Epomaker G84 Pro vs Luma4075% or 40% layout
Choose the G84 Pro for a more conventional 75% layout and larger battery, or the Luma40 for a lighter aluminum 40% board with QMK and VIA support.
KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
3.9 · 14 reviews
from$76at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
5.0 · 3 reviews
from$92at Epomaker
90-day lowLowest price in 90 days
Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker G84 Pro
Battery
Build quality in the top 45% of 75% boards under $100.
- 75% ANSI layout with a more conventional key arrangement than a 40% board.
- 8,000mAh battery, compared with the Luma40’s 1,450mAh capacity.
- Interactive glass screen displays time, battery, and status, and supports custom GIFs through the vendor-described web software.
- No numpad.
Get the
Epomaker Luma40
Build quality in the top 15% of 40% boards under $150.
- CNC-cut aluminum case, with a listed weight of 410g.
- QMK and VIA support for remapping, layouts, and macros.
- Compact 40% ortholinear layout measuring 240 x 87 x 21 mm.
- Low-profile switches and keycaps only. Standard MX keycaps will not fit.
- North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
- Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Pick the G84 Pro if you want a conventional 75% layout, a larger battery, and a screen-and-knob control cluster. Choose the Luma40 if a small, light ortholinear board and QMK/VIA programming matter more, and you are comfortable with its low-profile-only keycap and switch constraints.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker G84 Pro
Epomaker Luma40
Layout size
75%
40%
Battery
8,000 mAh
1,450 mAh
A larger battery means fewer cables during the day
Low profile
No
Yes
Ergonomics
Standard
Ortholinear
Case material
ABS, Plastic
Aluminum
- Epomaker G84 Pro
- Epomaker Luma40
- Performance
- 7874
- Build quality
- 6881
- Productivity
- 8388
- Customizability
- 7385
- Portability
- 9185
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Sound dampening
- Plate material: Polycarbonate
What will you mostly use it for?
The G84 Pro is the easier fit for buyers who want a familiar compact layout, a screen, and more battery capacity. The Luma40 stands out for portability and programmable layouts, provided its 40% ortholinear format fits your habits. Gaming and office use lean toward the G84 Pro on layout, while programming, travel, and modding favor the Luma40’s form factor and remapping support. The screen and knob give the G84 Pro a particular advantage for desk-based content workflows.
Pick the Epomaker G84 Pro
- The G84 Pro’s 75% layout provides a more conventional arrangement than the Luma40’s 40% ortholinear layout.
- Both list a 1000 Hz polling rate and N-key rollover, while the G84 Pro vendor description specifies 1000 Hz in wired and 2.4 GHz modes.
- The G84 Pro includes a screen and metal knob for status and volume or RGB adjustments.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker G84 Pro
14 owner reviews
“It's my first actual better keyboard, i was using some redragon dragon born keyboard but switching to this keyboard is like heaven for me, perfect sound perfect feel and everything”
“I enjoy the keyboard itself but still have yet to get the software to work. Any help?”
Epomaker Luma40
3 owner reviews
“Hello there the luma 40 is one of my favorite keebs i used i can bring it anywhere with me i really love it thanks u guys”
Epomaker G84 Pro vs Luma40 specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
15 of 26 specs differ
Epomaker G84 Pro
Epomaker Luma40
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Low profile
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
QMK
VIA
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Epomaker G84 Pro vs Luma40: your questions
The G84 Pro is a 75% keyboard with a screen, metal knob, and 8,000mAh battery. The Luma40 is a 40% ortholinear keyboard with a CNC aluminum case and QMK/VIA support.
The G84 Pro has an interactive glass screen for time, battery, and status, and its vendor description says it can display custom GIFs. The Luma40 has no screen listed.
The Luma40 measures 240 x 87 x 21 mm and uses a 40% layout. The G84 Pro measures 347 x 147 x 42 mm and uses a 75% layout.
No, its compatibility rules specify low-profile switches and keycaps only, so standard MX keycaps will not fit. The G84 Pro’s keycap materials and profiles vary by configuration, including silicone or PBT caps described by Epomaker.
The Luma40 has north-facing LEDs, and its compatibility rule warns that Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing. Its specified keycap profile is LAK low-profile.
The Luma40 explicitly lists QMK and VIA support. The G84 Pro vendor description mentions web-based software, but QMK or VIA support is not specified for that keyboard.
The G84 Pro has an 8,000mAh battery, while the Luma40 has a 1,450mAh battery. Epomaker describes the Luma40 as lasting up to 75 hours with RGB off, while the G84 Pro description says its battery supports weeks of wireless typing with the backlight off.
Both list Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connectivity. The G84 Pro vendor description also specifies Bluetooth pairing with up to three devices.
The Luma40 weighs 410g, while the G84 Pro weighs 970g. Both support wireless connectivity, but the Luma40 is also smaller in its listed dimensions.
Yes, both list hot-swap support. Epomaker specifies 3-pin and 5-pin switches for the G84 Pro, while the Luma40 uses Kailh low-profile switches and requires low-profile replacements.
The G84 Pro’s 75% ANSI layout is the more conventional option compared with the Luma40’s 40% ortholinear layout. The Luma40 has no function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.