Which one should you get?
Get the
Epomaker G84 Pro
Battery Life
- Massive 8000mAh battery for extended wireless use.
- Unique silicone keycaps with a velvety texture.
- Customizable glass screen for GIFs and system info.
- Silicone keycaps are a non-standard material that may not appeal to all users.
- Plate-mounted stabilizers are not compatible with screw-in types.
- Relies on a web-based driver instead of downloadable software.
Get the
AULA EA75 Max
South-Facing RGB
- South-facing per-key RGB for better keycap compatibility.
- Uses durable, double-shot PBT keycaps.
- Includes four extra switches for customization.
- Smaller 5000mAh battery compared to the G84 Pro.
- Plate-mounted stabilizers are not compatible with screw-in types.
- Software can be difficult to find according to a user review.
Your priority should guide this choice. If you want the longest possible battery life and are intrigued by the feel of silicone keycaps, the Epomaker G84 Pro is the clear option. If you plan to use aftermarket keycaps or prefer the durability and standard feel of PBT, the Epomaker EA75 Max with its south-facing RGB is the more practical and modder-friendly board.
The differences that matter
Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.
Epomaker G84 Pro
AULA EA75 Max
Battery
8,000 mAh
5,000 mAh
Case material
ABS, Plastic
ABS
Switch options
Clicky, Linear, Silent
Linear, Silent
Display
Yes
TFT
Weight
970 g
958.5 g
- Epomaker G84 Pro
- AULA EA75 Max
- Performance
- 7979
- Build quality
- 6969
- Productivity
- 8383
- Customizability
- 7373
- Portability
- 9180
- Layout size: 75%
- Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
- Hot-swappable
- Max polling rate: 1,000 Hz
- Mount style: Gasket Mount
- Knob
What will you mostly use it for?
The G84 Pro wins for office use and travel due to its exceptional battery life and unique silicone keycap feel. The EA75 Max is the better pick for programming and modding, thanks to its south-facing RGB and standard PBT keycaps. For gaming, they are evenly matched on core performance specs, while content creators may lean towards the G84 Pro for its more emphasized multimedia controls and customizable screen.
It's a tie
- Both offer a 1000Hz polling rate in wired and 2.4GHz modes for low latency.
- Both feature N-Key Rollover for simultaneous key presses.
- Their compact 75% layouts free up desk space for mouse movement.
What owners say
Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.
Epomaker G84 Pro
14 owner reviews
“It's my first actual better keyboard, i was using some redragon dragon born keyboard but switching to this keyboard is like heaven for me, perfect sound perfect feel and everything”
“I enjoy the keyboard itself but still have yet to get the software to work. Any help?”
AULA EA75 Max
16 owner reviews
“The only bad thing is that the software is pretty hard to found, I don’t even know if it’s out there actually, anyways the product fantastic, the switches are smooth and lubed and the quality of the product is excellent”
“Good switches, nice keycaps. Shitty outsated driver. Some rgb doesn’t change even when using its own setting, doesn’t work with signalRGB. Sometimes when I turn on my pc the keyboard glitches and i have to switch to and from wireless mode for it to work…”
Epomaker G84 Pro vs AULA EA75 Max specs
Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.
10 of 23 specs differ
Epomaker G84 Pro
AULA EA75 Max
Switch options
Hot-swappable
Mount style
Sound dampening
Layout size
Layout standard
Ergonomics
Knob
Display
Connection
Max polling rate
Battery
USB-C
Case material
Plate material
Keycaps
Weight
Dimensions
Typing angle
Backlight
N-key rollover
Mac & Windows
Released
Compare prices
Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.
Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.
Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Epomaker G84 Pro vs AULA EA75 Max: your questions
The Epomaker G84 Pro has a significantly larger 8000mAh battery, while the EA75 Max has a 5000mAh battery. The manufacturer states the G84 Pro offers weeks of usage with the backlight off, suggesting a longer wireless runtime between charges.
Yes, both the Epomaker G84 Pro and the EA75 Max feature hot-swappable PCBs. They support 5-pin mechanical switches, and each includes a 2-in-1 keycap and switch puller in the box for easy customization.
The G84 Pro uses unique silicone keycaps described as velvety and non-grippy. The EA75 Max uses more traditional double-shot PBT plastic keycaps, which are known for durability and resistance to shine over time.
South-facing RGB means the LEDs on the EA75 Max are positioned on the south side (bottom) of the switch. This prevents interference with the legends on Cherry-profile and other sculpted keycap sets, a common issue with north-facing LEDs.
Both manufacturers state their keyboards are compatible with Mac systems. However, the vendor page for the EA75 Max specifies that its software supports Windows and Mac, but customization requires a wired connection to a PC.
Compatibility with specific gaming consoles is not stated in the provided specifications. Both keyboards are compatible with Windows, Mac, and Android devices via their USB-C, 2.4GHz, and Bluetooth 5.0 connections.
Both are designed for a creamy, thocky sound profile. The G84 Pro uses a 5-layer acoustic foam setup including PORON and latex. The EA75 Max also uses a 5-layer dampening system with a sandwich pad, IXPE switch pad, and bottom silicone. The sound will also be influenced by their different keycap materials.
The G84 Pro includes the keyboard, a USB A-to-C cable, a 2.4GHz receiver, a 2-in-1 puller, a manual, and two extra switches. The EA75 Max includes the same items but with four extra switches and an additional quick start guide.
The vendor description for the EA75 Max states it has factory-lubed and tuned stabilizers. The description for the G84 Pro does not specify the state of its plate-mounted stabilizers.
Both product listings specify that their plate-mounted stabilizers are not compatible with screw-in stabilizers. This limits your options for stabilizer upgrades to other plate-mount varieties.
For both keyboards, the 2.4GHz wireless mode offers a 1000Hz polling rate. The Bluetooth mode operates at a 125Hz polling rate, which is standard for Bluetooth connectivity to conserve battery life.
Not sold on either?
Still torn?
Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.









