-Key Rollover for anti-ghosting, a feature not mentioned for the AULA F99.
  • The manufacturer states it has a 2-5ms latency in its 2.4GHz wireless mode.

From real owners

What owners say

Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.

AULA F99

4.8

33 owner reviews

Praise
“I am really enjoying using AULA f99! UX is 10/10 The only negative thing is the battery indicator, I find it quite confusing therefore I turned it off alltogether.”
Aleksandar V.Verified buyer· via Epomaker
Critique
“Good product - poor service. The order wasnt filed and the stock ran out. Then for the replacement item to be filled it took way too long for the order to arrive and complete a customer build.”
Geoffrey P.Verified buyer· via Epomaker

Epomaker TH99

5.0

48 owner reviews

Praise
“This keyboard is of very good quality, robust, its keys are pleasant to press and its versatility as it can be connected to various devices makes it perfect.”
Diana P.Verified buyer· via Epomaker

Full specs

AULA F99 vs Epomaker TH99 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

11 of 23 specs differ

AULA F99

Epomaker TH99

Typing & switches

Switch options

Linear
Linear, Silent

Rapid trigger

Yes
No

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
Gasket Mount

Sound dampening

Yes
Yes

Screw-in stabilizers

Yes
No

Layout

Layout size

96%
96%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Display

None
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

—
1,000 Hz

Battery

8,000 mAhBetter
4,000 mAh

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

ABS, PBT, Plastic
ABS

Plate material

FR4, Plastic, Polycarbonate
Plastic

Keycaps

PBT
PBT

Weight

1,023 g
2,000 g

Dimensions

43 x 147 x 391 mm
20 x 402 x 303 mm

Backlight

RGB, north-facing
RGB, south-facing

Firmware & software

N-key rollover

No
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
Yes

Extras

Released

2023
2025

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

AULA F994 stores

FAQ

AULA F99 vs Epomaker TH99: your questions

The AULA F99 has a significantly larger 8000mAh battery, while the Epomaker TH99 has a 4000mAh battery. This means the F99 will typically last much longer between charges, which is a major advantage for wireless use.

Based on published specs, the Epomaker TH99 has advantages for gaming. Its product listing specifies a 1000Hz polling rate, 2ms latency in wired mode, and N-Key Rollover. The AULA F99's gaming performance specifications are not detailed in the same way.

Yes, both keyboards feature hot-swappable sockets, allowing you to change switches without soldering. The TH99's sockets are compatible with both 3-pin and 5-pin mechanical switches.

The AULA F99 weighs 1023 grams, making it considerably lighter and more portable. The Epomaker TH99 is much heavier at 2000 grams, which may contribute to a more stable, desk-bound feel.

Yes, both the AULA F99 and Epomaker TH99 list Mac and Windows support. The TH99 vendor page specifically mentions an intuitive toggle to switch between Mac and Win modes.

The AULA F99 offers more modding-friendly components. It comes with a choice of PC or FR4 plates and uses screw-in stabilizers. The Epomaker TH99 uses a PC plate and plate-mount stabilizers, which its listing notes are not compatible with screw-in types.

Both have per-key RGB, but the LED orientation differs. The AULA F99 uses north-facing LEDs, while the Epomaker TH99 uses south-facing LEDs. South-facing LEDs avoid interference with the legends on Cherry-profile keycaps.

No. According to its technical specifications, the Epomaker TH99 is listed as not compatible with PS4, PS5, or Nintendo Switch. Compatibility for the AULA F99 with consoles is not stated.

The AULA F99 includes a keyboard, a 2.4G receiver, a switch puller, two spare switches, and a USB Type-C cable, as listed on its vendor page. The Epomaker TH99 includes a keyboard, USB cable, user manual, and a keycap puller.

Both feature gasket mounts and five layers of sound-dampening materials for a quieter sound. The Epomaker TH99 also offers an optional 'Sea Salt Silent' linear switch, which is specifically designed to reduce noise.

Both use PBT plastic keycaps for durability. The AULA F99 uses a Cherry profile, while the Epomaker TH99 uses Cherry profile for ANSI layouts and OEM profile for its ISO-DE variant.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.