Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Oct 31, 2026

Epomaker Carbon60 vs RT98Compact vs Modular Layout

Choose the Carbon60 for a light, compact QMK board, or the RT98 for its numpad, repositionable layout, and magnetic display.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

EPOMAKER Carbon60

Compact

Epomaker Carbon60

4.8 · 22 reviews

from$71at Epomaker

90-day low

EPOMAKER RT98

Modular Layout

Epomaker RT98

4.7 · 23 reviews

from$101at Epomaker

90-day low

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

Epomaker Carbon60

Compact

Build quality in the top 20% of 60% boards under $100.

If you want

  • Carbon-fiber case and plate with a listed weight of 500g.
  • Supports hot-swapping, QMK, and VIA.
  • Three-layer dampening includes a sandwich pad, switch pad, and bottom foam.

Rules this board out

  • Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
  • Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.

Get the

Epomaker RT98

Modular Layout

Build quality in the top 30% of 98% boards under $150.

If you want

  • 98% layout with a repositionable numpad for southpaw or right-handed use.
  • Magnetic Mini TV display supports system information and custom GIFs.
  • Gasket mount with five dampening layers, including latex foam, IXPE, PET, bottom foam, and silicone.

Rules this board out

  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
  • Compact full-size layout. The numpad is present, the gaps of a full-size board are not.

Bottom line

Pick the Carbon60 if low weight, carbon-fiber construction, and QMK remapping matter more than dedicated keys or a standard-height keycap setup. Choose the RT98 if you want a numpad that can move to either side, a magnetic display, and a larger typing layout. Both provide wireless and wired connectivity, hot-swap support, and VIA.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

Epomaker Carbon60

Epomaker RT98

  • Layout size

    60%

    98%

  • Battery

    3,000 mAh

    8,000 mAh

    A larger battery means fewer cables during the day

  • Low profile

    Yes

    No

  • Ergonomics

    Standard

    Southpaw

  • Case material

    Carbon Fiber

    ABS

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • Epomaker Carbon60
  • Epomaker RT98
Performance
74
77
Build quality
76
72
Productivity
82
84
Customizability
86
78
Portability
88
65

What they share

  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • VIA
  • Sound dampening
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The Carbon60 is the travel-oriented choice, with substantially lower weight and a smaller 60% layout. The RT98 has the edge for office work and content creation thanks to its silent switch option, numpad, and magnetic display. For gaming, its movable numpad and listed polling rate stand out, though the Carbon60 is easier to carry between setups. Modding favors the Carbon60 for QMK support, while the RT98 offers physical layout flexibility; programming depends on whether remapping or dedicated keys matter more.

For gaming

Pick the Epomaker RT98

  • The RT98’s numpad can be repositioned to create more mouse space or place extra keys beside the keyboard hand.
  • The RT98 lists 1000Hz polling over USB and 2.4GHz, and offers linear or silent linear switches.
  • The Carbon60 is lighter at 500g, but its compact layout has no dedicated arrow keys or function row.

From real owners

What owners say

Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.

Epomaker Carbon60

4.8

22 owner reviews

Praise
“I'm using it well. However, it would be nice if the right shift key was smaller so there was only one more key. Thank you for making a great keyboard.”
강민주Verified buyer· via Epomaker

Epomaker RT98

4.7

23 owner reviews

Praise
“High quality parts, seamless web application for the mini TV, just perfection in the form of a keyboard. Epomaker consistently exceeds my expectations every time.”
Jeannine D.Verified buyer· via Epomaker

Full specs

Epomaker Carbon60 vs RT98 specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

12 of 24 specs differ

Epomaker Carbon60

Epomaker RT98

Typing & switches

Switch options

Linear, Tactile
Linear, Silent

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

—
Gasket Mount

Low profile

Yes
No

Sound dampening

Yes
Yes

Layout

Layout size

60%
98%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI

Ergonomics

Standard
Southpaw

Display

None
Yes

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

1,000 Hz
—

Battery

3,000 mAh
8,000 mAhBetter

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Carbon Fiber
ABS

Plate material

CarbonFiber
—

Keycaps

ABS
PBT

Weight

500 g
1,200 g

Dimensions

27 x 102 x 297 mm
45 x 390 x 150 mm

Backlight

RGB, south-facing
RGB, south-facing

Firmware & software

QMK

Yes
No

VIA

Yes
Yes

N-key rollover

Yes
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
Yes

Extras

Released

2025
2026

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

FAQ

Epomaker Carbon60 vs RT98: your questions

The Carbon60 is the lighter, smaller option at 500g with a 60% layout. The RT98 weighs 1200g in the product metadata and has a larger 98% layout.

The RT98 has a numpad that can be detached and repositioned for southpaw or right-handed use. The Carbon60 is a 60% layout without a numpad.

Yes, the Carbon60 lists both QMK and VIA support. Epomaker describes QMK as operating over a wired connection.

The RT98 lists VIA support and hot-swapping for 3- or 5-pin mechanical switches. QMK support is not listed for this model.

No, the Carbon60’s compatibility rule specifies low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.

Epomaker says the magnetic display can show time, date, and status, as well as custom GIFs. The vendor describes it as attaching via PogPins.

The RT98 has a silent linear switch option that Epomaker describes as suited to office and night use. The Carbon60 offers tactile or linear switches, but no silent option is listed.

Both support Bluetooth and 2.4GHz wireless, as well as wired USB-C connectivity. The Carbon60 has a 3000mAh battery, while the RT98 has an 8000mAh battery.

The Carbon60 has three listed dampening layers: a sandwich pad, switch pad, and bottom foam. The RT98 lists five layers, including latex foam, an IXPE switch pad, a PET sound-enhancement pad, bottom foam, and bottom silicone.

Yes, both models list hot-swap support. The Carbon60 vendor description specifies 3- or 5-pin switches, and the RT98 lists support for 3- or 5-pin mechanical switches.

Both list south-facing per-key RGB. Their compatibility rules warn that shine-through legends may stay dark and that some sculpted keycaps can clip the LEDs.

The RT98 includes a repositionable numpad, making it the clearer fit for frequent number entry. The Carbon60’s 60% layout does not include a numpad.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.