Epomaker Carbon60 vs G84 Pro60% or 75% layout
Choose the Carbon60 for a lighter 60% carbon build with QMK/VIA, or the G84 Pro for a 75% layout with a screen and knob.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker Carbon60
Build quality in the top 20% of 60% boards under $100.
- Carbon fiber case and plate with a listed weight of 500g.
- QMK and VIA support alongside hot-swappable switches.
- 60% ANSI layout with Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connectivity.
- Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
- South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
- Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Get the
Epomaker G84 Pro
Battery
Build quality in the top 45% of 75% boards under $100.
- 75% ANSI layout with a screen and metal knob.
- Gasket mount and five sound-dampening layers, including PORON foam, IXPE switch pad, PET sound enhancer, and bottom silicone.
- 8000mAh battery and Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connectivity.
- No numpad.
Pick the Carbon60 if a 500g carbon fiber board and QMK/VIA remapping matter more than a fuller layout, and account for its low-profile-only keycap and switch fit. Choose the G84 Pro if you want 75% coverage, a screen, a knob, and a larger battery. For daily use, the key decision is compactness and firmware flexibility versus more on-board controls.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker Carbon60
Epomaker G84 Pro
Layout size
60%
75%
Battery
3,000 mAh
8,000 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Low profile
Yes
No
Case material
Carbon Fiber
ABS, Plastic
Switch options
Linear, Tactile
Clicky, Linear, Silent
- Epomaker Carbon60
- Epomaker G84 Pro
- Performance
- 7478
- Build quality
- 7668
- Productivity
- 8283
- Customizability
- 8673
- Portability
- 8891
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Sound dampening
What will you mostly use it for?
The Carbon60 has the edge for travel and remapping-focused customization, particularly for buyers who value low weight and QMK/VIA. The G84 Pro is a stronger fit for office and content-creation setups that benefit from a larger layout, a display, and a knob. Gaming leans toward the G84 Pro based on its stated latency figures and fuller layout, though both specify 1000 Hz polling on wired and 2.4 GHz. Programming depends on whether compactness and QMK/VIA or more directly available keys matter more.
Pick the Epomaker G84 Pro
- Both list 1000 Hz polling over wired and 2.4 GHz, while the G84 Pro vendor description specifies 2 ms wired and 5 ms 2.4 GHz latency.
- The G84 Pro has an 84-key 75% layout, compared with the Carbon60's 60% layout without dedicated arrow keys.
- The G84 Pro supports linear, clicky, and silent switches in its metadata, while the Carbon60 lists tactile and linear.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker Carbon60
22 owner reviews
“I'm using it well. However, it would be nice if the right shift key was smaller so there was only one more key. Thank you for making a great keyboard.”
Epomaker G84 Pro
14 owner reviews
“It's my first actual better keyboard, i was using some redragon dragon born keyboard but switching to this keyboard is like heaven for me, perfect sound perfect feel and everything”
“I enjoy the keyboard itself but still have yet to get the software to work. Any help?”
Epomaker Carbon60 vs G84 Pro specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
14 of 26 specs differ
Epomaker Carbon60
Epomaker G84 Pro
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Low profile
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker Carbon60 vs G84 Pro: your questions
The Carbon60 is a 60% low-profile keyboard with a carbon fiber case and plate, and it supports QMK and VIA. The G84 Pro is a 75% gasket-mount model with a screen, knob, and 8000mAh battery.
The Carbon60 has a 60% ANSI layout, while the G84 Pro uses a 75% layout. The Carbon60 has no function row or dedicated arrow keys, while the G84 Pro provides a larger key layout.
The Carbon60 weighs 500g, while the G84 Pro weighs 970g. The Carbon60 is the lighter option for buyers prioritizing a lower-weight board.
Both support Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired USB-C connectivity. The Carbon60 vendor description identifies Bluetooth 5.0, and the G84 Pro vendor description says Bluetooth can pair with up to three devices.
The Carbon60 lists both QMK and VIA support, with the vendor specifying that QMK runs over wired connection. QMK and VIA are not listed for the G84 Pro.
Yes, both list hot-swappable switches. The vendors specify 3-pin and 5-pin switch support for both models.
No, the Carbon60 compatibility rules specify low-profile switches and keycaps only, and say standard MX keycaps will not fit. The G84 Pro's vendor description identifies Cherry-profile keycaps.
The G84 Pro has an interactive glass screen and a metal knob. The vendor says the screen shows time, battery, and status, while the knob controls volume, RGB, and screen functions.
The G84 Pro has an 8000mAh battery, compared with 3000mAh in the Carbon60. The Carbon60 vendor lists up to 176.4 hours with the backlight off, while the G84 Pro is described as offering weeks of wireless typing with the backlight off.
Both list 1000 Hz polling over wired and 2.4 GHz connections. The G84 Pro vendor lists 2 ms wired and 5 ms 2.4 GHz latency, while the Carbon60 vendor lists 4 ms and 10 ms for those connections.
The Carbon60 uses low-profile DSA keycaps, and its compatibility rules say standard MX keycaps will not fit. Its south-facing LEDs can also leave shine-through legends dark or interfere with some sculpted keycaps.
The G84 Pro's compatibility rule says it has no numpad. Its 75% layout is larger than the Carbon60's 60% layout, but buyers needing a dedicated numpad should account for that limitation.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.










